RE: Powershell and dos batch

You can pass session level execution policy by adding a -ExecutionPolicy argument to your powershell.exe call. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:49 AM To:

RE: Powershell and dos batch

I agree with that entirely. I know nothing of powershell but require a dos batch backup of the server. So I learn bits from you all. And thank you again. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:50 PM Posted To: itli

Re: More fallout from Flame

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > And, IMHO, more evidence that application whitelisting is really required... > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/06/internet-security-fail/ So long as you're not using Microsoft's code signing infrastructure as part of your whitelisting sol

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

Can I just say that they are idiots? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, David Lum wrote: > We fired off an advisory e-mail to our staff about LinkedIn and > recommending they change their password, and included links to both the > LinkedIn Tweet and the CNet article. After the e-mail went out I go

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

Agreed. But was that a marble mantel, or a wood mantel? :) Kurt On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Kat Aylward Langan wrote: > Our IT department declined to notify, but I went to our WebMarketing team > and they took up the mantel, with the idea that our company is in the > business of networks an

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

All 4 offices are independently ran and do not share any files. It's a dental office so its not too complex. Although central administration would be nice, I don't think that is in the road map. However, if the owner decides to centralize management, I think going the route of Server 2008 would

RE: Powershell and dos batch

That’s what I was afraid of. I hope that Exchange won’t require a new version or SP to support 3.0 as I’d hate to have my management tools broken. DAMIEN SOLODOW Systems Engineer 317.447.6033 (office) 317.447.6014 (fax) HARRISON COLLEGE From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent:

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Pretty much everything will require updates. From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch Who reads those? ;) And yeah, I did read through the ones for the most recent 3.0 RC. I di

RE: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

+100 On Jun 6, 2012 7:29 PM, "Rod Trent" wrote: > > You did the right thing. The other folks are idiots. > > > > From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:07 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn) > > > > We fired off

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Who reads those? ;) And yeah, I did read through the ones for the most recent 3.0 RC. I did like the number of “this will now throw an error because it should have before” On a related note, any idea how existing modules like Exchange 2010 and the MS AD module will work with 3.0? I’ll wager the

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

Our IT department declined to notify, but I went to our WebMarketing team and they took up the mantel, with the idea that our company is in the business of networks and security so a message from the company to the world seemed appropriate, copying our internal folks for good measure... On Wed, Ju

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

Yes,i did to two orgs I support. Due diligence, seems to me. On Jun 6, 2012 2:59 PM, "David Lum" wrote: > We fired off an advisory e-mail to our staff about LinkedIn and > recommending they change their password, and included links to both the > LinkedIn Tweet and the CNet article. After the e-m

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

There are many cases where SBS makes sense, including when handled by clueful IT professionals. It's a very good product and when used and administered the way it was designed to be there is no issue. Problems arise when clueful IT professionals who know AD, Exchange etc. (but not SBS) try and us

RE: Powershell and dos batch

OH NO THEY AREN’T fully backward compatible. Read your release notes. From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch I blame MBS. ;) I think it’s because the newer versions are ful

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

How many offices are there? If there are many then integration makes even more sense. Just because the network is connected doesn't mean they can't appear to run independent. There are benefits to central administration/management. James. -Original Message- From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:jt.

RE: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

You did the right thing. The other folks are idiots. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn) We fired off an advisory e-mail to our staff about LinkedIn and recommending they

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Language Engine version and Windows Powershell version are two different things. Its all Language Engine version "1" for all three Windows Powershell versions. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:49 PM To: NT System

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:07 PM, David Lum wrote: > We fired off an advisory e-mail to our staff about LinkedIn and recommending > they change their password, and included links to both the LinkedIn Tweet > and the CNet article. After the e-mail went out I got bombed by our Service > Desk guys (it

Re: To notify, or not notify (LinkedIn)

I did, it went without a reply which means they probably ignored it like most other warnings I send out. John W. Cook Network Operations Manager Partnership for Strong Families From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 05:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

Re: Disc Burning Issues

Just rename it then. ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:49:43 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: Disc Burning Issues True, but that also deletes everything in "My " where = documents, music, etc.

Re: OT: RIP Ray

Which book would you like to be? Kurt On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Christopher Bodnar wrote: > > > http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/06/ray-bradbury-dead-at-91-taught-generations-of-readers-how-to-dream.html > > > > > Christopher Bodnar > Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

On 6 Jun 2012 at 14:05, NT System Admin Issues wrote: > On 6 Jun 2012 at 18:28, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote: > > > What I had heard from my security guy was that what was hacked > > was the hash for the encryption. So, doesn't really matter what > > you change to until Linkedin changes the hash

RE: Powershell and dos batch

PowerShell was designed to address 3 major classes of people: Admins, Admin scripters, Developers. There is feature content for each group and a fairly decent glide path between the groups. Truth be told though, if you don't have mastery of "basic admin" use of PowerShell before you try to bec

RE: Powershell and dos batch

It is SUPPOSED to indicate compatibility between the versions. Which, for everything but the simplest of scripts, is beginning to be something of a joke, especially with PS 3.0. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:49 PM To: NT System Admi

RE: Powershell and dos batch

I blame MBS. ;) I think it’s because the newer versions are fully backward compatible so there is no reason for parallel installs. So by putting it in the same directory scripts and the like invoking powershell aren’t broken by new versions. DAMIEN SOLODOW Systems Engineer 317.447.6033 (office)

Re: Is there a way...

On 24 May 2012 at 21:08, David Lum wrote: > In batch to take this output: > --- > W32i DLL ENU 11.2.202.235 shp flash32_11_2_202_235.ocx > Reply from 4.2.2.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53 > --- > And end up with this in a .TXT file? > --- > 11.2.202.235 , 24ms > -

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

On 6 Jun 2012 at 18:28, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote: > What I had heard from my security guy was that what was hacked > was the hash for the encryption. So, doesn't really matter what > you change to until Linkedin changes the hash itself. Anyone hear > if they've done that? Actually, it seems t

RE: Powershell and dos batch

I recommend, quite strongly, that you buy yourself a book. A beginner's book such as "PowerShell In A Month of Lunches". In Win8/Server 2012 everything is PowerShell. The GUI's have far few capabilities than the command line, and you can be certain that that is the future. If you haven't learn

RE: RIP Ray

Oh no! Ray's version of Mars influenced me throughout my life. From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: RIP Ray http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/06/ray-bradbury-dead-at-91-taught-gene

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Guilty as charged :-) Even at that it only failed because I tried to do an SBS-y thing after treating it non-SBS-y for years. I think the real takeaway is either treat it "native" -OR- SBS-like but don't mix and match. SBS2011 makes the "non-SBSy" stuff kludgy so you REALLY don't want to mix

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Art DeKneef wrote: > Yes the "wizards" are an issue with a lot of people but think of it as a way > to configure the server consistently. Is it that much different from someone > that runs a batch of scripts setting up a server? Couldn't running those > scripts be c

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

If they are going to be at 20 users but no more than 25 for a few years then SBSe (Essentials) might be fine for you. It requires no CALs for the users and if you need a second server for SQL/Sharepoint then you add the Premium Add-On along with Cals for SBS Premium (only for those using the SQL

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Ah, did not know that! I wonder who thought up that gem? =) From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Powershell and dos batch Actually all current powershell versions (including the forthcoming 3.0)

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

You haven't seen SBS2011's wizards, they really make your life easier, not harder. Well, once you get over that for most SMB's there's no need to get overly complicated anyway. :-) Or if you use an SBS products and DON'T use the wizards, be prepared for unexpected things to break. It's similar

OT: RIP Ray

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/06/ray-bradbury-dead-at-91-taught-generations-of-readers-how-to-dream.html Christopher Bodnar Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise Architecture and Engineering Services Tel 610-807-6459 3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem,

RE: Disc Burning Issues

Depends how you use that axe. Backup is recommended, of course. :-) Daniel On Jun 6, 2012 3:47 PM, "Daniel Chenault" wrote: > True, but that also deletes everything in “My ” where = > documents, music, etc. > > ** ** > > An axe will certainly take care of a boil on one’s pinky but it’s a

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Did you take a look at any of the documentation on the Symantec site? According to this it requires PowerShell 2.0: http://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/preparing-your-powershell-environment-run-bemcli-and-scripts Christopher Bodnar Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:

Re: Powershell and dos batch

Add -confirm:0 as a parameter to start-bejob --Original Message-- From: itli...@imcu.com To: NT System Admin Issues ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch Sent: Jun 6, 2012 2:53 PM How do I push the confirm to Y?       From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

SharePoint comes in two versions, free, SharePoint Foundation Server, and paid, SharePoint Server. SharePoint Foundation most likely will handle all their needs. For server 2008 R2 you have to configure SharePoint from scratch, while with SBS, SharePoint is setup for you with the basics as part

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Working under v1.0. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:48 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch Do they require Powershell v2? I see you are using v1.0.

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Kennedy, Jim wrote: > Something to keep in mind here. Linkedin is still investigating. So that > means they have not found the problem……so the exploit that was used to get > the passwords before everyone changed them is still usable. Only now lots > more people know

RE: Powershell and dos batch

How did you determine that? From: Miller Bonnie L. [mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch Do they require Powershell v2? I see you are using v1.0. ~ Finally, powerful

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote: > What I had heard from my security guy was that what was hacked was the hash > for the encryption.  So, doesn’t really matter what you change to until > Linkedin changes the hash itself.  Anyone hear if they’ve done that? I believe your

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Ben, I will have to disagree with you on this. In my experience I haven't had many issues with the different SBSs compared to regular Windows Server. Each has its place and I agree it will depend on the individual client's needs. Yes the "wizards" are an issue with a lot of people but think of it

Re: Powershell and dos batch

Actually all current powershell versions (including the forthcoming 3.0) install in that path. -- Sent using BlackBerry From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 02:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

It sounds like I should stay away from wizards...that way they have to keep me :) The will never integrate the networks because each office is independent of each other, under different business names as well. There is no need to integrate them. I guess I'll just test out the features and see how

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Ok Thanks to all. Here is what I have. Dos Batch File executed by a Scheduler software. :Powershell C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\V1.0\PowerShell.exe -file c:\windows\system32\windowspowershell\v1.0\Backupjob.ps1 Exit A powershell script. BackupJob: Import-module bemcli Get-BEJ

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

In addition to Andrew's questions. How many offices are there? Do they need resources from the main office? How is email handled? As for what else you get with SBS, maybe you should spend a little time here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/Windows-Small-Business-Server/ed itions

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

More on this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4073309 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > http://mashable.com/2012/06/06/6-5-million-linkedin-passwords/ > > Even though this report has not yet been validated (at the time of my > posting), I would highly recommend that yo

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Um, that's not the way it works... If they have the hash, they can reverse it with enough effort (read: rainbow tables or brute force). However, if you change your password, the has changes. In fact, for some cipher systems, one of the design goals that a change of one character in the encrypted

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Getting there. Just need to figure the confirm issue the Start-BEJob and I am set. From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:26 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch If you

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Now it is. Just need to get past this Confirm piece of Start-BEJob and I will be cooking in grease I think. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:24 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: P

RE: Powershell and dos batch

How do I push the confirm to Y? From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:06 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch Ah. Change your .ps1 file; Import-module bem

RE: Disc Burning Issues

True, but that also deletes everything in "My " where = documents, music, etc. An axe will certainly take care of a boil on one's pinky but it's a bit overkill. Daniel Chenault dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160] From: Rankin, James R [ma

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Do they require Powershell v2? I see you are using v1.0. From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch I did what you said. Here is my error so far. The term 'GET-BEJob' is not recognized

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jimmy Tran wrote: > They will have no more than 20 per office and each office will > be setup independent of each other. Either that won't last, or the company won't. So I'd try to get them to plan for eventual integration of the various office networks. Which a

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Each will have their own domain. Is sharepoint an additional license for server 2008 and SBS? From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2 Independent as in their own do

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jimmy Tran wrote: > I’m getting ready to purchase a few licenses for a client.  The main > difference I see between the two OS’s is SBS includes Exchange.  The down > side is SBS requires much more resources as seen from my lab.  If there are > no plans for on prem

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Who is doing day to day-ish administration? SBS2011 is wizard-driven (you can do things the 2008R2 way if you want but trust me, you don't want). The backups are similar, but not identical. SBS2011 wants a dedicated volume for backups (it hides the backup volume form Explorer, for example). Do

RE: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

What I had heard from my security guy was that what was hacked was the hash for the encryption. So, doesn't really matter what you change to until Linkedin changes the hash itself. Anyone hear if they've done that? Joe Heaton ITB - Windows Server Support From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Perhaps LinkedIn is being a little more diligent right now. Of course, it really depends on how the passwords were obtained in the first place. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:51 PM, David Lum w

Re: Anyone going to Tech Ed?

I may show up if I can tear myself away from the poolside. (yes I'm going) On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Crawford, Scott wrote: > I’ll be there and wouldn’t mind putting some faces to names. > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Killing me man. Killing me. I open a dos window I change directory to the powershell directory I execute powershell -file "myfile.ps1" I get nothing. Top it off I am trying to execute some BackupExec powershell commands in myfile.ps1 and I am not sure they want to play nice either. Really ju

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Lovely. Thank you for the notification. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > http://mashable.com/2012/06/06/6-5-million-linkedin-passwords/ > > Even though this report has not yet been validated (at the time of my > posting), I would highly recommend that you change your Link

Re: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Yes, we will have to keep our eye on this until a resolution has been publicized. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Kennedy, Jim wrote: > Something to keep in mind here. Linkedin is still i

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Well, I will say was it mentioned? We can speculate all the live long day as to what he might need... Some people enjoy doing that. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Don Kuhlman wrote: > What about the Sharepoint stuff? > > -- > *From:* Jonathan Link > *To:* NT Sys

Re: Powershell and dos batch

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, itli...@imcu.com wrote: > Really struggling with this. Perhaps buy a book on PowerShell. > It should be so simple. IT is rarely as simple as it "should" be. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Hmm...good point. However they would have to re-break in to get the changed passwords wouldn't they? Of course if they got in once it might be trivial for another go. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subje

Re: Powershell and dos batch

Who says it isn't simple? (And why do you think it should be more simple than it already is?) * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, itli...@imcu.com wrote: > Really struggling with this. It s

RE: Powershell and dos batch

I did what you said. Here is my error so far. The term 'GET-BEJob' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, scri t file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was ncluded, verify that the path is correct and try again. At C:\WINDOWS\system32\WindowsPower

RE: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

Server will just be for the usual DC, DNS, DHCP, file sharing and WSUS. They will have no more than 20 per office and each office will be setup independent of each other. What other bells and whistles you get with SBS? The user doesn't want to invest in additional money for a backup solution s

RE: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Something to keep in mind here. Linkedin is still investigating. So that means they have not found the problem..so the exploit that was used to get the passwords before everyone changed them is still usable. Only now lots more people know about it. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Really struggling with this. It should be so simple. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:49 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch >From a DOS shell, type `

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

What about the Sharepoint stuff? From: Jonathan Link To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 12:04 PM Subject: Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2 If you don't need SBS, don't buy SBS.  Last time I priced SBS, it was more expensive tha

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Did you run the set-executionpolicy like I mentioned? If so, what is the exact error you are receiving when running the batch? From: itli...@imcu.com [itli...@imcu.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Powershell and dos

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

SBS is great if you want/need Exchange and all the other "toys" you get with SBS. If you just need Windows plain jane, then buy Server 2008 R2 (or wait a month and get 2012). On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > If you don't need SBS, don't buy SBS. Last time I priced SBS, it

Re: SBS Standard 2011 or Server 2008 R2

If you don't need SBS, don't buy SBS. Last time I priced SBS, it was more expensive than just Windows Server. So, buying Windows Server, assuming it meets all your needs seems like it would be the automatic choice. Unless I'm missing something here. ??? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jimmy T

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Not helping... From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:49 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch >From a DOS shell, type `powershell.exe -?` and you'll see how to i

RE: Powershell and dos batch

>From a DOS shell, type `powershell.exe -?` and you'll see how to invoke a >session with a script and all the other options which may need to apply. jlc From: itli...@imcu.com [itli...@imcu.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Su

RE: Powershell and dos batch

Ok better. Now I get a bunch of red letter complaining about being digitally signed? From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] Posted At: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:22 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com Conversation: Powershell and dos batch Subject: RE: Powershell and dos batch

RE: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT]

Done. Thank you sir! From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: 6.5 Million Encrypted LinkedIn Passwords Leaked Online [REPORT] http://mashable.com/2012/06/06/6-5-million-linkedin-passwords/ Even though this report

Re: Disc Burning Issues

Yes, but next step should be to see if the problem follows the user elsewhere. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Rankin, James R wrote: > ** > Didn't OP already say other users could burn di

Re: Disc Burning Issues

Didn't OP already say other users could burn discs without issue? ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: "Andrew S. Baker" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:52:09 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: Disc Burning Issues Why start there? See if other use

Re: Disc Burning Issues

Why start there? See if other users on the same machine have problems, and if the same user has problems on similarly configured machines. Then we can move to blowing away the profile... * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… *

Re: Need some help with a Beta Test

How did this go, I thoguht the training was very good, but have received no feedback on whetther I was one of the first 30 or not. Graeme On 1 June 2012 15:38, Stu Sjouwerman wrote: > HI All, > > ** ** > > Know anyone that can jump on this and help out? Please forward to anyone > you kno