JoeHill wrote:
It seems to be sending three copies of your mail to the list, too! Maybe that's
what's slowing your system down... ;-)
:-)
raf
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club :
On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:15:30 +0200
Raffaele BELARDI disseminated the following:
> > I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of
> > 10.0,
> > both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine,
> > Pentium
> > II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on suc
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on suc
Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both CE and Official. I revived an ancient (~6 years old) NT machine, Pentium
II 400MHz, graphics card so old it's no longer supported by the vendor. I was
surprised how responsive it is on suc
On May 14, 2004 01:55, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
...
> I remember somebody defining 10.0 "speed daemon" so I was quite
> negatively impressed by my results. Has anybody noticed such bad
> performance?
>
> raffaele
I never used Mdk 9, but I can tell you I was impressed with the speed of 10.0,
both C
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Raffaele BELARDI
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] 10.0 slower than 9.2?
John Drouhard wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
>
>>Simple
John Drouhard wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip
LOTS of frames
>
What video card do you have? If it's an nvidia card, you might need to
Nope, it's an ATI Radeon 7xxx (don't remember exact model
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:55 +0200, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> Simple test: same movies that in 9.2 played fine and smooth in 10.0 skip
> LOTS of frames. I tried with mplayer, xine and totem, always the same
> result. Yes, it's an old mobo (AMD K6-2/550), but in 9.2 it did its job.
>
What video c
