Re: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages)

2022-02-01 Thread Tilghman Lesher
nt from Mail for Windows > > > > From: Kent Perrier > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:18 AM > To: nlug-talk@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages) > > > > > If anyone migrated their CentOS boxes to OEL,

RE: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages)

2022-01-31 Thread Mark J. Bailey
<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> Mail for Windows From: <mailto:kent.perr...@gmail.com> Kent Perrier Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:18 AM To: <mailto:nlug-talk@googlegroups.com> nlug-talk@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreemen

Re: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages)

2022-01-31 Thread Kent Perrier
If anyone migrated their CentOS boxes to OEL, they gave Oracle the same right. Oracle is far more aggressive on the enforcement of that than Red Hat ever has. On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 3:03 AM Mark J. Bailey wrote: > Hello, > > > > I was having to deal with RHEL8 for a client this weekend, and in

Re: [nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages)

2022-01-31 Thread John R. Dennison
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:02:59AM -0600, Mark J. Bailey wrote: > > I must admit, it was a bit of an eye opener. For my part, don’t think > I’ve ever seen anything quite like this in the OSS “free” world. > Anyways, it’s by and large a moot point of concern for most everyone > present here, but

[nlug] RHEL8's "Enterprise Agreement" (for the free usages)

2022-01-31 Thread Mark J. Bailey
Hello, I was having to deal with RHEL8 for a client this weekend, and in doing some research on something related to the client’s need, I stumbled across yet another post in Reddit on Rocky/Alma/etc vs RHEL’s free usage scenarios. What caught my attention in particular was one commenter