Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 22-7-2010 5:33, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for your attention. I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45} Does this

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Vnpenguin
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: Hi, Otared Kavian wrote: So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched with the zip file on the Pragma's website.

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Vedran Miletić
2010/7/22 Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: Hi, Otared Kavian wrote: So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-7-2010 8:59, Vedran Miletić wrote: 2010/7/22 Vnpenguinvnpeng...@vnoss.org: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwatert...@elvenkind.com wrote: Hi, Otared Kavian wrote: So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason context.tex (and maybe a few

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hans Hagen wrote: you shouldn't run mp 1.5 as it's a quite experimental version, the prelude to 2.0; the error is probably related to the fact that formats are no longer dealt with in the same way I don't think minimal (beta) users have a choice in the matter at the moment. Best wishes,

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi, Hans Hagen wrote: the error is probably related to the fact that formats are no longer dealt with in the same way Actually, this particular warning is a glitch in itself, it seems a (quite harmless) case of forgetting to clear the condition state. Nevertheless, there are numerous other

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-7-2010 9:47, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hi, Hans Hagen wrote: the error is probably related to the fact that formats are no longer dealt with in the same way Actually, this particular warning is a glitch in itself, it seems a (quite harmless) case of forgetting to clear the condition

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-07-22 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote: Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32 version), but the version is alway the same: sure, as i didn't update context for a week this exchange you should be archieved in

[NTG-context] beta: pdfboxes missing

2010-04-07 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, no more trimbox and cropbox here. example is \nopdfcompression \starttext\null\stoptext MTXrun | current version: 2010.04.07 14:19 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.60.0-2010040410 (rev 3591) This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.60.0-2010040521 (rev 3596) [minimals] best wishes, Peter

Re: [NTG-context] beta: pdfboxes missing

2010-04-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7-4-2010 4:34, Peter Rolf wrote: \nopdfcompression \starttext\null\stoptext i'll send you a patch - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The

[NTG-context] beta: math problem (mkiv)

2010-03-30 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, I just tried the latest beta and run into this error... [..] (C:/tmp/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/user/cont-sys.rme (C:/tmp/context/ tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-def.mkiv) (C:/tmp/context/tex/texmf-cont ext/tex/context/base/type-lua.tex)

[NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29. Now with the latest release, that is ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english there is an issue with \dots: mkiv considers that this should be in mathmode, while until yesterday it

Re: [NTG-context] beta: math problem (mkiv)

2010-03-30 Thread Otared Kavian
On 30 mars 2010, at 14:07, Peter Rolf wrote: […] ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set. l.3 $\downarrow$ […] test is simply \starttext $\downarrow$ \stoptext Peter Hi Peter, I just ran into the same issue but with $\to$: I was going to report the bug when I

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-3-2010 16:48, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29. Now with the latest release, that is ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english there is an issue with \dots: mkiv considers that this should be

Re: [NTG-context] beta: math problem (mkiv)

2010-03-30 Thread Peter Rolf
Am 30.03.2010 17:15, schrieb Otared Kavian: On 30 mars 2010, at 14:07, Peter Rolf wrote: […] ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set. l.3 $\downarrow$ […] test is simply \starttext $\downarrow$ \stoptext Peter Hi Peter, I just ran into the same issue but

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 30.03.10 16:48, schrieb Otared Kavian: Hi Hans, Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29. Now with the latest release, that is ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english there is an issue with \dots: mkiv considers that this should be

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: did you run luatools --generate before making a format? i moved some math font related issues to other files so that can be a reason Well, something is fishy in the math font department with the latest beta. With one of my own typescripts, I

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-3-2010 18:06, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: did you run luatools --generate before making a format? i moved some math font related issues to other files so that can be a reason Well, something is fishy in the math font department with the

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Otared Kavian
On 30 mars 2010, at 17:41, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 30.03.10 16:48, schrieb Otared Kavian: Hi Hans, Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29. Now with the latest release, that is ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english there

Re: [NTG-context] beta: math problem (mkiv)

2010-03-30 Thread Otared Kavian
On 30 mars 2010, at 17:41, Peter Rolf wrote: […]Hi Otared, it's just an undefined definition (\Umathquad) \let\Umathquad\quad works here (donno if this 'messes' up spacing in math) Best wishes, Peter __ Thanks Peter, I tried your suggestion, but here I did not get what was

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-3-2010 19:06, Otared Kavian wrote: As Thomas Schmitz points out it may be a matter of math fonts. i just uploaded a new version - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 30, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: i see, some files are missing in the zip (and as i have them in my dev path it goes unnoticed when i do a run) i'll make a newer beta Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the same errors. Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-3-2010 19:15, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 30, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: i see, some files are missing in the zip (and as i have them in my dev path it goes unnoticed when i do a run) i'll make a newer beta Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the

Re: [NTG-context] beta: math problem (mkiv)

2010-03-30 Thread Peter Rolf
fixed in latest beta. Thanks Hans! MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.30 18:56 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032921 (rev 3561) Am 30.03.2010 14:07, schrieb Peter Rolf: Hi, I just tried the latest beta and run into this error... [..]

Re: [NTG-context] Beta 2010.03.30: mkiv and \dots

2010-03-30 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 30-3-2010 19:15, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the same errors. will take till 20.00 before the garden is in sync You're right, of course, the warnings have disappeared now! Thanks Hans.

[NTG-context] Beta version 2010.03.29 18:49: mkiv broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi all, After reading a message of Hans to Wolfgang Schuster, saying that there was a new beta, I updated the minimals as usual, and it seems that mkiv is broken now, while mkii works fine: ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.29 18:49 MKII fmt: 2010.3.29 int: english/english Has something changed in

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \underbar is broken (mkiv)

2010-03-23 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hans Hagen wrote: On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the underbar line is drawn vertically here. \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} \stoptext MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213 (rev 3535) looks like a but in luatex ... when

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \underbar is broken (mkiv)

2010-03-23 Thread Peter Rolf
Am 23.03.2010 11:02, schrieb Taco Hoekwater: Hans Hagen wrote: On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the underbar line is drawn vertically here. \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} \stoptext MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213

[NTG-context] beta: \underbar is broken (mkiv)

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, the underbar line is drawn vertically here. \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} \stoptext MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213 (rev 3535) Peter ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \underbar is broken (mkiv)

2010-03-22 Thread Hans van der Meer
Just checked here in ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.21 int: english/ english Can confirm that: \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} gives vertical bar, but the following (note the blank line after starttext) does not. \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} met vriendelijke groet

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \underbar is broken (mkiv)

2010-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the underbar line is drawn vertically here. \starttext sonder\underbar{bar} \stoptext MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213 (rev 3535) looks like a but in luatex ... when i use a long word we get a

[NTG-context] beta: framecolor bug (mkiv)

2010-03-08 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, strange little bug. packed example is attached. MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.02 12:34 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.51.0-2010030811 (rev 3445) Best wishes, Peter \setupcolors[state=start] \setuppagenumber[state=stop] % 'frame=off' : next frame is set to red, if its framecolor is

[NTG-context] beta

2010-01-26 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, The latest beta has a few more fonts defined in type-otf.mkiv. YOu can do things like \setupbodyfont[mscore,ss,10pt] \setupbodyfont[liberation,rm,10pt] as mscore and liberations are yet unknown the related typescript will be loaded automatically (new feature). Hans

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-01-26 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Thanks!!! The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not lead to this) The latest beta has a few more fonts defined in type-otf.mkiv. YOu can do things like \setupbodyfont[mscore,ss,10pt] Happy

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 26.01.10 19:56, schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky: Thanks!!! The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not lead to this) You used the same font (e.g. Arial) in both tests? Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2010-01-26 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Hi Thanks!!! The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not lead to this) You used the same font (e.g. Arial) in both tests? Arial too, but first of all Times New Roman. Vyatcheslav

[NTG-context] beta

2010-01-22 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I uploaded a new beta. The most important new feature is that nested footnotes are working better now (like notes in tabulate). For the moment this is not enabled by default. Use \automigrateinserts if needed. Test case: \chapter{What a notes \footnote{1} \footnote{2} \footnote{3}

[NTG-context] (beta) underbar in mkiv

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to only one char of a word. Example attached. I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :) MTXrun | current version: 2009.11.07 17:59 Best wishes, Peter \starttext underbar the b from

Re: [NTG-context] (beta) underbar in mkiv

2009-11-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to only one char of a word. Example attached. I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :) ok, i need to discuss this with taco quick hack: \let\normalunderbar\underbar

Re: [NTG-context] (beta) underbar in mkiv

2009-11-09 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to only one char of a word. Example attached. I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :) ok, i need to discuss this with taco There was a luatex bug. Fix is in

Re: [NTG-context] (beta) underbar in mkiv

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Rolf
bedankt :) Taco Hoekwater schrieb: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to only one char of a word. Example attached. I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :) ok, i need to discuss

[NTG-context] (beta) figurelibrary broken

2009-11-03 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, test file is again test-001.tex from contexttest. Log attached. MTXrun | current version: 2009.11.02 21:31 This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.44.0-2009110309 Best wishes, Peter (test-001.tex ConTeXt ver: 2009.11.02 21:31 MKIV fmt: 2009.11.3 int: english/english system : cont-new

[NTG-context] beta: \dopresetsymbol

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield (scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined. Peter ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \dopresetsymbol

2009-08-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield (scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined. can you make a small example - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \dopresetsymbol

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield (scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined. can you make a small example yep! seems to be used with tooltips, as the attached example breaks with the same error.

Re: [NTG-context] beta: \dopresetsymbol

2009-08-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield (scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined. can you make a small example yep! seems to be used with tooltips, as the attached example breaks with the same error. there were a

[NTG-context] beta

2009-07-22 Thread Hans Hagen
I uploaded a beta with last days fixes; probably an updated current tomorrow. -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038

[NTG-context] beta (2009-06-01): footnote marker not moved

2009-06-02 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, this is still not fixed. In mkiv the marker (asterisk) is not moved with it's corresponding footnote text. Best wishes, Peter \def\NoteNumber#1{\hbox to 15pt{\hfill\black #1}} \setupfootnotes [bodyfont=6pt, textcolor=black, before=,after=, rule=off, numberconversion={set

[NTG-context] beta

2009-05-28 Thread Hans Hagen
i uploaded a bet awidt a couple of structure fixes -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74

[NTG-context] Beta version 2009.05.27 16:26, \footnote and \section

2009-05-27 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, The issue I reported some time ago regarding \scetion and \footnote with mkiv, is still there: mkiv, LuaTeX version 40, LuaTeX revision 1, (LuaTeX date stamp 2009050813), ConTeXt version 2009.05.27 16:26. The issue is as follows: the text of the \footnote used in the title of a

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been posted several times, but we never heard back about them. weren't you going to make me a zip? -

Re: [NTG-context] Beta version 2009.05.27 16:26, \footnote and \section

2009-05-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, The issue I reported some time ago regarding \scetion and \footnote with mkiv, is still there: mkiv, LuaTeX version 40, LuaTeX revision 1, (LuaTeX date stamp 2009050813), ConTeXt version 2009.05.27 16:26. ok, solved in next beta

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-27 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On May 27, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been posted several times, but we never heard back about them. weren't you going to make me a zip? Will do during the weekend. (I'm at a conference in Belgium

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-27 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On May 27, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been posted several times, but we never heard back about them. weren't you going to make me a zip? Will do during the weekend. (I'm

Re: [NTG-context] Beta version 2009.05.27 16:26, \footnote and \section

2009-05-27 Thread Otared Kavian
On 27 mai 09, at 23:25, Hans Hagen wrote: […] ok, solved in next beta Thanks for your attention: I will test that beta. Best regards: OK ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

[NTG-context] beta (22.05.2009, late night edition): spurious space when clipping

2009-05-22 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, the attached example shows some horizontal shift of the clipped object. Mkii works as expected. Best wishes, Peter \setupcolors[state=start] \setuppagenumber[state=stop] \starttext \framed[offset=overlay,width=5cm,height=1cm] {\clip[width=5cm,height=1cm,voffset=0pt,hoffset=0pt]

Re: [NTG-context] beta (22.05.2009, late night edition): spurious space when clipping

2009-05-22 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the attached example shows some horizontal shift of the clipped object. Mkii works as expected. meta-ini.mkiv, add percent sign ... \else \xdef\MPclippath{#5}% \fi -

Re: [NTG-context] beta (22.05.2009, late night edition): spurious space when clipping

2009-05-22 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, the attached example shows some horizontal shift of the clipped object. Mkii works as expected. meta-ini.mkiv, add percent sign ... \else \xdef\MPclippath{#5}% \fi that was fast! thank you Hans!

[NTG-context] beta (22.05.2009,9:27): textext broken in mkii?

2009-05-22 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, I get a ruby script error (and no graphic), if I use the attached example with pdftex. [..] (./textext.tuo)TeXExec | processing graphic 'textext-mpgraph' r:/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/ruby/base/tex.rb:2108:in `doruntexmp'TeXExec | option 'batchmode' is set to 'true' TeXExec |

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On May 20, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure related bugs ...), only a few. For those who keep an eye on the source ... i'm rewriting ppchtex and it will be integral part of the core of mkiv (so that we have

Re: [NTG-context] beta (list of bugs)

2009-05-21 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:57:37 Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: OK, here is a collection of some assorted bugs. Most of them have been posted several times. Of course, everybody will have their own feeling of what is more and what is less urgent, but I will just add a few words about my own

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: 1. bib-module Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this is a showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this does not work. I feel sorry for you, but I do not know what to do about it anymore.

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi Taco, On May 21, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: 1. bib-module Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this is a showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this does not work. I feel sorry for you, but I do not know what to do about it

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Mohamed Bana
Taco, hi, could you please include a feature that allows listing the set of pages that an item was cited on, I'm sure this is present in LaTeX. Mohamed 2009/5/21 Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: 1. bib-module Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta.

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:17:50 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: 1. bib-module Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this is a showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this does not work. I feel sorry for you, but I do not know

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Mohamed Bana wrote: Taco, hi, could you please include a feature that allows listing the set of pages that an item was cited on, I'm sure this is present in LaTeX. As I can't even get the core functionality working, this is a very bad moment for feature requests, but I'll keep this in mind

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-21 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: 2. Section numbers in markings are duplicated fixed in next beta (marks got a prefix) 3. trep and tlig features don't work in node mode hm, i gave it another try ... also in next beta ... is bit tricky as this is a feature that does not fall in some script/lang

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-20 Thread Hans Hagen
Dohyun Kim wrote: 2009/5/20 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: Hi, I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure related bugs ...), only a few. Let me raise several issues about luatex-plain. thanks for the detailed report .. i'm at the ntg meeting today so will look

[NTG-context] beta

2009-05-19 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure related bugs ...), only a few. For those who keep an eye on the source ... i'm rewriting ppchtex and it will be integral part of the core of mkiv (so that we have chemistry on board). It's not yet finished but i'm

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-19 Thread Dohyun Kim
2009/5/20 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: Hi, I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure related bugs ...), only a few. Let me raise several issues about luatex-plain. First, newly released beta breaks luatex-plain, because luat-sto.lua is not included in

[NTG-context] Beta 2009.05.20 00:02, \footnote and \section

2009-05-19 Thread Otared Kavian
On 20 mai 09, at 00:13, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure related bugs ...), only a few. […] Hans Hi Hans, I noticed that a small issue is still there with \scetion \footnote with mkiv, ConTeXt ver: 2009.05.20 00:02 MKIV

[NTG-context] beta (14.05.2009,16:44): PDF layer

2009-05-15 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, as already mentioned there is a problem with PDF layer... or with the way I use them. This is an old example, so it's maybe outdated. Both marks produce non valid PDF here. \setupcolors[state=start] \setupinteraction[state=start] \pdfcompresslevel0

Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is this intended?

Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is

Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in

Re: [NTG-context] beta (12.05.2009, 22:36): footnote marker and overprinting

2009-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, just in case this slipped someone's mind :) I still get an error about an undefined control sequence (\PDFobjectreferenceB) and the footnote marker (star) is not moved with the footnote (\moveright). The attached example code (with overprinting) breaks with the

Re: [NTG-context] beta (12.05.2009, 22:36): footnote marker and overprinting

2009-05-14 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, just in case this slipped someone's mind :) I still get an error about an undefined control sequence (\PDFobjectreferenceB) and the footnote marker (star) is not moved with the footnote (\moveright). The attached example code (with overprinting)

[NTG-context] beta (12.05.2009, 22:36): footnote marker and overprinting

2009-05-13 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, just in case this slipped someone's mind :) I still get an error about an undefined control sequence (\PDFobjectreferenceB) and the footnote marker (star) is not moved with the footnote (\moveright). The attached example code (with overprinting) breaks with the mentioned error. The

[NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-13 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is this intended? Minimal example and

[NTG-context] beta

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, i uploaded a beta with some fixes Hans -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 |

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-11 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2009-05-11 um 11:14 schrieb Hans Hagen: i uploaded a beta with some fixes Minimals have version 2009.05.11 10:51, is that the one? The footnote bugs still remain in that (no marks, no bypage). Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/

[NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three problems it is pretty short :) 1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1) 2. the footnote marker is not bound to the footnote

Re: [NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three problems it is pretty short :) 1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1) 2. the footnote marker is not bound

Re: [NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three problems it is pretty short :) 1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1) 2. the footnote

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-05-11 Thread Wei-Wei Guo
Hans Hagen 写道: i uploaded a beta with some fixes The following bug is still there. ! Argument of \dotripletestemptyx has an extra }. inserted text \par to be read again } \doif #1#2-\edef \!!stringa {#1} \edef \!!stringb

Re: [NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2009-05-11 um 13:05 schrieb Peter Rolf: there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three problems it is pretty short :) 1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1) That's only

Re: [NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Indeed there is something going wrong with footnotes, and maybe the following remark may help fix the issue. It works (for me…) in the following example (note the \sction command commented out): %%% begin basic-test.tex \starttext This file has been typeset on \currentdate{} at

Re: [NTG-context] beta (2009-05-11)

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three problems it is pretty short :) 1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1) in mkiv conversion has become

Re: [NTG-context] beta (11.05.2009): hex colors in mkii

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I get is black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)... I see a red door and I want it painted black No colors anymore I want them to turn black ... Minimal example:

Re: [NTG-context] beta (11.05.2009): hex colors in mkii

2009-05-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I get is black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)... I see a red door and I want it painted black No colors anymore I want them to turn black ... Minimal example:

Re: [NTG-context] beta (11.05.2009): hex colors in mkii

2009-05-11 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I get is black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)... I see a red door and I want it painted black No colors anymore I want them to turn black ...

[NTG-context] beta (11.05.2009): js interaction

2009-05-11 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, some problems with js interaction stuff. I get ! Undefined control sequence. \dopresetfieldsymbol #1-\checkobjectreferences for nearly all interaction fields in mkiv. Mkii compiles, but the pop-up tooltip is only a black box (not the text 'tooltip'). I also had some problems with PDF

Re: [NTG-context] beta (11.05.2009): js interaction

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, some problems with js interaction stuff. I get ! Undefined control sequence. \dopresetfieldsymbol #1-\checkobjectreferences for nearly all interaction fields in mkiv. Mkii compiles, but the pop-up tooltip is only a black box (not the text 'tooltip'). I also had some

Re: [NTG-context] beta (21.04.2008)

2009-05-08 Thread Peter Rolf
Peter Rolf schrieb: Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, finally found some time to test the latest beta. I get a couple of undefined control sequences here (mkiv). \doPDFpageattribute \doPDFaddtocatalog \PDFobjectreferenceB (overprinting) i have been fizing some issues so maybe a

Re: [NTG-context] beta (21.04.2008)

2009-05-08 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Peter Rolf schrieb: Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, finally found some time to test the latest beta. I get a couple of undefined control sequences here (mkiv). \doPDFpageattribute \doPDFaddtocatalog \PDFobjectreferenceB (overprinting) i have been fizing some

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-04-29 Thread Yanrui Li
2009/4/28 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: As I'm redoing the backend as well as cross referencing some interaction features might be broken but normally they are easy to fix (once i know what fails). So, best collect all bugs while i'm away so that i can deal with then at once. The numbering of

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-04-29 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Yanrui, I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv (ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int: english/english). Best regards: OK On 29 avr. 09, at 16:00, Yanrui Li wrote: 2009/4/28 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: As I'm redoing the backend as

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-04-29 Thread Yanrui Li
2009/4/29 Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: Hi Yanrui, I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv (ConTeXt  ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV  fmt: 2009.4.25  int: english/english). Hi Otared, When you would update to Minimals 2009.04.28 08:46, maybe you can get the

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-04-29 Thread Otared Kavian
On 29 avr. 09, at 18:37, Yanrui Li wrote: 2009/4/29 Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: Hi Yanrui, I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv (ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int: english/ english). Hi Otared, When you would update to

Re: [NTG-context] beta

2009-04-29 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Yanrui Li wrote: 2009/4/29 Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: Hi Yanrui, I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv (ConTeXt  ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV  fmt: 2009.4.25  int: english/english). Hi Otared, When you would update to Minimals

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >