Hi
I have defined a two-level head structure with independent numbering. It
works as intended with mkii, but with mkiv, the top-level number is
prepended to all second-level heads in the table of contents. With
mkii, I get:
Part A First
1 One
2 Two
...
with mkiv:
Part A First
A.1
the proper Unicode glyphs
(U+201C, U+00A0, etc.) nowadays? I assume the files are old MkII
files and not being updated since. Example:
\setupbibtex [database=sample]
\setuppublications [alternative=ssa]
\starttext
\cite[hh2010a]
\cite[Eijkhout1991]
\cite[hh2010]
\placepublications
and the tilde might interfere with the \asciimode
setting. Wouldn't it be better to use the proper Unicode glyphs
(U+201C, U+00A0, etc.) nowadays? I assume the files are old MkII
files and not being updated since. Example:
\setupbibtex [database=sample]
\setuppublications [alternative=ssa
.
http://pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf
x-set-*.mkii, .mkiv
Cheers,
Sietse
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 18-9-2012 16:00, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
http://pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf
… tex/texmf-context/tex/context
On 14-9-2012 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi alessan...@perucchi.org:
Hello,
In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of
\textrule and \setuptextrule are different...
What I did was quite simple:
\textrule
On 15 sept. 2012, at 00:12, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Alessandro Perucchi
alessan...@perucchi.org wrote:
On 14 Sep 2012, at 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wolfgang.schus...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a vertical skip missing in the MkIV
Am 14.09.2012 um 23:50 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi alessan...@perucchi.org:
And apparently the command \starttextrule ... \stoptextrule doesn't work
(this was explain in the cont-entp.pdf page 204) in either mkii mliv.
This does work for me:
\starttext
blah blah blah
On 15 sept. 2012, at 09:28, Wolfgang Schuster wolfgang.schus...@gmail.com
wrote:
Remove [top] from \starttextrule. All possible combinations are:
(...)
Hello Wolfgang,
Thanks, now I understand how this command works.
So probably it would be good to correct the documentation accordingly (
Hi Alessandro,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Alessandro Perucchi
alessan...@perucchi.org wrote:
So probably it would be good to correct the documentation
accordingly ( even if all coders hate that part :-D ) Or maybe
update the wiki... Is anybody able to modify the wiki? if
yes then I
Hi Jaroslav,
While I was looking, I could not find it. I wanted to put your example into
the wiki, but the wiki shows the numbers and hidden sections, so I did not
there yet.
That might be because the wiki uses mkii by default; to use mkiv write
context mode=mkiv
If you can't get an example
was looking, I could not find it. I wanted to put your example into
the wiki, but the wiki shows the numbers and hidden sections, so I did not
there yet.
That might be because the wiki uses mkii by default; to use mkiv write
context mode=mkiv
If you can't get an example to work at all, simply write
wanted to put your
example into
the wiki, but the wiki shows the numbers and hidden sections, so I
did not
there yet.
That might be because the wiki uses mkii by default; to use mkiv write
context mode=mkiv
If you can't get an example to work at all, simply write the code inside
texcode.../texcode
:48, Sietse Brouwer napsal(a):
Hi Jaroslav,
While I was looking, I could not find it. I wanted to put your example
into
the wiki, but the wiki shows the numbers and hidden sections, so I did
not
there yet.
That might be because the wiki uses mkii by default; to use mkiv write
context mode=mkiv
not find it. I wanted to put your
example into
the wiki, but the wiki shows the numbers and hidden sections, so I
did not
there yet.
That might be because the wiki uses mkii by default; to use mkiv write
context mode=mkiv
If you can't get an example to work at all, simply write the code
inside
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Hans,
I noticed that with the latest version of mkiv (ConTeXt ver: 2012.09.10 00:57)
the command
\items[location=bottom]
does not behave as usual (in mkii the bejaviour is correct)
Minimal example:
\starttext
\items[symbol=8,n=5,width
(ConTeXt ver: 2012.09.10
00:57) the command
\items[location=bottom]
does not behave as usual (in mkii the bejaviour is correct)
Minimal example:
\starttext
\items[symbol=8,n=5,width=\hsize,location=bottom]{png,eps,pdf,jpg,tif}
\blank
\items[symbol=8,n=5,location=bottom]{png,eps,pdf
Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi alessan...@perucchi.org:
Hello,
In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of
\textrule and \setuptextrule are different...
What I did was quite simple:
\textrule{Testing head}
blah blah blah
\textrule
Hi Pol,
You can use the following:
%% begin show-math.tex
\doifmode{mkiv}{\usemodule[s][mat-11]}
\starttext
\doifmodeelse{mkiv}{\showmathfontcharacters}{\showmathcharacters}
\stoptext
%% end show-math.tex
However in mkiv the presentation of math fonts is not the same as in mkii.
I don't know
On 14 Sep 2012, at 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wolfgang.schus...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi alessan...@perucchi.org:
Hello,
In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of
\textrule and \setuptextrule are different
found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of
\textrule and \setuptextrule are different...
What I did was quite simple:
\textrule{Testing head}
blah blah blah
\textrule
in mkii the text in well centered between the lines.
But in mkiv the bottom line is too near the text, and I need
(and probably forced us to fix major problems in Type1 for
MKII/MKIV). So it's partially your fault that OpenType Lucida exists
in the first place. Blame yourself for the extra choiceprice you are
offered now ;)
But Hans already told you back then: don't use Lucida, didn't he?
Mojca
“\currentheadnumber” with “\namedheadnumber{section}”.
Wolfgang
Wow that was fast, thanks Wolfgang.
I started to change the examples in the wiki
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Titles. But I realised we need to
distinguish MKIV from MKII and I don't really know what I am doing...
--
John
20
(../t-setup.tex
system : module set-02 (mkii) loaded
(/home/fc065089/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/x-
set-02.mkii
! I can't find file `mult-en()'.
l.28 \input mult-\userinterfacetag()
(Press Enter to retry, or Control-D
Hello,
In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of
\textrule and \setuptextrule are different...
What I did was quite simple:
\textrule{Testing head}
blah blah blah
\textrule
in mkii the text in well centered between the lines.
But in mkiv the bottom line is too
to call it) with two
sections, in which you input the respective .bbl-file plus a list of \nocite
's for the items you want.
My .tex-file, which works with mkii and mkiv, is like this:
---
\setuppublications[alternative=apa,sorttype=bbl]
\setuphead[chapter
Dear Hans,
I noticed that with the latest version of mkiv (ConTeXt ver: 2012.09.10 00:57)
the command
\items[location=bottom]
does not behave as usual (in mkii the bejaviour is correct)
Minimal example:
\starttext
\items[symbol=8,n=5,width=\hsize,location=bottom]{png,eps,pdf,jpg,tif
directory.
One can hardcode a path in the tex source if needed. Another option is
to move to the source path (something texmfstart --path ... texexec ...
or mtxrun --path ... --script context ...) but what's best depends on
the kind of project.
Do you really need to use context mkii? As it's
will study texmfstart. :-)
Do you really need to use context mkii? As it's a new project, using context
mkiv might be a better idea.
No, I don't. I want to use always the preferred solution. I want to
follow your guidelines and be enlightened... :-)
How did you know I was using one and not the other
On Mon 10 Sep 2012, Andre Caldas wrote:
Do you really need to use context mkii? As it's a new project,
using context mkiv might be a better idea.
No, I don't. I want to use always the preferred solution. I want to
follow your guidelines and be enlightened... :-)
How did you know I
“\tablewidth” to store the value of the key while figures use
“\figurewidth” to store the value etc.
In reality context uses namespace like “@@ef” in MkII and in MkIV namespace
have the form “123” where instead of letters numbers are used.
Wolfgang
makes it possible to
distinguish them because there a many setups which have a width key, e.g.
tables can “\tablewidth” to store the value of the key while figures use
“\figurewidth” to store the value etc.
In reality context uses namespace like “@@ef” in MkII and in MkIV namespace have
the form
not to work properly for me!
Both problems do not occur at all in mkii!
Best regards,
Dominik
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http
/modules/gfsdidot.zip
- http://dl.contextgarden.net/modules/gfsdidot/
but that is a very old package written in 2005 to support using Greek
fonts in ConTeXt MKII. The author (Thomas) would probably suggest you
to use MKIV instead of this package for MKII.
Mojca
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com writes:
but that is a very old package written in 2005 to support using Greek
fonts in ConTeXt MKII. The author (Thomas) would probably suggest you
to use MKIV instead of this package for MKII.
Ok, no problem, I just stumbled on that error
Hi,
In the following minimal example
\startformula
P = \left(\vphantom{\sum}\smash{\sum_{\startsubstack
1 \le i \le p \NR
1 \le j \le q \NR
1 \le k \le r \NR
\stopsubstack}}
a_{ij}b_{jk}c_{ki}
\right)
\stopformula
\smash does not work properly in mkiv – in mkii it runs just fine!
Best regards
. The next example draws no frame, but if you remove the
mode=mkii then all is well. It works with both mkii and the latest
beta on my local machine.
context mode=mkiv
\showframe
asdf
/context
Cheers,
Sietse
___
If your
the XML page on the wiki a bit. The separation
between mkii and mkiv wasn't visible enough, I think. It would now make
sense to add a category manipulating xml in lua code (or something to
that effect) under the mkiv heading and then add the lxml code.
All best
Thomas
--
Prof. Dr. Thomas
Hello all,
Having used MkII to make a nicely formatted version of a document, I now
need to make a draft version document in order to submit it to a
journal. They want the figure captions as a list at the end of the
document and the figures collected on pages at the end too. The draft
in a
terminal window.
In that case we just ask Richard Koch if it can be done ...
=
Hi Dick,
Context files can have several suffixes: .tex .mkiv .mkii .cld (to
mention some). Is it possible to let texshop see all of these as source
that can be processed
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-7-2012 22:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain extent - read and interpret fontconfig's XML configuration
file. The real question is whether ConTeXt finds the right file. On
windows
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-7-2012 22:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain extent - read and interpret fontconfig's XML configuration
file. The real
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-7-2012 22:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain extent - read
filename
Any comments are welcome.
For MkII you have to load the typescript file and the typescript yourself while
for MkIV these two steps are done together with the \setupbodyfont command when
the name for the typeface, typescript and file is the same (e.g. gentium and
type-gentium
On 07/29/2012 03:34 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
For MkII you have to load the typescript file and the typescript
yourself while for MkIV these two steps are done together with the
\setupbodyfont command when the name for the typeface, typescript and
file is the same (e.g. gentium and type
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Bill Meahan wrote:
Just curious: will ConTeXt use the fontconfig mechanism some day or are
there technical/philosophical reasons not to?
Do you mean MKII or MKIV? For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain extent - read and interpret fontconfig's XML
On 29-7-2012 22:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Bill Meahan wrote:
Just curious: will ConTeXt use the fontconfig mechanism some day or are
there technical/philosophical reasons not to?
Do you mean MKII or MKIV? For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain
the right tounicode info so i have no clue what goes
wrong there
me neither.
the pdf produced with MkII never ran into this post-processing trouble.
they had this font info, eg.:
Type: Type 1
Encoding: Custom
while all fonts I have tested with MkIV result in this:
Type: Type 1 (CID)
Encoding
with MkIV?
afaik context output the right tounicode info so i have no clue what goes wrong
there
me neither.
the pdf produced with MkII never ran into this post-processing trouble.
they had this font info, eg.:
Type: Type 1
Encoding: Custom
probably not always, i.e. when ttf fonts were used
using this
kind of encoding.
Is this also possible with MkIV?
afaik context output the right tounicode info so i have no clue what goes
wrong there
me neither.
the pdf produced with MkII never ran into this post-processing trouble.
they had this font info, eg.:
Type: Type 1
parameters (in mkii that is
often the case but not in mkiv)
it all depends on what kind of functionality you're dealing with
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH
, a redefine does not reset already set parameters (in mkii that is
often the case but not in mkiv)
it all depends on what kind of functionality you're dealing with
Hans
OK, let's deal with a specific use case.
I'm publisher/editor/reporter/photographer/mailer/janitor/coffeemaker
.
MKII is stable, but MKIV is still a moving target and from time to
time one or the other thing changes (LaTeX is in a sense way more
stable, but on the other hand 99.9% of the time you have no chance
that anyone would implement any feature request to make your life
easier).
Mojca
-simplefonts}{}
simplefonts is a MkIV module, you are using MkII. If you don't have
a particular reason to use MkII with XeTeX I would recommend to
switch to MkIV and LuaTeX. The difference is basically compiling
with “context file.tex” instead of “texexec --xetex file.tex”. And
it is also
to expect IMO. Not everyone is a
typographer to produce the appropriate fine-typography glyphs for
their favourite font to cater to a particular style. Why should the
system impose super-duper typography on users when they are willing
to settle for less?
Sure, but one problem with a mkii fake approach
for less?
Sure, but one problem with a mkii fake approach is that it is fragile when
something else than 8 bit characters shows up in the content stream.
Is that also true for XeTeX? (What is an 8-bit character when talking of XeTeX?)
As far as I remember converting uppercase into lowercase or vice
\ctxloadluafile
{t-simplefonts}{}
simplefonts is a MkIV module, you are using MkII. If you don't have
a particular reason to use MkII with XeTeX
He does. He just explained that he wants to use Indic scripts and
unless someone writes support for them ...
However this means that t
when they are willing
to settle for less?
Sure, but one problem with a mkii fake approach is that it is fragile when
something else than 8 bit characters shows up in the content stream.
Is that also true for XeTeX? (What is an 8-bit character when talking of XeTeX?)
On the one hand less
/ Simplefonts
! Undefined control sequence.
l.144 \ctxloadluafile
{t-simplefonts}{}
simplefonts is a MkIV module, you are using MkII. If you don't have
a particular reason to use MkII with XeTeX
He does. He just explained that he wants to use Indic scripts and
unless someone
it be fixed?
The example fails because in the MkIV version the command is applied to each
table entry and not to the whole row as it was in MkII.
\usemodule[database]
\define[1]\MyCommand
{\framed{#1}}
\defineseparatedlist
[PriceTag]
[separator={:},
command=\MyCommand]
\starttext
result, but
unfortunately only with mkii.
It does not work with mkiv (of july 13 and earlier) and I need mkiv for the
rest of the thesis.
The example given below works with mkii but not with mkiv (of july 13 and
earlier). With mkiv the following happens:
With \placepublications[criterium=local
\starttext
\startMPcode
graphictext Test;
\stopMPcode
\stoptext
doesn't work as expected in mkiv. *.mpy file is empty.
In mkii error is issued during the run. Ignoring it finally produces the
outlines, so it seems, everything needed is available (gs, pdftops,
pstoedit). Anyway, mkiv way is preferred
.
Fwiw Taco’s “System Macros” is part of the wiki as well:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/System_Macros. As it was written
with MkII in mind, you might want to check the definitions in
syst-aux.mkiv in your /context/base/ directory if they are
still around and, if applicable, what their replacement
in many ways, including guessing at what the source is about.
Fwiw Taco’s “System Macros” is part of the wiki as well:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/System_Macros. As it was written
with MkII in mind, you might want to check the definitions in
syst-aux.mkiv in your /context/base/ directory
Am 14.07.2012 um 23:50 schrieb Eythan Weg:
Thank you. But isn't \donknuthmode suppose to keep the
compatibility with standard tex?
Only MkII keeps the traditional behavior for _, ^ and , in MkIV
there is no way to go back but as I have show’n you there is \aligntab
which can be used
.
concerning 'broken' ... that's what you have with betas ... most recent
changes concern reshuffling code, better namespace protection, cleanup
and speedup, etc, all part of the mkii - mkiv move
Ah I see.
the problem reported by you (as wolfgang already pointed out) relates to
the fact
under mkii (pdftex, xetex), plain tex
(luatex, xetex), latex (luatex) etc.
Would someone comment?
Thank you,
Eythan
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist
:
! Only one # is allowed per tab.
This runs error-free under mkii (pdftex, xetex), plain tex
(luatex, xetex), latex (luatex) etc.
Would someone comment?
The error message is not very helpful in this case because the is the problem.
In MkIV we made a while ago _, ^ and normal characters
under mkii (pdftex, xetex), plain tex
(luatex, xetex), latex (luatex) etc.
Would someone comment?
The error message is not very helpful in this case because the is the
problem.
In MkIV we made a while ago _, ^ and normal characters in the text and you
don’t have
protection, cleanup
and speedup, etc, all part of the mkii - mkiv move
the problem reported by you (as wolfgang already pointed out) relates to
the fact that (from now on) such commands have to be defined
unexpandable (due to a different way of checking them) .. also, some of
these 'command
ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.08 20:02 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.8 int:
english/english).
In mkii there is no bug in this regard.
Is there a quick fix for this? In some of my documents I must use mkiv and the
appearance of this bug is a little bit annoying…
(I already reported this bug in June).
Best regards: OK
Test;
\stopMPcode
\stoptext
doesn't work as expected in mkiv. *.mpy file is empty.
In mkii error is issued during the run. Ignoring it finally produces the
outlines, so it seems, everything needed is available (gs, pdftops,
pstoedit). Anyway, mkiv way is preferred.
Thanks for the help
gives an Omega which is too far away from the integral sign.
(Using ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.08 20:02 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.8 int:
english/english).
In mkii there is no bug in this regard.
Is there a quick fix for this? In some of my documents I must use mkiv and
the appearance of this bug
.
(Using ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.08 20:02 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.8 int:
english/english).
In mkii there is no bug in this regard.
Is there a quick fix for this? In some of my documents I must use mkiv and
the appearance of this bug is a little bit annoying…
(I already reported this bug in June
the Kidd index?
I am using MKII.
Alan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Alan Bowen bowenala...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been experimenting for a while with \placeregister and
\setupregister and can find no way no prevent page breaks before a
register. Simply inserting \page[no] does not seem to work
Hi,
Thanks for the new features, Hans!
I don't know whether you overlooked my previous message about the distance
problem with integral signs: it is still there, that is in mkiv $\int_\Omega$
results in \Omega too far away from the integral sign. In mkii everything is
correct.
Best regards
I have been experimenting for a while with \placeregister and
\setupregister and can find no way no prevent page breaks before a
register. Simply inserting \page[no] does not seem to work.
So can anyone suggest a way to do this in MKII?
Alan
sec:first is defined. Basically, a ctags file contains tag
and the file name and line number where those tags are defined. The editor
then reads the ctags file and jumps to the appropriate location.
A few years back, I had written a MkII module that generated ctags file
when a tex file
.
For the moment, this is MkIV only feature.
Since this is a new feature and not a bug fix I see no need to keep
MkII and MkIV in sync. For new projects I use MkIV since quite some
time and the MkII projects are in danger of extinction.
If you want to experiment, make the above change in file-res.lua
little
change in the source.
Hooking into existing ConTeXt code is easy :)
For the moment, this is MkIV only feature.
Since this is a new feature and not a bug fix I see no need to keep
MkII and MkIV in sync. For new projects I use MkIV since quite some
time and the MkII projects are in danger
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.06.2012 um 20:52 schrieb Alan Bowen:
Is there a way in MKII to ensure that there is never a page break
between a heading and the following text?
\setuphead[after={\page[no]}] does not seem to work without entering
vertical mode before \page. But, so far
]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,7pt]
\stopMPenvironment
and it changed the font size but the font type is not palatino.
1. Do you use MkII or MkIV?
2. Do you want Palatino only for the metapost labels or also for the main font
in the document?
Wolfgang
1. Do you use MkII or MkIV?
2. Do you want Palatino only for the metapost labels or also for the main
font in the document?
I am using MkIV. Whether it is possible I would like to use a different
font for the metapost labels
Am 10.06.2012 um 18:56 schrieb Alfredo Catalina:
1. Do you use MkII or MkIV?
2. Do you want Palatino only for the metapost labels or also for the main
font in the document?
I am using MkIV. Whether it is possible I would like to use a different font
for the metapost labels
Is there a way in MKII to ensure that there is never a page break between a
heading and the following text?
\setuphead[after={\page[no]}] does not seem to work without entering
vertical mode before \page. But, so far, I have not found a way to enter
vertical mode in after={…} that does not add
Am 10.06.2012 um 20:52 schrieb Alan Bowen:
Is there a way in MKII to ensure that there is never a page break between a
heading and the following text?
\setuphead[after={\page[no]}] does not seem to work without entering vertical
mode before \page. But, so far, I have not found a way
=\DesignSize{4}]
\stoptext
In mkii is perfect.
I've also tried
\define[1]\DesignSize{3.5cm/4*#1}
with the same result.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
#1{3.5cm/4*#1}%
\starttext
\externalfigure[hacker.jpg][width=\DesignSize{4}]
\stoptext
In mkii is perfect.
I've also tried
\define[1]\DesignSize{3.5cm/4*#1}
with the same result.
\define[1]\DesignSize{\the\dimexpr3.5cm/4*#1\relax}
Wolfgang
, the requested amounts for funding are more than
reasonable.
This is what the author has answered to one of my question about how I
could let user select which modules to install (module = a collection
of fonts, a collection of mkii-only related files, engine-related
files etc.) out of the whole distribution
a
definition with \def. When I run in mkiv this I get the text 4t alongside
the picture.
\def\DesignSize#1{3.5cm/4*#1}%
\starttext
\externalfigure[hacker.jpg][width=\DesignSize{4}]
\stoptext
In mkii is perfect.
I've also tried
\define[1]\DesignSize{3.5cm/4*#1}
with the same
Hi,
in MkIV there is no space in front of the \EQ symbol in the second row while in
MkII there is a space.
\starttext
\starttabulate
\NC A\EQ B \NC\NR
\NC Left \EQ Right \NC\NR
\stoptabulate
\stoptext
Wolfgang
of the Maps module. There are both
mkiv and mkii versions, but the mkii version is unsupported
and does not support realfonts mode.
It would be nice if some of you would run tests, as I have
no time for extensive testing right now.
Best wishes,
Taco
%\module [
% file=s-map-10.mkii,
% version
. There are both
mkiv and mkii versions, but the mkii version is unsupported
and does not support realfonts mode.
It would be nice if some of you would run tests, as I have
no time for extensive testing right now.
Best wishes,
Taco
s-map-10.mkiis-map-10
I dimly recall discussion of linebreaking after “/”, but have not been able
to retrieve it from the archives.
Can any one point to an explanation of how to make “/” a character that
will admit a following linebreak (without hyphenation) in MKII?
The aim is to break
“….Montreal/Ottawa”, say
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Alan Bowen wrote:
I dimly recall discussion of linebreaking after “/”, but have not been able
to retrieve it from the archives.
Can any one point to an explanation of how to make “/” a character that
will admit a following linebreak (without hyphenation) in MKII?
The aim
able
to retrieve it from the archives.
Can any one point to an explanation of how to make “/” a character that
will admit a following linebreak (without hyphenation) in MKII?
The aim is to break
“….Montreal/Ottawa”, say, into
“ …..Montreal/
Ottawa…...”
(Untested)
Montreal
symbols.
Alan was asking for MkII. \setbreakpoints is only for MkIV.
Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman
...
This behavior is same in MKII and MKIV.
regards
Jan
--
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratnou poštovní aplikací Opery:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
is same in MKII and MKIV.
lucky me
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma
. In mkii everything is fine.
Below is a minimal example showing the issue with
ConTeXt ver: 2012.06.05 09:16 MKIV fmt: 2012.6.5 int: english/english
Best regards: OK
PS: the minimal example is here:
%%% begin bug-link-footnote.tex
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\setupcolors[state=start
I am trying to process a document I wrote in 2009 using mkii. I am
modifying it to work with mkiv.
When I run
context mydoc.tex
the process starts and after some time it stops and shows an asterisk (*)
waiting for a command. I then type in \end, and it resumes. Finally it
ouputs mydoc.pdf
1301 - 1400 of 5546 matches
Mail list logo
