RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

+1 -Original Message- From: Vincent Medina [mailto:vmed...@apcn.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? Full day no problem on my pre. You have to turn off the gmail update every 5 min and set it to as it arriv

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Seriously, who needs hotsync? I have been using Palm for 5 years, since the Treo 600. Never used/need hotsync. The pre mounts as a USB Drive. If you need to sync, you can use SyncBack with a serial number recognition to sync when mounted. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Chapura's app is required for personal use, not business use. EAS is for business use. In H2 2009 Good Messaging will also be supporting the Pre. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Remember the iPhone didn't have apps for over a year... The pre already has 30 -Original Message- From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? But those are the most fun.

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

There are ways to connect it to desktop only Outlook. From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? That's assuming that every Pre user is goin

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

Joey, have you ever been in a... in a Turkish prison? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw It's white with a red strip down the side

RE: UAC--argh...

UAC doesn't apply to the built-in administrator account (the 500 SID). If the box was a DC, then the "Administrator" account would be the Domain\Administrator account. Otherwise, I can't think of why you'd not be seeing UAC prompts... Cheers Ken From: Jeremy Anderson [mailto:jer...@mapiadmin.n

Re: UAC--argh...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: > So question on disabling AAM—Wouldn’t that defeat the “malware protection” > component of UAC ... That assumes that, the unknown admin, having been conditioned to click "Allow" every time it pops up -- because it pops up constantly durin

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

It's white with a red strip down the side and it looks like big Tylenol! Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw Joey... do you movies abo

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

*like -sc From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw Joey... do you movies about gladiators...? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

Joey... do you movies about gladiators...? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw Looks like I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing gl

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

Looks like I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing glue. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw You can tell me... I'm a doctor. -sc ~

RE: Keeping us employed (link)

But jealous none the less.. Shook From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Keeping us employed (link) If it is I wouldn't at all be shocked... :P On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare mailto:scaes...@ca

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

Ditto, for all that they are worth, and all the good that they do. I'll discontinue this on the list, however. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 19:04, Jonathan Link wrote: > I do try and live a life that values others, whether I agree or disagree > with them. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Kurt Buff

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

I do try and live a life that values others, whether I agree or disagree with them. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Why? Don't tell me you think he was actually a friend of the working > man, or of freedom, for very clearly neither is the case. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17:23, Jonathan Link wrote: >> Reprehensible. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Why? It's "very clearly" -- to use your phase -- "deserving of reproof, rebuke, or censure" (how my dictionary defines "reprehensible"). -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoi

Re: Keeping us employed (link)

If it is I wouldn't at all be shocked... :P On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Is that something TVK or Webster take care of for him? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:59 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues

RE: [OT] We Choose The Moon

This is degenerating into political opinion. Whether FDR was a "friend of the working man" is pure opinion - for every point someone might bring up, someone else can bring up a counter point. Whether you agree with FDR's politics or not, he did manage to get re-elected 3 times, so at least a fa

RE: Keeping us employed (link)

Is that something TVK or Webster take care of for him? -sc From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Keeping us employed (link) Judging by Shookies clan, Day 0 is not a problem in his homestead... :P On Wed

RE: Keeping us employed (link)

And *Other*? -sc From: David [mailto:blazer...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Keeping us employed (link) Actually, according to Facebook, he's in Paris (not Texas). On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

Why? Don't tell me you think he was actually a friend of the working man, or of freedom, for very clearly neither is the case. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17:23, Jonathan Link wrote: > Reprehensible. > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> >> Yes, but the one in 1945 is the d

RE: ESXi 4.0 is free... the Client isn't!?

Ya, but you can use the free VI Client (not the for-pay VI stuff) to manage those ESXi servers for which you got a free license code. Sounds like the OP is saying there is no 4.0 equiv. to a standalone VI Client? Ugly. -sc -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

You can tell me... I'm a doctor. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw I can't answer that; you're on a need to know basis. Shook

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Hot water heater? -sc From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Frozen Tundra. From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:42

RE: Who deleted files

*shudder* -sc From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who deleted files The other option is something like tripwire... From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert.lebl...@aanmpc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15,

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

+1 On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > Reprehensible. > >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Yes, but the one in 1945 is the day FDR died - I just wish it had been >> about 12 years earlier. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!

Re: We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: >>   Needs Flash 10.  Doesn't seem to like Firefox. > > Seems to run fine in Firefox 3.5. Yah, oddly enough, it's working fine on my Linux box at home; it just didn't like Firefox on my Win XP station at work. Maybe something about our

RE: Who deleted files

Had to do this recently and wanted to minimize the noise, turned on auditing for failure only and added a new ACE to the directory with only one entry, deny delete for everyone. Might not work for all situations but if you are trying to catch the mysterious disappearing files that none of the users

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

This is very cool. I'll be watching this site daily.. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > This year is the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11 -- the first time a > human being set foot on another world. > > The JFK Presidential Library has a website which is providing a > real-

RE: Any WebSense Gurus?

We have the DC Agent setup and it needs to be able to contact each DC to determine logon status of the users. I believe it's in how you configure the agent, our setup requires that a user be authenticated within x period of time to be authorized to get through. Don't know what x is as I'm the AD gu

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

Reprehensible. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > > > Yes, but the one in 1945 is the day FDR died - I just wish it had been > about 12 years earlier. > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Keeping us employed (link)

Judging by Shookies clan, Day 0 is not a problem in his homestead... :P On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Where’s Dean when I need him? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:53 PM > > *To:* NT System

Re: Keeping us employed (link)

Actually, according to Facebook, he's in Paris (not Texas). On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Where’s Dean when I need him? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:53 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issu

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 16:40, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >>>  What, no love for 12 April?  ;-) >> >> Well, it was a good day in 1945, but otherwise not so much. Heh. > >  Well, Yuri G. was the first human in space, and the first manned > orbit, even if the

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >>  What, no love for 12 April?  ;-) > > Well, it was a good day in 1945, but otherwise not so much. Heh. Well, Yuri G. was the first human in space, and the first manned orbit, even if the USSR lied about the landing. I believe in giving credit

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

Thanks for the link. Just clicked frantically in Firefox and it worked. Just listened to Endeavour lift off, so this is great. We didn't have telly in those days and today I still don't own one but we did have a "wireless" and as a 12 year old it was awesome to follow Apollo. Glad NASA found the

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Vincent Medina wrote: > Chapura Syncs (Business App) currently FREE. Somehow, I doubt it will work so well on my Linux box. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Vincent Medina wrote: > 3rd party app works fine... Someone reported the emulator can't hotsync. That doesn't sound "fine" to me. In fact, it sounds more like "fundamentally useless". -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: ESXi 4.0 is free... the Client isn't!?

No The client is free. Its the host you need to license. You register for the license when you download the software. You point your browser at https://esxihost and download the client from there. Greg From: Matthew W. Ross [mr...@ephrataschoo

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Chapura Syncs (Business App) currently FREE. -Original Message- From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? On 15 Jul 2009 at 14:42, Sam Cayze wrote: > Yes it can,

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

I use splashid and Where apps daily and love them... -Original Message- From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? But those are the most fun. (I'll admit I installed a fe

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

I can use Chapura to sync Outlook, works like a champ. From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? That's assuming that every Pre user is going to connect to a corporate

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Full day no problem on my pre. You have to turn off the gmail update every 5 min and set it to as it arrives and that little tweak makes a HUGE difference. Also turn off the GPS and Wifi and use as needed. The WebOS is the absolute BEST OS I have used in a smartphone since the PalmOS and the Treo.

RE: TS eval terminates early

Cute J It actually turned out to be the first ts and its license server. I actually lost two others that had valid cals on them. Once I corrected the first one all the others including the two temporary ones I posted about came back to life. Thanks dave From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich..

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

3rd party app works fine... -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Along with the physi

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

It does sync with third party apps via wifi and soon Bluetooth. The phone is the best phone I ever owned and I have owned them all.. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: P

Re: DHCP Failover

Brrr, its DRAFTy in here! ;-) But not really a NT System Admin solution. I hear Windows 2008 will be drafty as well... -- ME2 On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Eric E Eskam wrote: > > Micheal Espinola Jr wrote on 07/14/2009 02:37:02 > PM: > >> Windows Server comes with a DHCP server. In ter

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Pre, now with no iTunes synching, too. http://gizmodo.com/5315386/confirmed-itunes-821-breaks-pre-syncing On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: > On 15 Jul 2009 at 14:42, Sam Cayze wrote: > > > Yes it can, there is an emulator. > > However, the emulator HAS NO HOTSYNC so y

RE: Any WebSense Gurus?

Nope--just one domain. But each site has its own DC. -Original Message- From: Klint Price [mailto:kpr...@arizonaitpro.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Any WebSense Gurus? Do you have users on multiple domains? In my websense, for 500 u

Re: ESXi 4.0 is free... the Client isn't!?

ESXi may be freeware but you still need license codes from VMware to use it past 60 days. Matthew W. Ross wrote: > Okay, I'm trying ESXi 4.0... and it seems to work well. > > But it has me use the vSphere client... which is A) a bit slow and B) > not free! Instead, It's a 60 day evaluation... and

RE: DHCP Failover

It's been possible to install DHCP into a Windows Failover Cluster for years. Windows 2008 R2, due Real Soon Now, also provides multiple-server replication and failover. From: Eric E Eskam [ees...@usgs.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:04 PM To: NT System Adm

ESXi 4.0 is free... the Client isn't!?

Okay, I'm trying ESXi 4.0... and it seems to work well. But it has me use the vSphere client... which is A) a bit slow and B) not free! Instead, It's a 60 day evaluation... and I don't see what happens after the end of that evaluation. I suspect it stops working. So I made a quick phone call to

Re: DHCP Failover

Micheal Espinola Jr wrote on 07/14/2009 02:37:02 PM: > Windows Server comes with a DHCP server. In terms of "failover", there > is no such thing for DHCP. For Microsoft DHCP maybe, but ISC DHCP supports failover: http://www.iqware.co.uk/dhcp-3.php We use it and it works. Eric Eskam =-=-=-=-

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

On 15 Jul 2009 at 14:42, Sam Cayze wrote: > Yes it can, there is an emulator. However, the emulator HAS NO HOTSYNC so you can't sync your 'Classic' app with your desktop. Makes it useless to me. -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 +-

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

On 15 Jul 2009 at 14:07, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Great. thanks Palm. Or have I missed something very obvious? No, you didn't miss anything. Palm Pre is cloud based, not tied to your desktop. Chapura's app is required for business use. -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-

RE: Missing emails after an archive - Outlook 2003

You should direct this to the Exchange list... exchangel...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com From: Jim Majorowicz [mailto:jmajorow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Missing emails after an archive - Outlook 2003 We had tech use the Manua

Missing emails after an archive - Outlook 2003

We had tech use the Manual Archiving feature of Outlook 2003 to create a series of PSTs of an oversized mailbox in preparation of moving the contents of the mailbox to a new domain. (Two companies with SBS have merged and going to use just one server.) Unfortunately they were a little overzealous

RE: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

I can't answer that; you're on a need to know basis. Shook From: Eric E Eskam [mailto:ees...@usgs.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw "Ziots, Edward" wrote on 07/10/2009 08:37:04 AM: > ht

Re: IE zero day exploit Microsoft new for 1+ yrs of this flaw

"Ziots, Edward" wrote on 07/10/2009 08:37:04 AM: > http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135370/ > Microsoft_admits_it_knew_of_critical_IE_bug_in_early_08? > source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2009-07-10 > > You know this type of stuff really burns me up, they knew since > early 08 of this flaw, and di

RE: Instant Search In Outlook 2007 not functioning (Google Apps Sync's fault)

Wow. Lame. http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/17/google-apps-sync-disables-o utlook-search.aspx Personally I don't like MS's implementation of Instant Search, but it's so much better than not having it at all. What a stupid move on Google's part, especially since they compete in

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Well that's subjective... From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Apple vs Microsoft? Objective opinion - Original Message - From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) To: NT System A

Re: Apple vs Microsoft?

Objective opinion - Original Message - From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:58 PM Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Frozen Tundra. From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

But those are the most fun. (I'll admit I installed a few) Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:jschwa...@bbandt.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Pal

RE: Any WebSense Gurus?

Do you have users on multiple domains? In my websense, for 500 users, I have them going through a single DC. Klint -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Any WebS

Re: Remote Access policy

"Joe Heaton" wrote on 07/09/2009 12:27:06 PM: > Does anyone have a decent remote access policy they could share > with me? I?m tasked to create one, in the next couple of > weeks, and I?m not sure of verbage. I?d appreciate any help > you guys could offer on this. Check out NIST Special Publ

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Grammatical error. From: Alverson, Tom (Xetron) [mailto:tom.alver...@ngc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Frozen Tundra. From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:42 PM To:

RE: UAC--argh...

I think the only time an admin account would be used would be specifically to install software - I'm thinking kind of like changing a Citrix server to install mode where you only invoke that mode to install stuff. And hopefully the thumb drive gets scanned before a file is opened or moved from i

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Frozen Tundra. From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Apple vs Microsoft? BES server - Original Message - From: John Cook To: NT Syst

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

RPM's From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Apple vs Microsoft? BES server - Original Message - From: John Cook To: NT System Admin Issues

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

That's assuming that every Pre user is going to connect to a corporate e-mail system. If you wanted it to use it with a home e-mail from your ISP you'd be SOL. You can POP your e-mail, but you wouldn't be able to sync your tasks, calendar, and contacts. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Schwartz,

Re: Apple vs Microsoft?

BES server - Original Message - From: John Cook To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:25 PM Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Military Intelligence John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gai

RE: UAC--argh...

LOL-that happens a LOT in the school applications world with permissions in general-"it needs to be administrator". So question on disabling AAM-Wouldn't that defeat the "malware protection" component of UAC, assuming an admin account was somehow used run the malware without that admin user's k

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Good list, I agree with all those. There is a big update coming soon that addresses the Exchange items (Wipe, PINs, etc...) I hear people complain about battery life a lot, but I'm having a great experience with it. Far better than any Palm I've used before. Sam -Original Message-

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

"our SANS" (in reference to a storage area network) From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:26 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Military Intelligence John W. Cook Systems Administrator

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Military Intelligence John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednes

RE: Who deleted files

We just implemented this: http://www.varonis.com/products/datadvantage/ Can't say I love the fat client, and no web interface, but the results are impressive. Chris Bodnar, MCSE Sr. Systems Engineer Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services Guardian Life Insurance Company o

RE: Who deleted files

Be careful of what you turn on with auditing - you can really add clutter to the event logs if you just enable everything. You will also have to enable audit object access in the audit policy as well as configuring auditing on the folder(s) in question. From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert.lebl

RE: UAC--argh...

+1 on keeping UAC on. Disabling AAM is sufficient to remove the annoyances, UAC has real benefits. My opinion concurs with Ben's. Just last week I was working with a vendor who claimed their application required Vista's User Access Control (UAC) needed to be turned off for the application to wo

RE: Who deleted files

The other option is something like tripwire... From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert.lebl...@aanmpc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who deleted files Snookered is right I do not have auditing on but will turn it on. Never had this issue

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:15, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> July 20th and July 4th are the two days I observe as truly worthy >> human events. > >  What, no love for 12 April?  ;-) Well, it was a good day in 1945, but otherwise not so much. Heh. >> Best

OT: Any WebSense Gurus?

We had a vendor come in and install WebSense on a server for us. However, the vendor is stumped by a problem and I figured I'd see if any of the pros here had a solution. I'm brand new to WebSense myself, so I can't help much. The vendor has been working with WebSense tech support, but apparentl

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Yes it can, there is an emulator. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers? On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Along with th

RE: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

Wireless - To be without a physical, wired connection. ;-) A standalone install of Outlook still has to connect to some email system so you can just sync with that just like any other client. Bad things No PIN enforcement. No remote wipe. Breaks formatting of emails on a reply message. No option

RE: Spare touch screen

One of our developers wrote the code. Took less than a week with .Net. It really is quite nice. With the touchscreen, a prox card reader, a label printer, and our VOIP system any employee can scan their badge to create guest badges as well as guests being able to use a corporate directory to fin

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Along with the physical build quality issues I have been reading > about, I just found out some interesting details about the Pre:  As a > previous Palm user of various models over the years, I was really > surprised to find out that it

Re: UAC--argh...

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Miller Bonnie L. wrote: > So, I’ve been trying REALLY hard to just get used to UAC with WS08 ... The following is my opinion and analysis. It differs significantly from the Microsoft party line. Disable admin approval mode (AAM) for all administrators.Ke

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

I'm only speaking in terms of synchronizing data - which has always been a primary feature of Palm devices. If Im missing something, please do tell. -- ME2 On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Sam Cayze wrote: > You've missed a lot. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [m

Instant Search In Outlook 2007 not functioning

Vista Biz 32bit SP2, Outlook 2007 SP2. A month or so ago I noticed all the Instant Search fields were greyed out in Outlook. It's there, but you can't type in any of the fields like From, Body, Subject, etc. I've tried rebuilding the index in Vista, searched everywhere in Outlook looking for a

Re: Palm Pre: The phone for suckers?

So, you don't feel trancendant as if you were doing Yoga in a see of red clothed people moving in rhythm to your actions? On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Sam Cayze wrote: > You've missed a lot. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] >

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

This page left intentionally blank -sc From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? US Senate Ethics Committee... From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy

Re: [OT] We Choose The Moon

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > July 20th and July 4th are the two days I observe as truly worthy > human events. What, no love for 12 April? ;-) > Best news of the week: NASA has found the lost tapes of the landing > and walk, and will be restoring them. I had read that

RE: Keeping us employed (link)

Where's Dean when I need him? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) Yes they are, I've had them for three or four seasons... Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [m

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

US Senate Ethics Committee... From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? Original copy. Shook From: Gary Whitten [mailto:li...@undiscoveredworlds.

RE: UAC--argh...

I notice that when doing a runas to get explorer with elevated privileges, operations such as file copies, new folder, folder/file renames, are not immediately visible until refreshing. Also, which should probably be expected, if an explorer window is open as an elevated account, and another is no

RE: Terminal Services Profiles

I think I may of explained my problem incorrectly, now that I look at what I wrote. I have the GPO set to create a TS roaming user profile in \\server\profiles$ Everyone, and authenticated users have access to that share, and the changes propogate to child objects. The permissions appear to b

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

Original copy. Shook From: Gary Whitten [mailto:li...@undiscoveredworlds.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Apple vs Microsoft? PIN number From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15,

RE: Keeping us employed (link)

Yes they are, I've had them for three or four seasons... Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping us employed (link) This is not the Day 0 you are looking for. Move along... -sc From: Zi

RE: Apple vs Microsoft?

+1 here too. As a consultant on the side I have to play both sides as well, it keeps me sharp on the desktop side (well, maybe less dull is more accurate...). It also helps me a lot when it comes to %DAYJOB% when talking to our desktop guys since I can relate to their side of the situation. Besi

RE: UAC--argh...

Yes, prompting disabled is automatic approval of the dimmed-background UAC prompts. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: UAC--argh... The only difference I can see is that I used windows

Re: Apple vs Microsoft?

That's the best description of my predecessor in my current position. At my previous netadmin job I worked for a high school and I was it for ~600 computers and ~1600 users, of which at any one time there were about 250 computers in use. In order to maintain uptime and availability, I had to thin

  1   2   3   >