Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks fine, but the next two
numbers have excess space around
gt; \si[per-mode=symbol]{\metre\per\second} produce m/s
> \unit{10 meter per second}
>
>> \si[per-mode=fraction]{\metre\per\second} produce \frac{m}{s}
> I think it is not possible with \unit{}
>
Do you know if there is the project to imp
^3+4x-7$ : \periods[65]
\item $x\mapsto x^2-3$ : \periods[70]
\item $x\mapsto \frac{x^2+x}2$ : \periods[72]
\item $x\mapsto (x-2)^2$ : \periods[69]
\stopitemize
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I'll look into fractions later this week. All the fraction macros of ConTeXt
were based on \genfrac macro from AMSTeX so, in principle, they should behave
in the same manner.
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfra
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> The following works OK also in mkii:
>∑_{i=1}^∞\frac{1}{2^n}
Be careful to note that you are using U+2211 N-ary Summation (∑)
rather than U+03A3 Greek Capital Letter Sigma (Σ).
Note also that Murray Sargent's "n
| feature: fina, script: grek, language: dflt
MtxRun | feature: fina, script: latn, language: aze crt deu mol
rom trk dflt
MtxRun | feature: frac, script: dflt, language: dflt
MtxRun | feature: frac, script: cyrl, language: srb dflt
MtxRun | feature: frac, script: grek, language: dflt
MtxRun
trk dflt
MtxRun | feature: fina, script: dflt, language: dflt
MtxRun | feature: fina, script: cyrl, language: srb dflt
MtxRun | feature: fina, script: grek, language: dflt
MtxRun | feature: fina, script: latn, language: aze crt deu mol
rom trk dflt
MtxRun | feature: frac, script: dflt, lang
mal exp}}
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
>\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
Hi,
without your redefinition of \exp it looks fine (exp is already
defined). Does that solve your problem, or are you doing something
else, and t
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:17 PM Fabrice Couvreur
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> To type my lessons or other, I use the Modern font in 12 pt or 11 pt. I find
> that the subscript notations are a little too big : how can I improve this ?
> Thanks
> Fabrice
>
> \m{ \forall n \in N
On 4/16/2013 1:04 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–04–16 Hans Hagen wrote:
- frac fixed
Thanks.
- fixed more restrictive tex file lookup in run
context s-pre-17.mkiv
still works on my machine. I'm fine with that, just want to let you
know, it might not be the intended behaviour.
On 04/26/2013 08:31 AM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
even though I consider myself a serious Ctx user, Dutch is still Greek
to me.
How about to prompt the user to encode a displayed math, e.g. "b/a2^3"
to be answered "$\frac{b}{a_2^3}$"?
Well, in tha
]
\setupSTEPtexts [framecolor=green]
\setupSTEPlines [alternative=5]
\cell {initial concentration, $C_i$}
\text {$\div C_f$, final concentration}
\cell {diluation factor, $f$}
\text {inverse}
\cell {$\frac{1}{f}$}
\text {$\times V_f$, volume of the volumetric flask}
\cell {pipette volume, $V_p
]
\setupSTEPtexts [framecolor=green]
\setupSTEPlines [alternative=5]
\cell {initial concentration, $C_i$}
\text {$\div C_f$, final concentration}
\cell {diluation factor, $f$}
\text {inverse}
\cell {$\frac{1}{f}$}
\text {$\times V_f$, volume of the volumetric flask}
\cell {pipette volume, $V_p
On 2014–02–09 Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> How can type big integral sign to result looked good?
>
> Here is my example:
>
> \startformula
> \int \frac{P_n(x)}{Q_m(x)} \, \mathrm{d}x, \quad n \stopformula
I don't know how to reduce the space between the integral sign and
possible to make math fences work in a math alignment, e.g.
\definemathfence[something][brace][command=yes]
\startformula
\startmathalignment[n=2,align={middle,middle}]
%This won't work (I didn't expected to work, anyway)
\NC \NC \something{\frac{1}{2} + \NR
\NC \NC x} \NR
\stopmat
:
* oldstyle figures, through 'onum' feature
* text fractions, through 'frac' feature
and:
* sane filenames
As usual, it is available from github:
http://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/downloads
ok, i adapted t
ghtarrow it is processed (?)
>>
>> \starttext
>> The left side with $[Q,R]$ does not show, but the
>> right side with $[Q,R]$ does show, what is happening here ???
>> \startformula
>>
>
> \relax
>
>
>> [ {Q} , {R} ] \rightarrow \frac{1}
Hubertus wrote:
> Hi all again,
> I try to do something like 1/2 with an upper 1 and a lower 2. The code below
> still doesn't quite work.
>
> \def\nfrac#1#2{\leavevmode\kern.1em%
> \raise.5ex\hbox{\scriptsize #1}%
> \kern-.1em/\kern-.15em%
> \lower.25ex\hbox{\scriptsize #2}}
>
Such a mac
t find how to type a bar over a letter in math mode; in LaTeX the
| > command is something like \overset{-}{q}; but ConTeXt doesn't like it:
| >
| > ! Undefined control sequence.
| > l.1869 p(q_1 + \overset
| > {-}{q_2})+q_1 \frac{dp}{dQ} - Cm_1
Sunday, May 30, 2004 Sebastian Sturm wrote:
> OK, I'll try that. At the moment I'm having all kinds of issues with
> nath (even without any preamble at all), like \binom{\frac 12}{a} not
> working, \to, \ot and \otto arrows not adjusting to the lengths of
> their subscr
[ComputerModernSans-Italic] % \stopfontclass
>
> \startfontclass[modern]
> \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [Sans]
> \definefontsynonym [MathItalic] [SansItalic]
> \stopfontclass
>
> % initialize the typeface
>
> \setupbodyfont[modern,ss]
>
> \starttext
> Some text,
>
> > >> Florian
> > >
> > > Hi Florian,
> > >
> > > that does work, thank you very much.
> > > I assume the \setff means something like set font feature. If so, I
> > > could shorten my typescript and only specify the 4 main font
gt; > >> Florian
> > > >
> > > > Hi Florian,
> > > >
> > > > that does work, thank you very much.
> > > > I assume the \setff means something like set font feature. If so, I
> > > > could shorten my typescript and only spec
pbuffer
\setupsubformulas
[conversion=romannumerals]
\startsubformulas[Maxwell]
\placeformula \startformulas
\startformula \startalign
\NC \nabla\cdot\bf E \NC = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}
\NR[Maxwell 1]
\NC \nabla\times\bf E \NC = - \frac{\partial\bf B}{\partial t
On 3/26/2023 4:20 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks
> On 13 Jun 2024, at 21:04, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> I don’t see any pixels in the PDF file when I typeset your code snipet (on
> MacOS 11.7.10). Here is what I get.
>
> Best regards: Otared
>
>
I see it on both - the original and Otared's.
Otared: If open yours (on MacOS 1
Hi,
thank you all for your replies so far. I guess I’ll have to live with that for
now (of course this isn’t really a problem, but a bit unpleasant to look at
when you’re used to the straight lines in LaTeX). Just wanted to add that I can
see this artifacts quite clearly on a 13 inch 1080p scre
-mode=symbol]{\metre\per\second} produce m/s
\unit{10 meter per second}
\si[per-mode=fraction]{\metre\per\second} produce \frac{m}{s}
I think it is not possible with \unit{}
Do you know if there is the project to implement this feature?
currently not on the agenda
slash; something like 1{}^1/_2 to mean one and a half?
\definefontfeature[fraction][frac=yes]
\definehighlight[textfraction][style={\feature[+][fraction]}]
\starttext
\m{1\vfrac{1}{2}}
1\textfraction{1/2}
\stoptext
Wo
ommand=\groupedcommand{}{\nbsp},
after=\textrule]
\setuptextrules[width=0pt,distance=0pt]
\starttext
\startpropriete
Soit \math{q} un réel \math{\neq 1}, alors pour tout entier naturel
\math{n\geqslant 1} on a :
\startformula
S=1+q+q^2+\dots+q^n=\frac{1-q^{n+1}}{1-q}.
\stopf
carefully, but there is nothing special in
\frac. The likely cause is prime is misplaced in cramped style or similar
and similar misplacement will happen whenever that style is used.
I would be weary of using {... \over ...}. At the very least, use
\Ustack{... \over ...}, else any code that uses
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 19:34 -0400, Alan Bowen wrote:
> Adding
>
> \definefontfeature[fraction][frac=yes]
> \definehighlight[textfraction][style={\feature[+][fraction]}]
>
> fixes the problem in the sample just sent.
This, and the font has to have the cor
add a tracing option here
\ifgridsnapping
\directvspacing\v!depth
\else
\kern\dimexpr\strutdp-\prevdepth\relax % <---
\prevdepth\strutdp
\fi
\fi\fi\fi}
\protect
\starttext
\dorecurse{4}{\input knuth\par}
\startformula
\exp(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}
Hi Massi,
\Unskewed is undefined/unrecognized.
Enabling Opentype math (somehow) or perhaps an experimental version of
luatex is needed?
Alan
On Tue, 22 May 2018 18:29:30 +0200
MF wrote:
> Hi Alan, try this:
>
> \def\vFrac#1#2{#1 \Uskewed / #2}
>
> \starttext
> $\frac{2
$\delta$ etex, (3cm,0));
Why not just
label.bot("$\delta$", (3cm,0));
> label.bot(btex $\frac{2-\delta}{2}$ etex, (5cm,0)); %
> \stopbuffer
> \starttext
> \processMPbuffer[delta]
> \stoptext
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dalyoung
> _
mathfraction
> [wfrac]
> [margin=.25em]
>
> \starttext
>
> \startformula
>\wfrac {
>a
>} {
>\frac {
>b
>} {
>
I've noticed the following issue with how high the numerator is placed,
but only when using Palatino:
\setupbodyfont[palatino]
\starttext
\startformula
{3\over4}\quad {1\over2}
\stopformula
\stoptext
The 3 and the 1 sit quite high above the division line, esp. in
comparison with the gap below the
How could I get upright lowercase Greek letters in math formulas
(provided that such a symbol exists, of course)?
Here's a minimal example:
\setupbodyfont[times]
\starttext
$15{\rm\frac{μm}{μs}}$ 15 μs
\stoptext
T
.
Is there a configure to get both of these to occupy three lines?
I use the latest standalone.
/Mikael
\setuplayout[
grid=tolerant,
]
\showgrid
%\setupformulas[
%spacebefore=,
%spaceafter=,
%]
\starttext
\dorecurse{10}{This is a statement. }
\startformula
1+2+\cdots+(n-1)+n=\frac{1+n}{2}n
some font doesn't provide accompanying math glyphs instead of giving
up in the middle of the run? Of course that will give suboptimal
result (in particular everything inside $math$ will be in LM as
opposed to original font), but at least it won't complain about a
missing $\bullet$ and one ca
cture
${1} \Uover {2}$
like the more friendly ${1} \over {2}$ instead of having
$\Uover{1}{2}$
which is more like the \frac structure.
Also a structure like
$\Uover style \textstyle{1}{2}$
seems a little bit far from the usual ConTeXt atmposphere… Would it not be
possible to have
${1} \Uover[
Hi,
I can confirm. The same problem goes with $\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}$.
/Mikael
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:53 PM Jairo A. del Rio
wrote:
> Hi list! Nesting radicals in LMTX give a funny font size compared with
> LuaTeX, which gives the correct output. I cleaned the cache, just in case.
>
\protect
\usetypescript[PalatinoTest]
\setupbodyfont[PalatinoTest,12pt]
\starttext
\input knuth \par
\startformula
\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x
\stopformula
\stoptext
In this case \int and \sum are of the same size, so it appears as a design
choice, and more importantly, we can patch the
;> should behave in the same manner.
>>
>> The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and \tfrac only
>> set the mathstyle before placing the content with the \over primitive.
>
> Then something has been lost in the MkII -> MkIV transition. I am pretty sure
ometxt on my
request, but I don't understand why "one" is the default value now
either.
> % example code
> \setupcolors[state=start]
> \starttext
> \startMPcode
> picture p;
> p := \sometxt{$R_{\mu \nu } - \frac{1}{2} R - \Lambda g_{\mu \nu} =
> \ka
also
thought that delimiters like ( or [ should automatically adjust to the
formula they contain, but (\sum_{something}
\frac{something}{something}) only produces standard parentheses.
Commands like \lbrace or \lbrack work as expected, though.
If these problems are unknown, I can post a small
t; {No more a valid command. Replace {A \over B} with \frac A
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\atop }
>> {No more a valid command. Use array [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] command \string\choose }
>> {No more a valid command. Replace {
ompletecontent
\section{MathÃmatiques}
\[ f(x)= \frac 1x \]
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
were printed, and didn't act as escapes.
Am I missing something in the correct usage, or is support "incomplete"?
This is a sample file, showing how I've been trying to use it:
\useXMLfilter[mml]
\starttext
\startXMLdata
t+3+x+t\neq m\alpha\frac\theta\hbar
\stopXMLdata
\sto
ath]
> \starttext
> \[ e^{\frac{1}{\gamma-1}} \]
> \stoptext
I just hit the same bug working on my PhD thesis :)
Basically, the fix that I implemented to solve the problem with
^^ not working to access arbitrary characters when nath was
active causes this bug. A possible solution (as a quick ha
en my typescript and only specify the 4 main font faces
> > (regular, bold italic, bold-italic) since the fonts all have all the
> > opentype features i need (onum & smcp etc.) And these can be accessed
> > via \setff{feature}, I guess.
>
> Yes, you can define for instanc
has been on my todo list for a long time now. You can
get something by using matrix environments, but then the interline
spacing is not correct. See
http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf page 21.
> 2) It seems that \left and \right cannot be used on separate groups.
> Here is a
hi
(n)$.
\stopmylema
\startmydemo Clarament, per a tot $n \in \naturalnumbers$,
\startformula
\startsplit
\NC \varphi_k (n) \NC = \max \{ \frac{1}{k+1} \sum_{i=0}^k D_{\sigma, g,
h} (t+i) \mid t \in \naturalnumbers, (g, h) \in K_{G, X} (n)\}\NR
\NC \NC \leq \frac{1}{k+1} \sum_{i=0}^k \max \{D_{\sigma
Hi all,
is it possible to subtract a featureset that has been applied to a
fontfamily? MWE:
\definefontfeature
[f:frac]
[frac=yes,onum=no,pnum=no]
\definefontfeature
[f:onum]
[onum=yes,pnum=yes]
\definefontfamily [test] [serif] [AntykwaTorunska] [features=f:onum]
\definefontfamily
_{\mu}% <-- This works, without
accent
%\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{\bar{e}}_{\mu} % <-- This does not work,
with accent
\bar{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}}_{\mu} % <-- This works, but
connector punches through accent
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \f
lts.
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}^{\dot\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}_{\mu}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\bar\sigma^{\dot\alpha\beta}_{\mu}
\stopformula
\stopboxanchoring
\stoptext
anchors-002-copy.pdf
Description: Adobe
\times 12} \over {44 \times 56}}=14.2\ \rm kilo
\stopformula
\stopformulas
\stoptext
Thank you for hinting me how to this correctly.
\frac{...}{...} .. forget about \over
-
Hans Hagen
es]
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> \abs{v} = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> This causes an error, complaining that \abs is undefined. However, workes
> fine with
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2023.02.07 19:06 LMTX fmt: 2023.3.14 int: english/englis
On 3/26/2023 4:20 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks
the new binary. (Thanks, Günter!)
The x86_64-darwinlegacy from that download link version has fixed the problem
on the Mac. Thank-you all involved.
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
gives the attached.
—
in this example:
\starttext
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla bla bla bla
\placeformula
\startformula
K_1 \rightarrow
E(f) = \frac {K_1(f)} { f}\,.
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula
K_1 \rightarrow
\startmathcases
\NC
\int_0^{\ln 2} e^s\,ds$ \stopitem
\startitem $\int_0^{\ln 2} e^{2s}\,ds$ \stopitem
\startitem $\int_0^{\pi} \sin t\,dt$ \stopitem
\startitem $\int_0^{2\pi}\sin t\,dt$ \stopitem
\startitem $\int_0^1\frac{1}{1+x^2}\,dx$ \stopitem
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Wo
On 9/26/2017 11:10 PM, Stephens, Kenny wrote:
\starttext
\startformula
\startmathalignment[m=2,distance=4em]
\NC \text{slope}_A \NC = 0
\NC \text{slope}_B \NC = \frac{1}{2} \NR
\stopmathalignment
\stopformula
\stoptext
In ConTeXt 2017.05.15 (shipped with TexLive 2017), the
e[mathdesign]
> \setupbodyfont[garamond]
>
> \starttext
>
> Some random text and \math{\alpha=\frac{-b}{2a}}
>
> \stoptext
> ==
m in the denominator but a
display-math k in the numerator. The second sqrt is fine.
Is the problem that my plain-TeX habits, from decades using \over,
should be over, and that \frac is the recommended way?
(This is with the 2014.03.27 beta.)
-S
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> How could I get upright lowercase Greek letters in math formulas
>> (provided that such a symbol exists, of course)?
>
> $\mathgreekupright 15{\rm\frac{μm}{μ
to get the width (and
height) of a string back in lua as a value?
So, in lua something like this:
width = tex.widthofstring(“I have a string with some $\frac{1}2{}$ (math) in
it")
G___
If your question is of int
eficios} - \text{\em costes}$.
% you can use typographical variations inside \text: \em, \bf, etc
\item Beneficio por euro: $\frac{\text{\em beneficios}}{\text{\em
costes}}$.
\item Beneficio obtenido el primer año.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
There are additional commands for italic, bold e
lease features also a rudimentary user guide.
> >
> >The text fonts provide to features over STIX fonts:
> >* oldstyle figures, through 'onum' feature
> >* text fractions, through 'frac' feature
>
> and:
>
> * sane filenames
>
> >As us
u want to edit file Source/Terms_and_Concepts/Terms_and_Concepts.tex
at line 120
The line it is referring to is the last line of the following code
snippet:
...
\placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{P(t) = \frac{K P_0 {\it e}^{rt}}
{K + P_0({\it e}^{r
, \strike{two}too!
\stoptext
Don't use {... \over ...} as it will mess up the calculation of math
style. \frac{...}{...} is more robust.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please a
Hey list,
I am trying to typeset the Verhulst equation which contains a Euler
constant which I cannot get to display correctly:
\placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{P(t) = \frac{K P_0 \Eulerconst^{rt}}
{K + P_0(\Eulerconst^{r t} - 1)}}
\stopformula
The
\gamma x) dx = \lim Z → ∞
\stopformula
\egroup
\startformula
\sqrt{34×y\frac{21\alpha^2}{98.0 x_2}}Δθ = \sin(a)^2 + \cos(b)^2
\stopformula
\bgroup\bf
\startformula
\sqrt{34×y\frac{21\alpha^2}{98.0 x_2}}Δθ = \sin(a)^2 + \cos(b)^2
\stopformula
\egroup
\stoptext
)).
So far, Hans has implemented frac and rad for fractions and radicals.
The fractions has been a funny construction, being put inside empty
delimiters, and so surrounded by the \nulldelimiterspace (which has
been set to 1.2pt, independent of font size). Now we have better
control of the spacing
$ \autofences x | \frac{a}{x}$
$ \autofences ( \frac{a}{x} + b | x )$
should also work (lone middles)
Le jeu. 25 août 2022 à 18:18, Hans Hagen via ntg-context
mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> a écrit :
Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. Again some updated math of which details will be
revealed
gt; \Bigl|\int_0^\pi\sin x\,dx\Bigr|,
>> \stopformula
>> Look at the $f$ and the bar:
>> \startformula
>> \Bigl|\int f\Bigr|
>> \stopformula
>> The $x$ seems to be outside the fraction:
>> \startformula
>> \frac{a^2}{1-x}
>> \stopformula
&g
awithnumber[kem-chapter1-eqn1]
\startformula
\startalign
\NC \div \vec{E} \NC = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}\NR[kem-chapter1-eqn1:A][a]
\NC \rot \vec{B} \NC = \mu_{0} \:\vec{j}
\NR[kem-chapter1-eqn1:B][b]
\NC \div \vec{B} \NC = 0\NR[kem-chapter1-eqn1:C][c]
\NC \
or i = 1, 98, 1 do
context(lorum)
end
\stopluacode
\startformula \startmathalignment[n=1]
\NC y = ax \NR
\NC a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \NR
\NC x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} \NR
\stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stopcolumns \stoptext
Adding text after the formula seems to fix the issue, but tha
t\,dt$
\item $\int_0^1\frac{1}{1+x^2}\,dx$
\stopitemize
but only with \startitem ... \stopitem? It is not that I have anything
against using the \start...\stop... mechanism, but just curiosity.
I haven't looked at the code, but most likely reason is that it uses a two
pass mechanism.
] [serif] [myserif] [default]
\usetypescript[myserif]
\setupbodyfont[myserif,rm,12pt]
\starttext
\input zapf
\stoptext
%FILE2: test2.tex
\definefontfeature[minion][language=dflt, script=latn, mode=node,
frac=yes, onum=yes, kern=yes, liga=yes, dlig=yes
,medi=yes,fina=yes,isol=yes,
liga=yes,dlig=yes,rlig=yes,frac=yes,
calt=yes,ccmp=yes,kern=yes,mark=yes,
mkmk=yes,ardi=yes,featurefile=digit.fea]
\font\ara=arabtype*fea at 20pt\ara
\textdir TRT\pardir TRT
بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم
1234567890
\bye
lookup ArabicDigits {
lookupf
also a rudimentary user guide.
The text fonts provide to features over STIX fonts:
* oldstyle figures, through 'onum' feature
* text fractions, through 'frac' feature
and:
* sane filenames
As usual, it is available from github:
http://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/download
Still get a small integral sign in the latest beta (2012.05.26 16:40).
Times works perfectly. Am I doing something wrong here?
\definetypeface[palatino][rm][serif][palatino]
\definetypeface[palatino][mm][math][palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino]
\starttext
\startformula
\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x
Am 25.11.2012 um 02:13 schrieb Kip Warner :
> Hey list,
>
> I am trying to typeset the Verhulst equation which contains a Euler
> constant which I cannot get to display correctly:
>
> \placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
> \startformula
> \math{P(t) = \fr
t arabtype that suggests it, thats the problem; open type fonts
*don't* have any information about what features should be on by
default; it's the renderers that kind of decide it and there is no
standard, so any renderer will follow its own rules
also, some features (like frac) are often
t=1pt,fill=white] {
$\displaystyle \tan \alpha \black =
\frac{{\red \sin \alpha}}{\blue \cos \alpha}$}
(intersection of 0,0--30:1cm and 1,0--1,1) coordinate (t);
\draw (0,0) -- (t);
and the rest should work. I mean: under normal usage, most thi
Hi Steffen,
I don't really know regex, but how does your double brace work with
the following
\footnote{{This $\frac{a}{b^{c+d}}$ is a strange footnote}}
note the double }} in the math formula.
/Micke P
On Jan 21, 2008 3:45 PM, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
&g
. At the moment I'm having all kinds of issues with
nath (even without any preamble at all), like \binom{\frac 12}{a} not
working, \to, \ot and \otto arrows not adjusting to the lengths of
their subscripts, etc... and I can hardly imagine that all of these are
nath bugs, so maybe something
m adp setzt die
beiden letztgenannten Formate ein.
Hier ein Beispiel für den Mathematiksatz von \TeX{}:
\startlinecorrection
\vskip-.5\baselineskip
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathalignment[m=2,distance=2em]%Notice distance=2em
\NC \nabla\cdot \bf E \NC= \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0},
\NC \
):
-
\setupbodyfont[stixtwo]
\starttext
Test ß 1lIjJuQ \% § \& ?! VERSAL-ẞ- \|> --- 1234567890 --- //
\placeformula[eqn:def-m]
\startformula
m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}
\stopformula
\stoptext
-
Unfortunately the compiler throws an error — why is there a check of
b am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
>>>
>>> Very clear !
>>> In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the
>>> best possible result ?
>>>
>>> A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
>> Thank you for your trust, Wo
$z$?)
>>>
>>> There might be more problems (like between $t$ and the parenthesis in
>>> $e^t$) is too small.
>>>
>>> The space between $dx$ and the bar is too small:
>>> \startformula
>>> \Bigl|\int_0^\pi\sin x\,dx\Bigr|,
>>> \stopfo
gt;\begin{equation}
>\begin{split}
>\lefteqn{
> \frac{\partial (\rho (\phi u)_j)}{\partial t}
> + \nabla_k (\rho (\phi u)_k u_j)
>}\quad\quad
>\\
>= &\;
> -\nabla_j (\phi p)
> + \nabla_j (\lambda \nabla_k (\phi u_k))
>
I compile with context the expected result is correct but with lmtx
> the font under the square root is smaller.
> > Thank you
> > Fabrice
> >
> > \protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
> >
> > \starttext
> > \startformula
> >\sqrt{\exp(x)}
tures with otfinfo in the terminal. For example:
iMac:~ voss$ otfinfo -f `kpsewhich LibertinusSerif-Regular.otf`
c2sc Small Capitals From Capitals
calt Contextual Alternates
case Case-Sensitive Forms
ccmp Glyph Composition/Decomposition
cpsp Capital Spacing
dlig Discretionary Liga
not to use this connector, producing unexpected results.
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}^{\dot\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}_{\mu}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\bar\sigma^{\dot\alpha\beta}_{\mu}
\stopformula
\stopboxanchor
Am 13.06.24 um 23:13 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 6/13/2024 10:04 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Ralph,
I don’t see any pixels in the PDF file when I typeset your code snipet
(on MacOS 11.7.10). Here is what I get.
No problems on windows on chrome-os either. Mikael S and I checked it on
has the character, what you want to typeset is the
character U+00BD for 1/2 or, if you want to use mathmode, either of the
solutions below (wtach the slight differences between the three versions):
\starttext
$8\tfrac{1}{2} × 11$ inch
$8\frac{1}{2} × 11$ inch
$8{1 \over 2} × 11$ inch
\stop
On 10/7/2014 7:33 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
\setupmathradical[alternative=default]
Very good!
Hans, will the default be default in next beta? :)
no, but there will be different settings ... the problem with fractions
and radic
or the first files, with no font features specified, it is OK. I
> do not know whether someone else can replicate this problem. But it
> happended on my laptop. All compiled are attached in this email.
\definefontfeature[minion][language=dflt, script=latn, mode=node,
501 - 600 of 756 matches
Mail list logo
