On Wednesday 06 October 2010 11:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:19, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
wrote:
ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 MKII fmt: 2010.10.5 int: english/english
system : cont-new loaded
(/localhost/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/cont-ne
On 6-10-2010 8:09, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Meanwhile, it looks like I need to reinstall TeXLive 2010 afresh.
No, you just need to remake the formats.
context mkiv will make formats automatically (only mtxrun --generate is
needed if files were added/removed)
-
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:19, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
wrote:
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 MKII fmt: 2010.10.5 int: english/english
>
> system : cont-new loaded
> (/localhost/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/cont-new.tex
>
> FatalError : Your format does not match th
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 03:33 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 04:07, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
If I wanted to fix my broken TeXLive, should I just re-install ConTeXt from
the TeXLive 2010 DVD or should I do a full re-install of the full scheme?
You have two option
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 04:02, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
>
> Can I put minimals in $TEXMFHOME which is ~/texmf on my system? That seems
> to be the place where I can keep stuff newer than TeXLive 2010 without
> conflict. Can minimals function standalone, though, or will I run into
> mismatche
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 04:07, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
>
> If I wanted to fix my broken TeXLive, should I just re-install ConTeXt from
> the TeXLive 2010 DVD or should I do a full re-install of the full scheme?
You have two options:
a) finish what you started
b) reinstall
In case of reins
On 6-10-2010 9:32, Florian Wobbe wrote:
No, you clobbered your TeXLive distro with the current context beta.
normally that would work out ok given that you delete the old base path
and also update luatex binaries, but in 2010 it also demands installing
texmfcnf.lua as we no longer use texmf.
On 6-10-2010 4:02, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 11:15 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
I used to update TeXLive 2009 successfully with this method, however
I ran into the same error when updating TeXLive 2010. As I did not
succeed and could not figure out what caused the
On Oct 6, 2010, at 04:02 , R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 October 2010 11:15 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
>
>> I used to update TeXLive 2009 successfully with this method, however
>> I ran into the same error when updating TeXLive 2010. As I did not
>> succeed and could not figure o
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 12:33 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Thank you. I was searching for that piece of information on the wiki,
but wasn't able to find the right page. I have removed it now to avoid
any further confusion. The instructions were necessary back in 2009
since ConTeXt was seriousl
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 12:36 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Does mtxrun --selfupdate help?
No, it did not for me.
I got the same error after running it.
The last time I tried, context runs sucessfully out of the box in TL.
You only need to do the rsync stuff if you want the latest beta.
If
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 11:15 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
I used to update TeXLive 2009 successfully with this method, however
I ran into the same error when updating TeXLive 2010. As I did not
succeed and could not figure out what caused the error I installed
minimals without problems. I sugges
On 10/5/2010 2:30 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
I remember \setmainfont
and not \setupmainfont
That seems to work. Thank you very much. I appreciate your help.
Tom.
___
If your question is of interest to others as w
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Tom Maynard wrote:
> On 10/5/2010 2:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> Using the font should be as easy as
>
> \usemodule[simplefonts]
> \setupmainfont[Concrete Roman]
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \setupmainfront
>
> l.3 \setupmainfont
> [Con
On 10/5/2010 2:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Using the font should be as easy as
\usemodule[simplefonts]
\setupmainfont[Concrete Roman]
! Undefined control sequence.
\setupmainfront
l.3 \setupmainfont
[Concrete Roman]
?
I spent quite some time yesterday trying to find out
On 5-10-2010 7:03, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
I have used LuaLaTeX with fontspec quite successfully and would like to
try ConTeXt with LuaTeX support in Mk-IV to compare ease of
customization and use.
I am happy to furnish more information if necessary.
Sorry if my query sounds elementar
Does mtxrun --selfupdate help?
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Tom Maynard wrote:
On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
This is the result of the broken TeXLive 2010 installation. It should have
worked out of the box before your failed update attempt. Try again with a
clean TeXLive 2010 or install m
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 19:03, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I am a LaTeX user trying out ConTeXt for the first time. I am running
> TeXLive 2010 (full scheme) on a x86_64-linux platform. I have visited
>
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Running_Mark_IV
>
> and put the instructio
On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Florian Wobbe wrote:
This is the result of the broken TeXLive 2010 installation. It should
have worked out of the box before your failed update attempt. Try
again with a clean TeXLive 2010 or install minimals.
This is the second trap I fell into by following the instruct
On Oct 5, 2010, at 19:54 , R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 October 2010 11:02 PM, David Rogers wrote:
>
> When I do
>
> context first
>
> I get, again among other output, the following at the head and tail of output
> respectively:
>
> ---
> MTXrun | warning: engine mismatch
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 11:02 PM, David Rogers wrote:
"texexec" gives MkII; "context" gives MkIV. I think this may need to be
documented somewhere easier to find for those new to ConTeXt.
Thank you for that.
When I do
context first
I get, again among other output, the following at the he
On 10/5/2010 12:32 PM, David Rogers wrote:
"texexec" gives MkII; "context" gives MkIV. I think this may need to be
documented somewhere easier to find for those new to ConTeXt.
I fell into this trap because either the Beginner's manual or some other
specifically says to run TeXexec instead of
On Oct 5, 2010, at 19:03 , R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I am a LaTeX user trying out ConTeXt for the first time. I am running TeXLive
> 2010 (full scheme) on a x86_64-linux platform. I have visited
>
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Running_Mark_IV
>
> and put the instruct
* R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar [2010-10-05 22:33]:
Dear Folks,
When I compiled a trivial file called first.tex using
texexec first
I got in the output, inter alia,
---
ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 MKII fmt: 2010.10.5 int:
english/english
---
Why am I not seeing Mk-IV yet?
"texexec" gives
Dear Folks,
I am a LaTeX user trying out ConTeXt for the first time. I am running
TeXLive 2010 (full scheme) on a x86_64-linux platform. I have visited
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Running_Mark_IV
and put the instructions there into an executable file:
---
#! /bin/bash
#
# Manual update for
25 matches
Mail list logo
