[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/10/2024 11:48 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 10.03.2024 um 10:46: On 3/10/2024 9:32 AM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: On 3/9/24 16:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 19:39: [...]    

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 10.03.2024 um 10:46: On 3/10/2024 9:32 AM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: On 3/9/24 16:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 19:39: [...]     \enableexperiments[fonts.compact] Which seeems weird to

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-10 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 3/10/24 10:46, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > [...] > using the low level commands > > \glyphscale > \glyphxscale > \glyphyscale > \glyphslant > \glyphweight > > directly can have side efects when at an outer level these are also set, > so you need to accumulate, like > [...] > which you

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-10 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 3/10/2024 9:32 AM, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: On 3/9/24 16:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 19:39: [...] \enableexperiments[fonts.compact] Which seeems weird to me. Or at least, I thought I read that Hans enabled it by

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-10 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 3/9/24 16:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 19:39: >> [...] >>\enableexperiments[fonts.compact] >> >> Which seeems weird to me. Or at least, I thought I read that Hans >> enabled it by default in LMTX. > > AFAIR Hans uses the setting in

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 19:39: On 3/8/24 19:09, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 18:50: [...] LMTX gets b, c and d in slanted form. LuaTeX gets only b and c in slanted form. [...] I get b and d in italic which

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-08 Thread Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
On 3/8/24 19:09, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 18:50: >> [...] >> LMTX gets b, c and d in slanted form. >> >> LuaTeX gets only b and c in slanted form. > [...] > I get b and d in italic which is the expected output. Sorry, my LuaTeX is getting

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-08 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 08.03.24 um 18:50 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context: Dear list, the following latest gets differents results when compiled with MkXL and MkIV (in current latest from 2024.03.05 11:26): \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][TeX Gyre Termes] [features={default, quality},

[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

2024-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 18:50: Dear list, the following latest gets differents results when compiled with MkXL and MkIV (in current latest from 2024.03.05 11:26): \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][TeX Gyre Termes] [features={default, quality},