Oggie having a quiet game but it doesn't seem to matter. ZUBAR!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 7:53 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
Clear cut penalty
Suddenly looking probable - 3 goals from wolves? Surely they must concede at
least 2.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Crowe
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 7:53 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
Wolves have brought on Ward. You might get your money yet Paul!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 8:21 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Penalty
Ooh - Harsh. but fair.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 8:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
Wolves have brought on Ward. You might get your
Oh O here we go - Mr Crowe's going to have 30 secs of hell.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 8:51 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
16 points away
.
--
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
*Sent:* Wednesday, 24 March 2010 8:51 AM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
16 points away from home – same as Liverpool and better
March 2010 9:05 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
I can't believe that the team I've supported for the last 30 years can play
football like that now. Effectively eight points clear with seven to play,
on the magical point per game. What a time to come
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
West Ham were very poor though. I wouldn't be surpised to see them go down.
I can't imagine the bottom three will stay like that till the end of the
season. There must be a few twists and turns.
However, we were good against Villa, so I'm not letting
?
- Original Message -
From: Steven Millward
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
West Ham were very poor though. I wouldn't be surpised to see them go down.
I can't imagine the bottom three will stay
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Penalty decision!
From West Ham fora Rog?
I've got a mate who supports West Ham, and when we got promoted he said on
Facebook well done - six easy points for West Ham. If he'd said that in the
pub
10 matches
Mail list logo
