I started using mandrake about a week ago. Before
mandrake I used conectiva. Although I have a little
experience with urpm I think it is better than apt.
From my limited experience I've had better success with
rpmfind, actually, especially rpmfind -newer. But I am
thinking that the (recent)
Baka Attila Tams wrote:
Hi!
I've been fooling around with Conectiva linux for some days. I had a few
problems that made me turn back to mandrake again (gcc won't work, nvidia
doesn't recognize my kernel, can't install mplayer or openoffice) as I need
a working OS.
What I really loved about
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:11:58 +0200, Baka Attila Tamás [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've been fooling around with Conectiva linux for some days. I had a few
problems that made me turn back to mandrake again (gcc won't work, nvidia
doesn't recognize my kernel, can't install mplayer or
Yes you can use apt-get, but it is dangerous without the thorough
discipline of the Debian package preparation.
You can also use urpmi to much the same effect
like put all the packages in one place on the web (who cares if the rpms
are apt-get capable) do a urpmi.addmedia to generate a
Hi
I started using mandrake about a week ago. Before
mandrake I used conectiva. Although I have a little
experience with urpm I think it is better than apt.
With urpm you can select from which rpm repositary you
want to download a package without having to edit any
file. Another thing. Let's say
