We do it with one most of the time, with a second (who is actually
management) trained to step in if an emergency comes up.
"David Lum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/12/2008 11:58 AM
Please respond to
"NT System Admin Issues"
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
cc
because our main
product is currently web delivered, I’m wondering if we’re overstaffed
or understaffed or someone in the “normal” range.
I would expect that in a more typical file/print/Exchange/SharePoint
(intranet) environment that 175 servers would mean a few thousand end
users and thus
cripting
> god like MBS, then 1 maybe 2 (just so he can have someone to talk to).
>
>
> Webster
>
> - Original Message
> From: David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: 175 servers
>
> Here’s an open-ended question, but with 175 Windows servers, how man
:) x2
If you have a nice 1-1 ratio there is plenty of time for Dilbert and such
-troy
From: Carl Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 175 servers
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a
hange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 175 servers
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a scripting god
like MBS, then 1 maybe 2 (just so he can have som
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a scripting god like
MBS, then 1 maybe 2 (just so he can have someone to talk to).
Webster
- Original Message
From: David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 175 servers
Here’s an open-ended question, but with 175 W
that's
> probably why their support was so garbage
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 12 February 2008 16:59
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* 175 servers
>
>
>
> Here's an open-end
2 I would say
EDS used to tell us one man could maintain 500 servers, but that's probably
why their support was so garbage
_
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 February 2008 16:59
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 175 servers
Here's an open-ende
I agree with 2-3 admins.
-Brian
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 175 servers
I'd say 2-3. You have to figure in disasters, backups,
vacations/sick-days an
I'd say 2-3. You have to figure in disasters, backups, vacations/sick-days
and the likes.
_
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 175 servers
About one and a half full-timers.
Re
About one and a half full-timers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 175 servers
Here's an open-ended question
would expect that in a more typical file/print/Exchange/SharePoint
(intranet) environment that 175 servers would mean a few thousand end
users and thus perhaps a dozen IS staff.
Dave Lum - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in
12 matches
Mail list logo
