But I read it on the Internet...!
Bonjour...
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email: dgu...@che.orgmailto:dgu...@che.org
Office: 610.550.3595 | Cell:
Nice, definitely relates to the cloud...
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and confidential
and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this message,
My initial question concerned cloud as if it's leaving the clients' building
via Internet, the transfer data rate is the same weather it's just offsite or
true cloud.
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I think you gave a good presentation Webster, and I didn't even get a beer
at break time.
I even learned a couple of things about DFL and KCC.
Thanks!
Jeff
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
Pretty pathetic attempt at a presentation but if you have an hour
We have two of their units.
One miSAN-D8 with 8 x 3 tb SATA drives.
One iSAND with 6 x SAS drive and 6 x SATA drives.
We’ve been quite happy with the support overall. We had two drives in the
miSAND fail. They provide a spare for us to keep on site, replace the failed
drive, send it back to
... weather ... cloud...
I see what you did there.
-sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup to cloud?
My initial question concerned cloud as if it's leaving the clients'
building via
Great. Thanks for the feedback.
Thanks
Webster
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: My Experts 2 Experts Conference Presentation from Hamburg, Germany
I think you gave a good presentation Webster,
One note: It looks like Traffic Shaping and the Explicit Web Proxy option
are no longer available under the new OS for certain pieces of hardware,
including my 40C. I suspect that anything in the SOHO range had it
removed.
I'm going to downgrade to v4.0 MR3 patch 11, as advised by support.
FTFY
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 7:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup to cloud?
But I read it on the InternetCloud...!
Bonjour...
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging
We fall under some of those and we do off site backups. We use Iron
Mountain. If we need to under contract thy will overnight physical media
to us. We have terra bytes of data we do this with. Fortunately it's not
my group that handles it as it's not something that interests me overly
much.
Like a good neighbor.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup to cloud?
FTFY
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 7:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Can’t speak to much for vm performance.
We have one esxi 5.0 host with 4 guests on the isand and performance on that
small load is very good.
Our main use is a datastore for dpm backups.
From: Scott Kaufman [mailto:bskauf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:53 AM
To: NT System
This is where the term the cloud becomes murky, in my opinion. If I'm sending
data over a private circuit to a 3rd party data center, is that really the
cloud?
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike,
I have use Cybernetics gear in the past. Make sure you check the support
options very carefully and understand what type of response you're entitled
to before pulling the trigger.
Also make sure the unit you're considering is on the HCL for both VMware
and Hyper-V.
For inexpensive iSCSI
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Guyer, Don dgu...@che.org wrote:
This is where the term “the cloud” becomes murky, in my opinion. If I’m
sending data over a private circuit to a 3rd party data center, is that
really “the cloud”?
If you ask the marketing department, Yes.
If you ask the
Actually I don't care what they call it as long as the specific service is
defined. I care that I get to use it instead of the old solution so if
they want to call it a 'Company cloud service' then I will call it 'Company
cloud service'.
This back and forth stuff saying 'marketing is evil' or
There's the private Cloud, which is your own data center, and the public
Cloud which is someone else's data center, and then hybrid Cloud which is a
mixture of both.
Well, and then there's the Adobe Cloud.
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2013/02/14/adobe-ceo-makes-you-hate-adobe-a
As Ken pointed out, certain governmental organizations have begun defining
exactly what a cloud means to them. The US government now adheres to a specific
definition of a cloud. At least, there is a proposed specific definition.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Chris, if you look at who that certification is targeting, the ROI is very,
very straightforward.
Lowering the price wouldn't lower the barrier that much, and the cost of
the overall process must come from somewhere.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
Dude all you had to do was pay several thousand pounds to take the official
VMware training course, a couple of hundred pounds to take (and pass) the cert
exam and VMware would have given you a copy of VMware Workstation for free!
Sheez, some people.
Thanks
Webster
From:
Or grabbed it from the Pirate Bay ;-)
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Webster webs...@carlwebster.com
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:03:59
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System
Would that be known as Cloud storage?..
*don't answer that, being sarcastic in light of other threads*
: )
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email:
Don't want to keep on this thread, it's obvious that most of you are in
disagreement with me. I'm OK with that. But to your comment:
I think I get who the certification is targeting. My point is that I think
there is a larger population out there that might be interested in and
possibly be
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Chinnery, Paul pa...@mmcwm.com wrote:
I had a conference call with our vendor this afternoon. Here is where the
error occurs:
I open up a command prompt and go to this folder on the server:
z:\\\\0
I then type in :
MD
No - I disagree. Whilst, in IT, there is much marketing BS from vendors wanting
to sell you stuff, the core cloud definitions are pretty well settled IMHO.
Most people use a variation of what NIST has published:
Features:
* Perception of infinite capacity, with rapid elasticity (as far
I suppose one issue is that for every person that says “$20,000 is too much, it
should be $10,000 and lots more people would do it”, there’s another person
that will say “$10,000 is too much, it should be $5,000 and lots more people
would do it”, and so on.
Cheers
Ken
From: Christopher Bodnar
Start the calculation one step further back. Maybe it costs 2.8 million to run
those 4 sessions per year for them to break even. In an attempt to lower the
bar, they’ve already cut the cost in half and eaten the 1.4 million. If so,
they’ve chosen a pretty fair split – MS pays half; candidate
Maybe you know a different group of 'most people' then I do. While I like
your definition and wish it was more in use by 'most people' the only
people that count are the ones that cut checks near you.
I am all for agreed upon definitions and I have seen movement among some
marketers to infer
Marketers will always hang their product on the 'latest' cool thing - that's
the same in all markets, not just IT. What matters is how much is absorbed at
face value by decision makers.
We may be in different markets, or exposed to different people. But the
architects and CIO/CTO type people
ToString() doesn't work for you? Convert-* don't work for you?
I'm a little confused as to what you want to do...
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 7:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Powershell question
Hey guys,
I have a
Ugh, just got schooled by a .net dev:)
So the issue is that when I use an xpath to carve up an xml config file locally
and ship the System.Xml.XmlDocument
object off to a remote computer via remoting, it gets serialized, so its almost
useless at the far end.
What I plan to do is convert all
Part of the allure, prestige and clout of the cert is that it *isn't* open
to more people.
Scarcity does have value, and to both Ken's and Scott's points, even a
$2500 cut-off would annoy many.
It's not like Microsoft doesn't have other, affordable yet valuable certs
out there to cover the
I'm not really familiar with SkyDrive and GoogleDrive - they're more targeted
at consumers right? What about the corporate offerings? Can you just get more
and more storage as required?
For Amazon EC2 - the scalability is in the number of machines you can buy, not
in the configuration of each
I came across the same issue with a recently purchased 40C and was also
disappointed.
The 60C (soon to be 60D with 2 x the performance) has the traffic shaping
option and pretty much everything else.
Maybe I didn't look hard enough but it certainly isn't made obvious on their
website that
*I think that’s what’s meant by “perception of infinite capacity”.*
Fair enough, Ken.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for
the SMB market…***
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:47 PM,
Bulk reply here.
- Printers are just an object in the directory of class printQueue. There is no
SID or anything like that attached to them.
- The printer object needs to go away, eventually because it has the UNC path
to the share on it
- If you go to ViewShow Objects as Containers (or
As others have noted, it costs a good bit of money just to put these classes on
– both the delivery and all of the background work (courseware dev, exam dev,
management overhead, etc.).
Your dollar figure may be little in the grand scheme of a company of
Microsoft’s scale, but, at the end of
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
Bulk reply here.
- Printers are just an object in the directory of class printQueue. There is
no SID or anything like that attached to them.
- The printer object needs to go away, eventually because it has the UNC
38 matches
Mail list logo
