I used Firebug in Firefox to see what was happening. I went back and
looked at my add-ons in Firefox. I did not see anything that would block
advertising. It probably was not Websense because it would have returned
quickly with a blocked page response. Maybe it could have been a
firewall rule. I
You can just fail the resources over to node 2. As long as nodes 3 4 can
communicate with node 2, then node 2 remains the owner.
The problem you have is if comms is cut between Site1 and Site2. Then you have
two nodes at each end - which side should pick a node to seize control of the
Also +1 to Brian's comments. Do you really need a stretched cluster? Mirroring
can provide auto-failover at the SQL Server level.
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Monday, 11 April 2011 9:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
With the huge sizes hard drives can reach, is RAID5 still better than, say,
mirrored drives? Or some other way. Our consultants want RAID5 for every
server...
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 6:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
In my opinion Raid 5 on Everything is just wrong. You have to use the
appropriate Raid Level for you specific needs. I had a consultant several
years ago that said Raid 5 was the absolute best for their application. As a
matter of fact they said it was best in all occasions. I then setup
I created a unicast Windows Network Load Balance between two 2008 R2 servers.
Two of the NICs are on the same LAN subnet as our domain and the other two are
connected together via crossover cable on a 10.x.x.x subnet for heartbeat.
Everything seems fine except when I reboot one of the
RAID1 you lose 50% of disk space
RAID5 you lose 1/n (n = number of drives) of disk space. (33% for 3 drives, 25%
for 4 drives, 10% for 10 drives, 5% for 20 drives etc.)
The larger the number of spindles in your RAID5 array, the less space you lose.
RAID1 performs better though. Both arrays can
On 4/11/2011 9:22 AM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
Also +1 to Brian's comments. Do you really need a stretched cluster?
Mirroring can provide auto-failover at the SQL Server level.
He tells me we will have asynchronous mirroring between the sites. (it's
SAN replication, between HP SANs .. or will be,
This shouldn't be a cross-over cable. It's not just for heartbeat at all. This
should be a second port on a standard server VLAN.
You can do Unicast NLB on Windows 2008 R2 with a single NIC, also.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Leedy,
SQL Server Mirroring has an asych mode too:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc917680.aspx
Also, SQL Server Mirror can be brought online automatically.
SAN sync to a geo stretched cluster will probably be very expensive. Usually
SAN sync is to an offline DB, with the cluster at the
Single NIC... that's sound simpler. I tried rebuilding the NLB with a single
NIC, but now I get this warning...
Running NLB Manager on a system with all networks bound to NLB might not work
as expected. If all interfaces are set to run NLB in unicast mode, NLB will
fail to connect to hosts.
Actually, I checked and both NICs are plugged into the same VLAN. I thought
they were on a crossover cable, but I was thinking about a cluster I'm also
working on.
Any ways, the issue is the same. The NLB NIC still says Unidentified network
and when I reboot the server, the primary NIC fails
Theoretically, you could lose half your drives without failure with RAID1...but
they need to be the right half.
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinion on rebuilding Raid 5
RAID1 you lose 50% of disk
You should be able to do that with Batch and Print Pro
http://www.traction-software.co.uk/batchprint/
-Original Message-
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hot folder for text files?
Dumb
I have a question about Raid 10 vs Raid 0+1...
I understand the fundamental differences between the two: One is a raid 1 of
two raid 0s, and the other is a raid 0 of two raid 1s...
Obviously, the raid 10 allows any two disks to die, which I see as an
advantage. Is there some kind of speed
I wrote a script that emails a new file that appears in a folder, I'm sure
we could tweak it to print the file instead.
Back in the office Tuesday. Ping me if interested.
Sam
On Apr 11, 2011 12:30 PM, Evan Brastow ebras...@automatedemblem.com
wrote:
Dumb question, but I'm striking out on
Do the text files that have already been printed remain in the directory or are
they deleted?
--
Bob Hartung
Wisco Industries, Inc.
736 Janesville St.
Oregon, WI 53575
Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
_
From: Evan Brastow
I've honestly never seen any in-depth comparisons on the performance
differences between RAID 0+1 and RAID 10. This article provides a clear
explanation on the fault tolerant differences between the two (RAID 10
allowing for a greater combination of drive failures).
Good send.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Test
Did I get
I find it is just easier to use the 1 nic on each server. Simpler is better.
It works well.
-BenN
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Leedy, Andy ale...@butlerschein.comwrote:
Actually, I checked and both NICs are plugged into the same VLAN. I thought
they were on a crossover cable, but I was
first
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com wrote:
Did I get unsubbed? No emails for two days!
BF
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions
Test failed - please reenter your 25 character key and try again!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Apr 11 16:23:01 2011
May be OT but I am interested in this as well. Thank you for asking.
Jon
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
Now since Comcast has been digital, the old analog tuner card in my 5+
year old XP Media Center pc won’t tune in even the ‘free’ cable channels.
Yeah you can ignore the warning. I'm not sure why it still has that message.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Either can be done easily... trivial.
I usually move mine to a subfolder called 'processed'.
Sam
On Apr 11, 2011 1:17 PM, Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com wrote:
Do the text files that have already been printed remain in the directory
or are they deleted?
--
Bob Hartung
I have the $12 basic cable package, and my ancient tuner card works fine
still (last time I checked)
Is that the cable package you are curious about... I can check what card I
have later if interested.
Sam
On Apr 11, 2011 7:33 AM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
Now since Comcast has
Would you settle for my Credit Card number? Seems it became public the other
day anyway. I did a lot of shopping in Pennsylvania while I was at 36,000 feet
and nowhere near PA.
By sending my test email, I am now receiving emails from the list. I guess
Lyris didn’t like me for some reason.
There are several USB options available that say they work with Digital Cable.
I do not have Comcast and have not tried any of them, but I am getting ready to
purchase one for the Digital Cable in my area.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April
I don't have ComCast, but in regards to a tuner card I can recommend this:
Hauppauge 1229 WinTV-HVR-2250
Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP
Technical Support III
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone:
Yes, yes we are :)
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 9:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deleting messages older than 60 days
Retention policies will do what you want. However, frankly, I wouldn't do it
for
What cost level you looking at sub $100 or more than $100.
Sam's Club had some WD pocket 1TB drives for about $119 USB 2 with case. I
saw the larger WD 1TB for just under $100. The $500 GB ones were about
$90. You could put one together for about $90 purchasing either Seagate or
WD drives and
Thanks … my ancient tuner card quit working when they converted to all
digital signals … not even my ‘cable ready’ TVs from only 5 or 6 years ago
will tune in any cable stations now. Had to get digital cable boxes (
besides the main cable box) to use with other TVs , like in the bedroom,
too.
Thanks, that could be a good option. I’ve heard horror stories about
‘cablecard’ and google searches turn up a lot of older hits with complaints.
Guessing they have the bugs worked out now ?
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a
thanks
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 5:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Media Center tuner
I use a 1TB SATA Seagate at home.. Hard drive and case was around $80.
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: USB hard drives
Anyone got a suggestion for a good, but inexpensive external hard
If this doesn’t need to be ultraportable ( ie, leaving the office frequently
for field use, laptop, etc ) then I agree with you, a full size external
USB cabinet can be had for around $30 from MicroCenter or Fry’s , and a
500GB 7200 rpm 3.5” drive is down to the $50-$60 range, 1TB also barely
I did something similar before, monitored a folder and if a file was older
than 5 minutes it sent an email. Had to add in a timer loop to only send 1
mail an hour as the recipient got fed up getting the alerts :-)
Think I set it as a scheduled task to run at startup so it was always
running.
T
It also depends on what you use it for. For reading the performance
difference is not as dramatic as for writing, especially as you add more
disks. For writing the difference will improve with more disks, but will
still be less than half of raid1.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Ken Schaefer
On 10 Apr 2011 at 9:51, Paul Hutchings wrote:
We have the infrastructure to do it in-house and most of these folks
spend considerable
time at their desks so there´s little point pumping data out of the
organisation to the
cloud. Putting any rational security arguments aside
The Ceton solution is currently the only solution for CableCARD so that's where
you're going. They have PCI and external options.
If you just want OTA unencrypted, an HDHomeRun is what I have/recommend. That
device can interop with all sorts of stuff (e.g. VLC Player) over the LAN too.
Thanks,
Go on NewEgg and pick? That's how I've always made decisions about this caliber
hardware.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
If for informal use, probably the cheapest will work. Fry's consistently
has 500+ G for well under $100. If something more serious, I like Seagate's
line for not much more.
** sent slowly via DroidX **
On Apr 11, 2011 1:58 PM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
wrote:
Anyone got a
Today, Fry's was advertising a 2TB Hitachi drive for $69.
** sent slowly via DroidX **
On Apr 11, 2011 3:09 PM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
If this doesn’t need to be ultraportable ( ie, leaving the office
frequently
for field use, laptop, etc ) then I agree with you, a full size
Speaking of which, what's up with A_M? I haven't see anything since Friday,
and that makes me a sad panda.
--
ME2
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com wrote:
Did I get unsubbed? No emails for two days!
BF
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
Go on NewEgg and pick? That's how I've always made decisions about this caliber
hardware.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
The Ceton solution is currently the only solution for CableCARD so that's where
you're going. They have PCI and external options.
If you just want OTA unencrypted, an HDHomeRun is what I have/recommend. That
device can interop with all sorts of stuff (e.g. VLC Player) over the LAN too.
Thanks,
The technology works. Unfortunately your cable vendor is unlikely to know WTF
is going on. Make sure you tell them it's for a TIVO. They've *never* heard of
an MCE. The TIVO generates sufficient truck rolls that they'll know what to do.
If you have a Ceton card you need to make sure the phone
47 matches
Mail list logo
