RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

What types of trusts do you have setup, and at what levels? From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 6:14 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers They were joined to Fore

Re: IE fix available now...

Thanks, Rod! * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Rod Trent wrote: > > http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/09/19/internet-explorer-exploited-vulnerability-fix-is-available-now/ > > > *

IE fix available now...

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/09/19/internet-explorer-exploited-vuln erability-fix-is-available-now/ Rod Trent Description: myITSMButton Description: TwitterBu

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

Passed along. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers Currently yes. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.co

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

I'm not a storage guy, although I have played one on TV once or twice. (I know how to calculate necessary IOPS for complex Exchange deployments, but that doesn't mean I know the best way to provision that using the various different SAN solutions available.) I do know some folks on the various t

RE: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

It's a very good solution. I've got it deployed with several different clients and it gets positive reviews all 'way round. -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 5:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: System C

RE: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

Awesome solution, particularly if you're also using ConfigMgr 2012. Yeah...Microsoft has never been one to name anything properly. -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 5:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

Re: vSentry

So I shared your e-mail with some of my co-workers, and here are some the responses I got... "Thanks bromium" "Come at me bromium!" "I sense an oncoming bromancium" "Have you seen Bromancing the Stone?" It's nice to know I work with such professionals. :) - Sean On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:4

RE: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

We're using it. Integrated with SCCM and is very easy to deploy. Seems to be doing a great job, as far as that goes. Interface is much better than in SCCM 2007. Joe Heaton ITB - Enterprise Server Support -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

That's really interesting Michael. Thanks for sharing. Although David's environment is different than ours, it's an interesting way of doing things in a mixed environment. Ours are joined to the domain and we do have mixed CIFS/NFS. Permissions can get kinky at times, but once you realize th

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

Currently yes. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 1:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers Is it bidirectional? From: David Lum [mailto:david@n

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

Is it bidirectional? From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers They were joined to Forest 1 DomainB. The error is when tryin

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

I am the middle man here, I don't understand what MBS is forwarding to me. From: Mathew Shember [mailto:mathew.shem...@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB se

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

They were joined to Forest 1 DomainB. The error is when trying to map from a server in Forest2 DomainA. There's a trust at that level as well, if that matters. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

I am taking it that when you did the cifs setup, you joined the first domain? If you are cifs only then you might be able to get by with using the altSecurityIdentities attribute. It's been awhile but I think there are problems if you use NFS qtrees. Question: Are the forests in the same timez

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

His response: OK, it's guesswork at this stage but I want to suggest that when they ran CIFS setup on the controllers they selected Option 4. That suggests they did not join the controllers to the domain and are using some LDAP/NIS authentication mechanism and therefore, yes, the controllers ar

Re: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

Aha. Isn't there some problem with SPNs due to authorization? It tries to use the computer account to log in, or something. I'm sure NetApp sorted it IIRC, are you at latest level of [whatever NetApp uses?] ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: David Lum Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:10

Re: vSentry

Looks pretty compelling. I'd be interested in hearing about your experience when/if you're allowed to share... - Sean On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Webster wrote: > This is the security software I have been testing under NDA. Looks like > they are now going public with the info. > > **

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

The message is "the account is not authorized to log in from this station" whenever trying to map a drive to it from DOMAIN2. It works from DOMAIN1 (which is in a different forest than DOMAIN2 Dave From: Mathew Shember [mailto:mathew.shem...@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

I've passed the info along. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers DFL: 2003 OTAP version: 803Pp2 Windows versions of cli

Re: This is what I get....

Again, cheers...I'm surprised it reads well given the interruptions by the guy tiling my bathroom, children looking for attention and cats dropping hints that their stomachs are empty during the time I spent writing it :-) ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: "Free, Bob" Date: Wed,

Re: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

If youre having the same problem in the link below you can try prefixing a backslash to your username "\user" to send a blank domain name. Also check the cifs options on the filer for smb2 > options cifs.smb2 From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent:

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

What exactly are you trying to do? The filers will appear in AD as server. Mapping a windows server to NetApp? Do you have a cifs license for the filer? From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:27 AM To: NT System Ad

Re: Side effects of Adobe updates

Do the users get sick when they have Chromium installed? I've heard of flyby installs of Chrome and the Ask toolbar, but chromium? that is wicked! On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > > Trying to give back a bit to the community... > > We've found that folks who are blind

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

DFL: 2003 OTAP version: 803Pp2 Windows versions of client devices are 2003 and 2008 R2 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-pa

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

This is what a senior NetApp engineer says: You're not dealing with storage as a matter of fact. We natively join the domain and look like a Windows box - for the most part. Question to ask them before I answer you. DFL of AD. Version on OnTAP on the storage and Windows version of the client de

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

Yes, but no experience with SMB. Why do you need SMB for a Windows server to map to CIFS shares? From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party S

RE: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers

I wouldn't do that. But let me check with a netapp guy. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NetApp CIFS, Windows Servers and Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers I am being asked to enable t

Re: This is what I get....

You're getting the hang of this... :) * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:58 AM, James Rankin wrote: > I just did a blog post regarding user rights elevation - obviously there's > loads of differen

RE: GPO Printer install non-admins

This what you are looking for? I finally figured it out. I figured that I'd share: I was sorting my labs AD Computers into OUs. I then assigned a blank group policy for the printers on that OU. Using the Printer Manager, I installed the printers and drivers as a TCP/IP printer on my print

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Hit send too soon, trying to drink beer and email at the same time isn't ideal ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: Webster Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:24:18 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Think you've probably hit the nail on the head there. AppSense in earlier versions used to struggle with the profile locations of Office toolbar settings. It does it natively now but they were always problematic. ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: Webster Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 1

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Where are your UPM folders stored? Home drives on a DFS share? ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: "Tom Miller" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:05:04 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode Yes a

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

---Blackberried -Original Message- From: "Tom Miller" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:05:04 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode Yes and yes. XenApp 6.5. I think, or I hope, I've narrowed it d

RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Ignore the title and look at this article. http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX130665 Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Subject: RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps openin

RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Yes and yes. XenApp 6.5. I think, or I hope, I've narrowed it down to UPM. What I am seeing with Word, for some users, is that they attempt to open Word. UPM folder gets created (if it's not there in the share already). Word never loads. User clicks Word again and then they get the failed

RE: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Was the package installed as an admin? Does the package have the “run all from my computer” option selected for all Office items? Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Subjec

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

Are these x64 servers running XA6/6.5? ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: "Tom Miller" Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:23:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode This is still an issue for so

Re: XenApp baffle: Word 2010 keeps opening in repair mode

This is still an issue for some users. I have not yet tracked it down to the UPM profile folder, online plugin version, or something else. And sometimes a user cannot get into Word, sometimes fine. I just hung up from my Citrix partner. He told me this is "definitely" an issue of installatio

RE: Lease requiring warranty on all hardware?

The ones we've used usually don't care with the caveat that they want working kit returned at the end of the lease, whether it's kept working by warrantee or because you paid to replace it when it broke out of warranty is up to you. I suspect it varies though. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:dav

RE: This is what I get....

Read. Relevant. Forwarded!! From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: This is what I get I just did a blog post regarding user rights elevation - obviously there's loads of different ways to do this,

Re: This is what I get....

Well, my hit counter was looking a bit low today... ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: Webster Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:19:02 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: This is what I get I vote for shameful self-promotion! :) Shame, Shame,

RE: Citrix Terminal server

Holy cow that is some OLD Citrix software. Per-User CALs are not tracked so are you saying no one can connect to the MetaFrame server? Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultr

Re: Citrix Terminal server

What error do you get trying to use it? A citrix licensing error? If so you will need to identify the citrix licensing server and have a look at the web console on that system. Dependent on your citrix version, the policies in the citrix console should tell you the licensing server (what version

RE: Citrix Terminal server

Hi They are per user cals So is that it I cant use the server now is this what I should be looking at then ? Thanks Nigel Parker Systems Engineer Ultraframe (UK) Ltd Tel: 01200 452329 Fax: 01200 452201 Web: www.ultraframe.com Email: mailt

Re: This is what I get....

I just did a blog post regarding user rights elevation - obviously there's loads of different ways to do this, just thought it was fairly relevant to the discussion (or it's just shameless self-promotion, take your pick) :-) http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/using-appsense-application-ma

RE: This is what I get....

BTW, I like where your response was coming from. It is the same tact I took. We will make it work the way the users need it to without them having admin rights. And then I delivered on that promise. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:48 AM To: NT S

RE: This is what I get....

+1 After this reply to my coworker, I started working on exactly this. Since we are basically a SaaS shop, our exec's have a habit of focusing only on client-side IT issues/development and employee-facing IT is scarcely on any C-level's radar. I am also guessing this is not unusual for this typ

RE: Btw what is everyone using for enterprise based malware tools

Yep using portable apps also, with a locked stick... Z Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 12:54 PM To: NT System Admin