TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | writing option file antrag.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 768
TeXExec | tex engine: pdftex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled.
(d:/context/tex/texmf
document 'antrag.tex'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | writing option file antrag.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 768
TeXExec | tex engine: pdftex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7
The latest beta (Minimals) fails to compile and complains:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled.
(/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/web2c/natural.tcx)
I can't find the format file `cont-en.fmt'!
and
context --version
gets
MTXrun | unknown script
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 20:38, Bowen Alan C. wrote:
The latest beta (Minimals) fails to compile and complains:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled.
(/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/web2c/natural.tcx)
I can't find the format file `cont
Thanks, Mocja. I will play around with it.
Alan
On Apr 30, 2009, at 15;50,10 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 20:38, Bowen Alan C. wrote:
The latest beta (Minimals) fails to compile and complains:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled
1
TeXExec | writing option file handout_longlife.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 553
TeXExec | tex engine: pdftex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled.
(/Users/bonasia/contextexp/tex/texmf-context/web2c/natural.tcx)
I can't find
the abnormal result with MkIV :)
BTW, I found MkII can not work with Minimals 2009.04.28 even though I
had regenerated those formats by context --make --all.
$ texexec --pdf test
..
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 7.5.7)
\write18 enabled.
(/opt/context-new/tex/texmf-context/web2c
texexec --make --all
you can cheat: context --make --pdftex
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53
Hi,
I'm using ConTeXt 2008.10.31 (Mk II) from the Debian unstable packages.
The live context (2009.03.06) produces a blank index with the pdftex
engine, so I'm CC'ing Patrick in case that problem is separate.
The context live is now 2009.04.28. I don't know if this helps, but at
least
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
in short, can you please explain to us why
%engine=xetex
\usetypescript[modern][ec]
Once you explain why you use [ec] ...
because i also run the test for pdftex
2009/4/25 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Am 25.04.2009 um 18:15 schrieb Diego Depaoli:
[I got no answers to my previous post]
With page imposition, in luatex, background overrides text
context --arrange filename
Thanks!
but I'm a bit confused...
in pdftex or xetex
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM, David Arnold dwarnol...@suddenlink.netwrote:
All,
Can someone give me some example code that includes a PSTricks object?
Thanks.
I believe that PSTricks works well in context mkii,
better from TL2007 /TL2008 , so you have dvips pdftex etc that are needed
, so you have dvips pdftex etc that are
needed to work .
It also work with a current ConTeXt but you have to a change a line in
m-pstric.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:36, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Haha ! with this tip I get an error message from 'pdftex' :
libstdc++.so.5 ... No such file ...
Taco, what's the state with this particular library dependency?
Not 100% sure but I think it should be better now
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very slow.
Where con I get the doc or what shall I do ?
Thanks,
--
René Bastian
1 rue du Presbytère
F-67160 Wissembourg
R. Bastian wrote:
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very slow.
what do you do with texexec
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:48:35 +0200
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl scribit:
R. Bastian wrote:
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very slow.
what do you do
the document and some logfile to the mailing list? It may
happen that you run into some infinite loop with one of your macros.
Please also describe what platform you work on. With luatex memory
might also be an issue, but that's probably not the case with pdftex.
I tested 'texexec' on another
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, R. Bastian wrote:
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very slow.
Where con I get the doc or what shall I do ?
I do not know if this is related
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu scribit:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, R. Bastian wrote:
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very
with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very
slow.
Where con I get the doc or what shall I do ?
I do not know if this is related or not...but
Occasionally I also find that texexec is extremely slow. (Takes about a
minute to initiate
,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed with
texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very
slow.
Where con I get the doc or what shall I do ?
I do not know if this is related
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, R. Bastian wrote:
Hi,
I am new on this list. I use pftex and would use ConTeXt installed
with texlive/2007.
'ruby' and 'pdftex' work fine, but 'texexec' (texexec.rb $@) is very
slow.
Where con I get the doc or what shall I do ?
I do not know
}}
% usage inside \sometxt in metapost:
\combine{\textcaron}
But I had no time to debug.
--lua ? don't you use 'context' ? (as context will call texexec when the
topline mentiones pdftex/xetex as engine, i now always use it in calls
from the editor instead of texexec)
if you're in a hurry you
typescripts (math support is missing), I
thought about splitting type-buy in mkii/mkiv files but this will only
help pdfTeX and LuaTeX users but not XeTeX ones.
I think a separate file for XeTeX/LuaTeX only could help (with mkii/
mkiv files for math) or we include them in type-otf if Hans has
-context/tex/context/sample/knuth.tex)
fonts : resetting map file list
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-empty.map}
fonts : using map file: original-base
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.map}
fonts
/sample/knuth.tex)
fonts : resetting map file list
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-empty.map}
fonts : using map file: original-base
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.map}
fonts : using map file
-context/tex/context/sample/knuth.tex)
fonts : resetting map file list
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-empty.map}
fonts : using map file: original-base
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.map}
fonts
define font | unable to define texnansi-lbr as \*lucida12ptmmmrrm*
systems : begin file lucida at line 4
(C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/tex/context/sample/knuth.tex)
fonts : resetting map file list
{C:/contextminimal/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-empty.map
Hi Sanjoy,
I'm using ConTeXt 2008.10.31 (Mk II) from the Debian unstable packages.
The live context (2009.03.06) produces a blank index with the pdftex
engine, so I'm CC'ing Patrick in case that problem is separate.
The context did not receive an update for quite some time. I will take a
look
II) from the Debian unstable packages.
The live context (2009.03.06) produces a blank index with the pdftex
engine, so I'm CC'ing Patrick in case that problem is separate.
\starttext
\startregister[index][Knuth]{Knuth}
\dorecurse{5}{\input knuth }
\stopregister[index][Knuth]
\startregister[index
-otftotfm --disable-pdfopen
--disable-pdftex --disable-ps2eps --disable-ps2pkm --disable-psutils
--disable-seetexk --disable-t1dotlessj --disable-t1lint --disable-t1rawafm
--disable-t1reencode --disable-t1testpage --disable-t1utils --disable-tex
--disable-tex4htk --disable-tpic2pdftex --disable
the problem?
Unlikely. It will remove the error message, though. ;)
Here is the relevant bit of docs:
%D \macros{preparebibrefprefix}
%D
%D The reference list only writes bare references when the criterium
%D is `all'. Otherwise, a prefix is added to make sure that pdfTeX
%D does not encounter
Creator:ConTeXt - 2009.03.23 10:57
Producer: pdfTeX-1.40.9
CreationDate: Fri Apr 10 18:11:36 2009
ModDate:Fri Apr 10 00:00:00 2009
%%% the file %%%
\starttext
$\rightarrow
/tex/context/base/type-otf.tex
(c:/context/tex/
texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv))
system : module plus loaded
(c:/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/m-plus.tex))
system : vimdemo.top loaded
(vimdemo.top)
specials : pdftex loaded
language : language en
On Apr 6, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
Mojca
Hi Mojca,
I usually run a luatex
/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
Mojca
Hi Mojca,
I usually run a luatex binary I have compiled myself, but when I simply
tried to run the script to update the minimals, I got the same error as
Luigi
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:02, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work
nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
Mojca
___
If your question
happened ?
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
You need a different cplusplus runtime. Look for a linux package named
libstdc++5
SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
What's happened ?
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
I don't know
-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686
i686
i386 GNU/Linux
What's happened ?
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your
/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
You need a different cplusplus runtime. Look for a linux package named
libstdc++5 or so something like that. Luatex 0.37 is using a dynamic
stdc++ library (next
nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch.
Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
You need a different cplusplus runtime. Look for a linux package
named
2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686
i686
i386 GNU/Linux
What's happened ?
This has nothing to do with Hans' beta. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your
/gmane.comp.tex.context/48892
but I'm clueless. The binaries have been compiled on Debian Etch. Does
pdfTeX work on your machine?
I don't know -- with minimals
I use only luatex
You don't need to compile the documents to be able to test. Just run
pdftex --version
(unless you excluded it already
--make --all --pdftex
texexec --make --all --xetex
luatools --generate
luatools --ini --compile --verbose cont-en
luatools --ini --compile --verbose cont-de
luatools lmr12.afm
context --generate
---8---schnapp--
--
---it's like this--
even samurai have teddy bears
I'm
getting
an extra first page aug PDF output containing the chars sss e ...
I'm using ConTeXt Minimals (TeXExec | version 6.2.1 - 1997-2009 -
PRAGMA ADE/POD).
Is this a known Problem? Is there a fix for it? I'm not having this
Problem when using
LuaTeX or pdfTeX
6.2.1 - 1997-2009 -
PRAGMA ADE/POD).
Is this a known Problem? Is there a fix for it? I'm not having this
Problem when using
LuaTeX or pdfTeX ...
is this with the latest zip?
-
Hans Hagen
not having this
Problem when using
LuaTeX or pdfTeX ...
Markus
--
---it's like this--
even samurai have teddy bears
and even teddy bears get drunk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
? Is there a fix for it? I'm not having this
Problem when using
LuaTeX or pdfTeX ...
is this with the latest zip?
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt
*runtime:options
% \setupoutput[pdftex]
% \stopsetups
% % styles and modules
% \startsetups *runtime:modules
% \stopsetups
% % done
% \protect \endinput
%
% end of optionfile
%
(test.top)
fonts : preloading latin modern fonts
bodyfont : 12pt rm is loaded
specials : pdftex loaded
language
2009/3/31 Khaled Hosny:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution
to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know
if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries
Version 10.5.6
(1) How do I know if I have font Bera? As in, where on my computer
do I look to
see if I have font Bera installed?
All my typescripts work with XeTeX/LuaTeX only, if you want to use
pdfTeX write
your own typescripts.
You can show a list of all available fonts for LuaTeX
Hello,
I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution
to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know
if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries for minimals.
(I did not update luatex, metapost or xetex, so only pdftex binary
should
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution
to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know
if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries for minimals.
(I did
[rm] into
[ss]. And for mkii (old-fashioned pdftex), I think you'll need to add
the encoding to the typescript:
\starttypescript [Avenir] [texnansi]
\definetypeface [Avenir] [ss] [sans] [avenir] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\stoptypescript
When I try to use my typescript in my
$UNIX2003
Referenced from: /usr/local/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-osx-ppc/bin/texlua
Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
So I must replace the binaries in texmf-osx-ppc/bin... Ok
I can generate formats for pdfTeX and XeTeX without problems.
luatools --generate
(seems ok)
context --make
stops
before the server died this
afternoon:
pdftex SVN #534 is at the latest version already
xetex SVN #820 is at the latest version already
luatex beta-0.36.0 is at the latest version already
metapost 1.102 is at the latest version already
Arthur, will these new binaries be propagated
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 21:43, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
If I interpret the messages from the build script correctly, my computer
managed to upload all binaries before the server died this afternoon:
No.
pdftex SVN #534 is at the latest version already
xetex SVN #820
March 2009 23:41:19 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
LaTeX has a package to do exactly that, fp. You could look into its
code. Or you could use LuaTeX :-)
It's easy to do with etex but I would use lua if possible
Am 21.03.2009 um 23:26 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
LaTeX has a package to do exactly that, fp. You could look into its
code. Or you could use LuaTeX :-)
\startluacode
if tex.dimen[!!dimena] / tex.dimen[!!dimenb] tex.dimen[!!
dimenc
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
I have four dimensions \!!dimena, \!!dimenb, \!!dimenc and \!!dimend,
and I want
depends on what you want to achive as there are many possibilities
\number\dimexp 123pt\relax
\number\dimexp 123pt/65536\relax
Hi,
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
I have four dimensions \!!dimena, \!!dimenb, \!!dimenc and \!!dimend, and
I want
if (dimena/dimenb) (dimenc/dimend)
do something
else
do otherthing
Any hints on how to do this in ConTeXt.
Thanks,
Aditya
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
LaTeX has a package to do exactly that, fp. You could look into its
code. Or you could use LuaTeX :-)
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest
Am 21.03.2009 um 23:26 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
LaTeX has a package to do exactly that, fp. You could look into its
code. Or you could use LuaTeX :-)
It's easy to do with etex but I would use lua if possible.
\starttext
\unprotect
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2009 um 23:26 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
LaTeX has a package to do exactly that, fp. You could look into its
code. Or you could use LuaTeX :-)
It's easy to do with etex but I
Dnia Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:08:41PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan napisa#322;(a):
Hi,
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
I have four dimensions \!!dimena, \!!dimenb, \!!dimenc and \!!dimend, and
I want
if (dimena/dimenb) (dimenc/dimend)
do something
else
do otherthing
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:08:41PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan napisa#322;(a):
Hi,
Can I divide dimensions to get a number in pdftex?
I have four dimensions \!!dimena, \!!dimenb, \!!dimenc and \!!dimend, and
I want
if (dimena/dimenb) (dimenc/dimend
Hi Hans,
can you add command which will print the name (e.g. LuaTeX, pdfTeX ...)
and version (e.g. 0.36.0) of the current used TeX engine.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Wolfgang Schuster schrieb:
Hi Hans,
can you add command which will print the name (e.g. LuaTeX, pdfTeX ...)
and version (e.g. 0.36.0) of the current used TeX engine.
Hi Wolfgang,
I think this should better be done by a command in pdftex/luatex. The
'Procucer' key is already set by pdftex
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I think this should better be done by a command in pdftex/luatex.
No. All engines have multiple version commands already, I see
absolutely no need for yet another version-related primitive.
Best wishes,
Taco
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I think this should better be done by a command in pdftex/luatex.
No. All engines have multiple version commands already, I see
absolutely no need for yet another
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I think this should better be done by a command in pdftex/luatex.
No. All engines have multiple version commands already, I see
absolutely no need for yet another version-related
\pdftexversion/100.\modulonumber{100}\pdftexversion.\pdftexrevision
\or\number\XeTeXversion\XeTeXrevision
\or\number\numexpr\luatexversion/100.\modulonumber{100}\luatexversion.\luatexrevision
\fi}
i'll add something to syst-ini.tex
did you notice that your pdftex is a future version?
i
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
did you notice that your pdftex is a future version?
Why?
terminal: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.7)
document: 1.40.9
Wolfgang
Hi,
this weeks beta ...
-- a couple of bug fixes, some are still pending
-- the context script can recognize files for mkii (first line
directive) and listens to --pdftex and --xetex; it still calls texexec
but this method can replace the texmfstart call (mtxrun is faster); it
also permits
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
did you notice that your pdftex is a future version?
Why?
terminal: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.7)
document: 1.40.9
well, the version macro reported version 2 (i run version
: trylua.top loaded
(trylua.top)
fonts : preloading latin modern fonts
bodyfont : 12pt rm is loaded
specials : pdftex loaded
language : language en is active
system : module tikz loaded
(/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/pgf
/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.tex))
system : trylua.top loaded
(trylua.top)
fonts : preloading latin modern fonts
bodyfont : 12pt rm is loaded
specials : pdftex loaded
language : language en is active
system : module tikz loaded
: pdftex loaded
language : language en is active
system : module tikz loaded
(/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/pgf/frontendlayer/t-tikz.tex
(/Applications/ConTeXtMinimals/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/pgf/basiclayer/t-pgf.tex
(/Applications
get the
following
error.
Users/Name/Library/TeXShop/Engines/ConTeXt-MKIV.engine does not have
the
executable bit set.
This is when only pdftex is selected in the dropdown Typeset menu.
It is true that the instructions on Context Minimals/Mac
Installation page say
that Context should also
-MKIV.engine does not have the
executable bit set.
This is when only pdftex is selected in the dropdown Typeset menu.
It is true that the instructions on Context Minimals/Mac Installation page say
that Context should also be selected in this dropdown Typeset menu. But if I
try to do that, the engine
fairly recently as in, say, 2 months ago, i could typeset that file
without changing anything, that is, it worked with luatex and pdftex
from the minimals and pdtex from texlive 2008.
is this because of the recent addition of the math stuff?
Mohamed
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009
for latex ,etex, pdftex and so on,
but mkiv/luatex in TL2008 are already old .
I think that minimals are updated about every 3/5 months, even less
for minimals-beta .
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest
classical typescripts as those in pdftex and luatex
(see type-otf.tex, type-tmf.tex etc.) - numerous examples spread
around.
A kind-of-dirty, but most simple trick is to just redefine default features:
From font-ini.mkii:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,trep=yes
the extensions were described by certain singular boundary terms at the singular points.
\stopproblem
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.7) (format=cont-en 2009.3.11) 13 MAR 2009 21:37
entering extended mode
\write18 enabled.
(/home/mbana/context-minimals/tex/texmf-context
have absolutely no idea how to make this work in pdftex.
Best wishes,
Taco
runme.tex
Description: TeX document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
- with other fonts
But maybe the problem is elsewhere and I clearly not well understand the
intrications Context - Xetex - pdftex - TeX - texexec... I've search in the
mailinglist archive and in the Wikigarden... Maybe to use something
different than texexec?
Many thanks.
http
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:41, Yue Wang wrote:
Mojca:
This problem is still not fixed. Try to add both kpathsea357.dll
(required by luatex) and kpathsea357-dev.dll (required by pdftex,
xetex, mpost) into your fetch script.
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the reminder and sorry for keeping you
Hi,
One tiny question for those working on Windows (I used to have a
program to track library dependencies, but I forgot which one):
minimals have plenty of binaries like bibtex.exe that are taken from
TeX Live 2008. Any idea which library those binaries depend on?
exescope can do that.
Yue
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:53, Yue Wang wrote:
btw, see also http://www.dependencywalker.com/
Thanks,
The page looks familiar, maybe I have used exactly that program in
past, but the main problem is the dependency of that program itself :)
:) :) It needs windows :) :) :)
I got the reply from
Mojca:
This problem is still not fixed. Try to add both kpathsea357.dll
(required by luatex) and kpathsea357-dev.dll (required by pdftex,
xetex, mpost) into your fetch script.
Yue Wang
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Yue Wang yuleo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. she needs to add that line into her
Am 2009-03-10 um 05:59 schrieb Michail Vidiassov:
/* Offtopic
Is go and get a PostScript 3 printer or use GhostScript, both are
dirt cheap
an answer backed by the collective wisdom of ConTeXt/LuaTeX/pdfTeX
users? */
In my experience no regarding PS3 printers being cheap
%-
With ConTeXt 2009.03.09 (which has t-bib version=2008.12.01) I get
(notice that there is no space after [] and is)
%---
Test []is wrong
%-
The behaviour is the same whether I use pdftex or luatex. There is no
major difference between the two versions of t-bib
Yes. she needs to add that line into her script.
for now you can manually get that from w32tex's luatex-dev package.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Fengnan fnst...@hotmail.com wrote:
When I updated my context minimal earlier today, at the end of the update
process, the cmd window pops up a
cheap
an answer backed by the collective wisdom of ConTeXt/LuaTeX/pdfTeX users?
*/
Sincerely, Michail
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-siz.tex) (/usr/local/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.tex))
system : test2.top loaded
(test2.top)
fonts : preloading latin modern fonts
bodyfont : 12pt rm is loaded
specials : pdftex loaded
language
to write.
mktexlsr: Updating C:/context/tex/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updated C:/context/tex/texmf/ls-R.
mktexlsr: Done.
TeXExec | using tex engine pdftex
TeXExec | using tex format path ./pdftex
TeXExec | unable to make format due to lack of permissions
TeXExec | using mp engine mpost
TeXExec
/texmf-context/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updated C:/context/tex/texmf-context/ls-R.
Cannot open C:/context/tex/texmf-extra/ls-R to write.
mktexlsr: Updating C:/context/tex/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updated C:/context/tex/texmf/ls-R.
mktexlsr: Done.
TeXExec | using tex engine pdftex
TeXExec | using tex format
1201 - 1300 of 3678 matches
Mail list logo
