RE: LDAP authentication across external trust

Domain B DC can send a referral to the client telling the client to go to a Domain A DC (it requires that the external reference object exist in the directory, but it should be there) – that’s how LDAP works. Domain B DC will not “proxy” the authentication request (unlike NTLM) to the Domain A D

Re: Deploying Printers in Group Policy not working for non-admins

Permissions for installing printer drivers? http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-hardware/install-network-printers-without-local-admin/b21aa72b-5a7f-485d-999e-f844e7d4a550 On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Matthew W. Ross wrote: > Good Afternoon. > > I'm deploying printers

Re: Deploying Printers in Group Policy not working for non-admins

I always deploy printers to users via Users --> GPO Preferences. I never tried your method, but user assignments work well here. >>> "Matthew W. Ross" 8/30/2012 6:01 PM >>> Good Afternoon. I'm deploying printers using Group Policy. We have Windows Server 20008 R2 Domain controllers and Win

Deploying Printers in Group Policy not working for non-admins

Good Afternoon. I'm deploying printers using Group Policy. We have Windows Server 20008 R2 Domain controllers and Windows 7 desktops. I have a new lab that I wanted to deploy the network printers. In this one lab, for some reason, Administrators see the printers. Non-admins do not. I am using

Re: 0 Day in Java 1.7 up to Version 6

Yes, it is patched against the specific exploit vectors that have currently been discussed. It is unclear whether or not other as-yet-too-difficult-to-pursue avenues have been also addressed by this patch. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the

RE: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug

Look in %temp% -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug I have a roaming profile and am unable to find the files referenced at t

RE: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug

I have a roaming profile and am unable to find the files referenced at that site, grr -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security

Re: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug

Thanks Dave and Z * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:47 PM, David Lum wrote: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/08/30/oracle-quietly-releases-fix-for-serious-java-security-bug-mont

RE: Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug

For those doing the silent installs I just tested this one and the silent install works fine. MSIEXEC /I "jre1.7.0_07-c.msi" /qn /norestart /log "setup.log" You can extract the .msi using the instructions from the following site: http://www.scriptingsimon.com/2010/10/installing-java-silently/ Z

Oracle Quietly Releases Fix For Serious Java Security Bug

http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/08/30/oracle-quietly-releases-fix-for-serious-java-security-bug-months-after-it-was-reported/ Dave -Original Message- From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subjec

RE: 0 Day in Java 1.7 up to Version 6

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2012-4681-18 35715.html?printOnly=1 Oracle Security Alert for CVE-2012-4681 Description This Security Alert addresses security issues CVE-2012-4681 (US-CERT Alert TA12-240A) and two other vulnerabilities affecting Java running in web br

Re: 0 Day in Java 1.7 up to Version 6

according to cert: http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/636312 "This issue is addressed in Java 7 Update 7. Also consider the following workarounds:" so I guess the real question is, is it really patched? - "Choose the highest bidder" was my answer when they told me I was up for sale

RE: 0 Day in Java 1.7 up to Version 6

"After an exploit for them has been added to the Blackhole exploit kit, the number of sites functioning as entrance points for malware has risen exponentially. According to Patrik Runald, director of security research at Websense, the company has already spotted over 100 unique domains serving t

Re: Ultrabook

Wow - that would make me think about going MB vs pure Win... Nice on the book in the iBookstore... From: Webster To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:51 AM Subject: Re: Ultrabook I get a 20% discount on them but I can only buy 2

Re: Ultrabook

Sounds like another one would be a good one for the labs and vms, as well as providing you a backup :) Don K From: Webster To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:10 AM Subject: Re: Ultrabook My current MBPro is what I use for my wo

Re: Ultrabook

too heavy if you are going to buy a heavy laptop, get... SYSTEM OPTIONS Processor Intel® Core™ i7-2760QM (Quad Core 2.40GHz, 6M cache, Upgradable to Intel® vPro™ technology) edit Operating System Windows 7 Professional, No Media, 64-bit, English edit System Recovery None edit Energy Star/

Re: Ultrabook

And it is also not available until December. WIn8 grows on you. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Richard Stovall mailto:rich...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.co

Re: LDAP authentication across external trust

Most LDAP client applications won't chase referrals... and at any rate, the server in Domain B would need some sort of credential privileged enough to search Domain A. --Steve On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Christopher Bodnar < christopher_bod...@glic.com> wrote: > Yes Ken you have summed it u

RE: Ultrabook

Sony Z2? Doesn't meet your 16GB of RAM requirement, but weighs 1.1kgs (lighter than some ultrabooks), has a full i7 CPU, and 1080p screen (13"), 512GB SSD, USB3, plus the extras (blu-ray, backlit keyboard, finger print reader, GB ethernet etc.) Cheers Ken From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebs

Re: malicious sites/URLs

Thank you very much. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: , Edward mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org>> Subject: RE: malicious sites/URLs Here are the ones I use to do my malware research and testing. 1) www.m

RE: malicious sites/URLs

Load Spybot Search and Destroy on a system and then open Hosts file on the system. That should give you plenty of malicious sites. From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 7:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: malicious sites/URLs Greetings from New J

Re: Ultrabook

6.8lbs does not an Ultrabook make! I have a 17" monster like that but it kills my back lugging that thing across the airports. My new MBPro w/Retina has 16GB RAM and a 768GB SSD and weighs a lot less than my old 17" MBPro or my 17" backbreaker laptop. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Tech

Re: Ultrabook

How about this? http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Notebook-i7-2860QM-generation-processor/dp/B005OUKTM0 Christopher Bodnar Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise Architecture and Engineering Services Tel 610-807-6459 3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017 christopher_

RE: LDAP authentication across external trust

Yes Ken you have summed it up correctly. Never had to do something like this before, but find it odd that this is no work around to get the Domain B DC to hand off the authentication to the Domain A DC for the client. I've got a call with Microsoft today to discuss this. I think you are right,

RE: malicious sites/URLs

Here are the ones I use to do my malware research and testing. 1) www.malwaredomains.com (Start here) 2) https://spyeyetracker.abuse.ch 3) https://zeustracker.abuse.ch 4) h

Re: malicious sites/URLs

As I remember someone maintains a hosts file somewhere with a huge list of malicious domains in it that are redirected to 127.0.0.1, that might help you out a bit ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: Webster Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:23:35 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT