Message -
From: H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NVIDIA driver pops up its ugly head
On Thursday 04 December 2003 17:11, JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:55:57 +0100
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Friday 05 December 2003 09:58, Drew Martin wrote:
HarM,
I have only just caught up with this thread.I use the same
graphics card.Which I set up with the NVIDIA run. driver and complied the
kernel. Would you like me to copy and paste the config 4 file,so you can
compare them?
On Thursday 04 December 2003 09:09 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
H. Hehehehh, are you getting back at me for criticizing yer reply
settings?;D
grin Of course not!
H. shocking mess: no more user/lib/module.deps (or something
along that line) H. and an unworkable system:(
H. Luckily I can boot
On Thursday 04 December 2003 11:03, robin wrote:
Have you checked for stale GL simlinks?
Sir Robin
Well lately, no I haven't but I did a fresh test-install on a spare partition
which gave me exactly the same errors.
Then I'm already grabbing at straws so I might as well do that so's to be
H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having a ball getting the proprietary nvidia drivers to work on box for a
geforce2 DDR card.
I've already tried every trick in the book and a lot that aren't, frying the
initrd twice in the process and using every kernel I could get my hands on to
boot.
On Thursday 04 December 2003 03:31 am, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
H. Ah yes, I have commented out the dri line in
/etc/security/console.perms and H. there's no line pointing to it in
XF86Config-4 nor to GLcore, so it isn't H. that.
Just a random thought - there are -2- DRI lines in the
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:55:57 +0100
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to think it's either the card itself or the GLX rpm.
*Sometimes*, for some weird reason, you have to put the complete path to the GLX
library, so where it says:
Load glx # 3D layer
...you may need to
On Thursday 04 Dece9mbr 2003 16:13, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2003 03:31 am, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
H. Ah yes, I have commented out the dri line in
/etc/security/console.perms and H. there's no line pointing to it in
XF86Config-4 nor to GLcore, so it isn't H. that.
Just
On Thursday 04 December 2003 17:11, JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:55:57 +0100
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to think it's either the card itself or the GLX rpm.
*Sometimes*, for some weird reason, you have to put the complete path to
the GLX library, so where
On Thursday 04 December 2003 22:23, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Did you do the:
chmod 0666 /dev/nvidia*
chown root /dev/nvidia*
thingy?
Hehehehh, are you getting back at me for criticizing yer reply settings?;D
No, I didn't.
Anyway, this is what I get:
chmod 0666 /dev/nvidia*
chmod: failed to
10 matches
Mail list logo
