Hi Taco,
talking about the bib module ... I usually get confused when I cite a
reference in the text but accidentally use the wrong citation key or
have forgotten to put the record into my bib file at all. Instead of
screaming question marks in the pdf output ConTeXt tacidly typesets a
Hi Oliver,
---
The reference in the text appears without any flaw and the list
contains an empty entry! The external bib file doesn't even exist.
Now delete the ams option and at least the bogus list entry will
disappear. However, in the text no trace of any error whatsoever.
That
That is the chicken and egg problem I was talking about.
When the publication list sort order is 'by citation order',
and 'only show cited publications' (as per ams), then \cite
looks at the list to find the number, and the list checks
the \cite order for what to include. All is good if the
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
That is the chicken and egg problem I was talking about.
When the publication list sort order is 'by citation order',
and 'only show cited publications' (as per ams), then \cite
looks at the list to find the number, and the list checks
the \cite order for what to include.
Hi Taco,
talking about the bib module ... I usually get confused when I cite a
reference in the text but accidentally use the wrong citation key or
have forgotten to put the record into my bib file at all. Instead of
screaming question marks in the pdf output ConTeXt tacidly typesets a
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi Taco,
talking about the bib module ... I usually get confused when I cite a
reference in the text but accidentally use the wrong citation key or
have forgotten to put the record into my bib file at all. Instead of
screaming question marks in the pdf
