On Sunday 09 June 2002 10:06 am, you wrote:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 04:21 pm, you wrote:
> > Hi,
> >I've had excellent results with xcdroast,last three Mandrake releases.
> > No problems at all. Pentium IV 1.5 gigahertz, GA-81DX mobo,Cendyne
> > 16x10x40x burner.Currently running MDK 8.2. H
darklord wrote:
> Xcdroast finds both, has them in correct positions on the
> SCSI chain, but will not read any CD in my DVD drive. It
> always reports that its an empty CDRW.
If you haven't yet upgraded the xcdroast, mkisofs, cdda2wav,
and cdrecord rpms then do so. There's one other wrinkle
On Saturday 08 June 2002 04:21 pm, you wrote:
> Hi,
>I've had excellent results with xcdroast,last three Mandrake releases.
> No problems at all. Pentium IV 1.5 gigahertz, GA-81DX mobo,Cendyne
> 16x10x40x burner.Currently running MDK 8.2. Had a lot of problems before I
> bought this burner. J
On Saturday 08 June 2002 11:09 am, you wrote:
> alias bdcd="cdrecord -v -eject speed=8 dev=0,0 -data"
> (need to make cd_image first, eg, 'mkisofs -r -o cd_image ')
> alias biso="cdrecord -v -eject speed=8 dev=0,0"
> alias bacd="cdrecord -v -eject speed=8 dev=0,0 -pad -audio *.wav"
Thanks for
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:09:36 -0500
Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 08:10 am, darklord wrote:
> > On Friday 07 June 2002 07:53 pm, you wrote:
> > >I ust'a think the same, but lately burnin from the CL is
> > > easier, quicker, and safer than any GUI. I recent
On Saturday 08 June 2002 08:10 am, darklord wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2002 07:53 pm, you wrote:
> >I ust'a think the same, but lately burnin from the CL is
> > easier, quicker, and safer than any GUI. I recently thought
> > Gcombust to be the most reliable, it's since proved me wrong :(
> >
On Friday 07 June 2002 07:53 pm, you wrote:
>
>I ust'a think the same, but lately burnin from the CL is easier,
> quicker, and safer than any GUI. I recently thought Gcombust to be
> the most reliable, it's since proved me wrong :( Then I discovered
> how quick and simple it was to burn from
On Friday 07 June 2002 12:27 pm, Franki wrote:
> yeah, that was my initial concern.. but I have found many things
> possible that were not before I got 160mb of ram..
Doesn't make much diff, 32, or 512mb ram
> Also, the burner has the 4mb cache..
That's the 'buffer' (fifo). That's the "
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Davidson
Sent: Friday, 7 June 2002 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] xcdroast and burning CD's.
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:06:43 +0800
"Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:06:43 +0800
"Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys..
>
> Just wondering.. what sort of system is required to burn CD's...
>
> I have a p233mmx with 160mb ram and a 16x HP IDE burner..
>
> wondering if thats good enough to use for burning???
>
> I have 8.2 on the b
Hi guys..
Just wondering.. what sort of system is required to burn CD's...
I have a p233mmx with 160mb ram and a 16x HP IDE burner..
wondering if thats good enough to use for burning???
I have 8.2 on the box and a 40gig hard disk.
any ideas?
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EM
11 matches
Mail list logo