Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:21 PM, wrote: > Hi Simone, > > Thanks for the help, it appears using nprobe on the rpi has given us > correct results. > ok, nice > > We did notice that if using a symbol ($) in the password for > --zmq-encrypt-pwd it would cause it to

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, Thanks for the help, it appears using nprobe on the rpi has given us correct results. We did notice that if using a symbol ($) in the password for --zmq-encrypt-pwd it would cause it to crash and report that it wasn't able to decrypt correctly. Is using a symbol in the

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, see below On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 3:46 PM, wrote: > Hi Simone, > > We've tried running the raspberry pi "offsite" (on a different network > range) to see if the results retrieved to the windows laptop would be more > accurate but they weren't. Please see the

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, We've tried running the raspberry pi "offsite" (on a different network range) to see if the results retrieved to the windows laptop would be more accurate but they weren't. Please see the screenshots below: Raspberry Pi Terminal and Web interface (monitoring bridged network

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, see below On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:04 PM, wrote: > Hi Simone, > > We've been able to get ntopng to work by bridging the two ethernet > interfaces using the raspbian operating system instead of through ntopng. > > We're able to get the correct data by running the

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, We've been able to get ntopng to work by bridging the two ethernet interfaces using the raspbian operating system instead of through ntopng. We're able to get the correct data by running the following command line: ntopng -i br0 -m "192.168.99.0/24" We're now trying to get

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Thank you Simone, We have a PI3 up and running with ntopng. Though testing late tonight with bridging it didnt not flow the data through to the lan side clients. Will test again tomorrow. I just wanted to confirm if bridging is only in the licensed version? As per

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM, wrote: > > Hi Simone, > > -Would the PI3 would be OK for a full 24mbps ADSL2+ connection if placed > between the modem and the first switch in series at full speed? > I would say yes although I recommend you to do some testing. > >

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, -Would the PI3 would be OK for a full 24mbps ADSL2+ connection if placed between the modem and the first switch in series at full speed? -I understand the PI3 would work using mirror port on the switch, but for customers without a managed switch what steps, if any are required

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 4:10 PM, wrote: > Thank you very much Simone, > > Currently we are not using nProbe and did not see any SMB traffic. I will > test this again on Monday but we have the ntopng installed on a 20+ PC > network and did not see any SMB traffic. > >

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, see below inserted reply On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:30 AM, wrote: > Hi Simone, > > Thank you again for your time. > > We have defined the local network and also the correct adapter on the > service. We now have usable current data. Though we do notice ntop does not >

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, Thank you again for your time. We have defined the local network and also the correct adapter on the service. We now have usable current data. Though we do notice ntop does not seem to be capturing any local SMB traffic. So if we copy a large file from 1 PC to another on the

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, see below On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:42 AM, wrote: > Hi Simone, > > Thank you for your time. > > Thank you. We would like the best possible data from the capture so we > should at least check the outcome using nProbe. > > We are using version 2.4.270616 > > I had a

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi Simone, Thank you for your time. Thank you. We would like the best possible data from the capture so we should at least check the outcome using nProbe. We are using version 2.4.270616 I had a look through the interface to see if any configuration needed to be pointed to local network.

Re: [Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi, please see below On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:05 AM, wrote: > Hi All, > > We would like to use ntopng installed on a windows laptop connected to a > mirror port on a network switch to monitor and report on network traffic to > determine issues across the network. > >

[Ntop] Confusion on if nProbe is required

Hi All, We would like to use ntopng installed on a windows laptop connected to a mirror port on a network switch to monitor and report on network traffic to determine issues across the network. Using ntopng connected to a switch port with mirror configured; is nProbe required? We appear