an on physical media.
hope this explanation helps.
any errors pls correct me.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin L. Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 04:54
Subject: Re: [newbie] Help with memtest and errors. (a litt
On Friday 24 October 2003 02:36, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > But (just to clarify things), does it perform better with 512
> > than 1024 ? Or does a person just not need that much?
>
>Not for a desktop. Only servers handling web services and lot'sa
> lot'sa users, or a sound/video studio. So unles
On Thursday 23 October 2003 12:45 pm, Martin L. Johansen wrote:
> > > Does that mean I'm actually better off using less than 1Gig
> > > of RAM ?
> >
> > Yes. 99% of users don't even need 512MB
>
> But (just to clarify things), does it perform better with 512
> than 1024 ? Or does a person just
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:16 pm, Terence J. Golightly wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 09:45, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > > Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
> >
> >Yes, but the performance will be better than using all
> > 1024MB's. The memory management needed to address
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 09:45, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> >
> > Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
>
>Yes, but the performance will be better than using all 1024MB's.
> The memory management needed to address 1GB or more of ram imposes a
> performance hit.
Tom,
I added mem=86
On Thursday 23 October 2003 21:54, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2003 01:42 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > > Does that mean I'm actually better off using less than 1Gig of
> > > RAM ?
> >
> > Yes. 99% of users don't even need 512MB
>
> I've got 512 of DDR here and AFAIK, I've -nev
On Thursday 23 October 2003 01:42 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > Does that mean I'm actually better off using less than 1Gig of
> > RAM ?
>
> Yes. 99% of users don't even need 512MB
I've got 512 of DDR here and AFAIK, I've -never- hit swap...so I'd have to
agree...unless you're doing something
On Thursday 23 October 2003 19:42, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:40 am, Martin L. Johansen wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:45, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > > > Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
> > >
> > >Yes, but the performance will be better
On Thursday 23 October 2003 11:40 am, Martin L. Johansen wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:45, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > > Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
> >
> >Yes, but the performance will be better than using all
> > 1024MB's. The memory management needed to add
On Thursday 23 October 2003 15:45, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
>
>Yes, but the performance will be better than using all 1024MB's.
> The memory management needed to address 1GB or more of ram imposes a
> performance hit.
Does that mean I'm
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:41 pm, Terence J. Golightly wrote:
> > > > You'll need to
> > > > do the same, or add mem=860Mto your lilo append line
> > > > for the kernel you're usin.
>
> Then I'm using only 860M of ram and not all 1024, right?
Yes, but the performance will be better t
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 18:36, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
> > > But, I took some precautions. First I d/l'd a 1 GB ram
> > > capable kernel (2.4.22-18mdk-i686-up-4GB) an installed it.
> >
> > I'll check on my Mdk cds. Would I be able to urpmi it?
>
> You don't mention versions. 9.2 should hav
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:15 pm, Terence J. Golightly wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:54, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
>
> > Barefoot on a tile floor is my method ;) If your not
> > familiar with bios ram timing options, set the ram to auto or
> > bios defaults. Cas 3, precharge 3, banking
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:54, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> Barefoot on a tile floor is my method ;) If your not familiar
> with bios ram timing options, set the ram to auto or bios defaults.
> Cas 3, precharge 3, banking disabled are the safest (but slowest)
> settings.
>
> > Memtest gave me erro
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 10:06 pm, Terence J. Golightly wrote:
> Tom/List,
>
> I bought the memory according to a newer post to you sent (I
> can't find it :( ). Got the Two 512 MB sticks in the mail and
> stuck them both in (using proper static aviodance procedure) and
> tested.
Barefoot o
Tom/List,
I bought the memory according to a newer post to you sent (I can't find
it :( ). Got the Two 512 MB sticks in the mail and stuck them both in
(using proper static aviodance procedure) and tested. Memtest gave me
errors in the five figure area. I shutdown and tested each stick
individu
16 matches
Mail list logo
