RE: AV Opinions

: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 5:08 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Installation for me was pretty straightforward. I had no problem installing the Enterprise Console on the VM I created for it. I created a SCCM package

RE: AV Opinions

#x27;ve committed to management to have the deployment completed by 10/31. Jim From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Sat 10/9/2010 3:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions So the Sophos guys came in cheaper, but

RE: AV Opinions

oseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Yup, And FF is prohibitively expensive in small environments, but it is my favorite. Most reliable I have ever used, _never_ had an FP or a dead machine or a bad dat

RE: AV Opinions

istinguish clients (file servers vs. desktops in licensing terms). I have yet to see their console though. Thanks for everything guys, jlc From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 4:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AV Opinions Or Vipre, because

Re: AV Opinions

Don't see much Trend chatter either. - Original Message - From: "Ryan Finnesey" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 1:12:24 AM Subject: RE: AV Opinions No one as commented on the Forefront products. From: Maglin

Re: AV Opinions

. > > > > > > *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 4:04 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: AV Opinions > > > > We thought their management sucked too. Their SALES management, that

RE: AV Opinions

No one as commented on the Forefront products. From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 4:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions We thought their management sucked too. Their SALES management, that is. J From: Ray

RE: AV Opinions

We thought their management sucked too. Their SALES management, that is. J From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions We thought pretty much everything about their management sucked, including agents

RE: AV Opinions

We thought pretty much everything about their management sucked, including agents. From: Alan Davies [mailto:adav...@cls-services.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 5:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Hmmm ... my comments were more around the ability to manage

RE: AV Opinions

13-657-0849 Office 813-758-6850 Cell 813-341-1270 Fax From: Alan Davies [mailto:adav...@cls-services.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions It will find it easily, as, I hope, would any AV! It cannot stop an infected computer c

RE: AV Opinions

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 5:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions We will be moving away from McCrappy after our current agreement expires. Not necessarily because of how their product performs (but that is part of it), b

RE: AV Opinions

. You need to patch Windows to protect against Conficker. a From: Ames Matthew B [mailto:mba...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 07 October 2010 14:33 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Well Sophos just found a copy of it in a RECYCLER directory which

RE: AV Opinions

Well Sophos just found a copy of it in a RECYCLER directory which was a couple of levels off the root (so not the active recycler directory). From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net] Sent: 07 October 2010 12:39 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions

RE: AV Opinions

out of hours US support! a From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net] Sent: 07 October 2010 12:42 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions That's interesting, because we absolutely hated McAfee and it's enterprise console, and couldn

RE: AV Opinions

Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:36 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions I guess we

RE: AV Opinions

I guess we should have had your sales rep. *sigh* From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Wish I could say the same here, basically they gave us everything and the boat for like 3+ yrs

RE: AV Opinions

problem to deal with now. Z Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

RE: AV Opinions

. I doubt they really care now that they're in bed with Intel. -Paul From: Ray [mailto:rz...@qwest.net] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 6:42 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions That's interesting, because we absolutely hated McAfee and it's enterpris

RE: AV Opinions

, 2010 2:42 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Sophos seem to be excellent detection wise. As for not detecting Conficker below, that'll have been another issue as there is no AV product out there that can't detect it. If I had to guess, perhaps one host was in

RE: AV Opinions

seems to be mediocre at best. If I was picking based on support alone, I’d probably be picking Kaspersky. From: Ames Matthew B [mailto:mba...@qinetiq.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions We run Sophos here, and it seems to do a

RE: AV Opinions

is try it, but persevere don't go off a quick glance as other products look better on that basis IMO. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: 07 October 2010 12:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions What's their console like, how does it

RE: AV Opinions

What's their console like, how does it integrate if at all with AD? Thanks! jlc From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Avira Antivir is very good. I tend to take the view of layers

RE: AV Opinions

eal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AV Opinions I use and recommend NOD32+Malwarebytes. http://www.eset.com/press-center/awards -- ME2 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Joseph L. Casa

Re: AV Opinions

Look at ESET NOD32 and Avast. Sophos is okay, too. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the

RE: AV Opinions

environment, it may frustrate you a little. Going from 7 to 9 didn't improve these grumbles much ... a From: Ames Matthew B [mailto:mba...@qinetiq.com] Sent: 07 October 2010 08:12 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions We run Sophos h

RE: AV Opinions

tober 2010 00:09 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AV Opinions At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the AV to something new and current. Vipre and Forefront excluded (I know enough about those already), what else are you guys using that's good? It'

RE: AV Opinions

tht, Matt From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: 07 October 2010 01:23 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Give Sophos a long look. I firmly believe they are the best of breed that nobody seems to talk about. They don

Re: AV Opinions

Whatever you go with, the belt and braces approach is always the best (also known as "defense in depth"). No matter what AV you choose, everything misses stuff at some point. At my last job, we had Vipre on the TS desktops, Sophos at the mail perimeter, occasional scans with MalwareBytes and the ba

Re: AV Opinions

I use and recommend NOD32+Malwarebytes. http://www.eset.com/press-center/awards -- ME2 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the AV > to something new and current. > > Vipre and Forefront excluded (I kno

RE: AV Opinions

We switched to Sophos. Kaspersky was also in the running. From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AV Opinions I'd look for the top performers http://www.virusbtn.com

RE: AV Opinions

Great, I will look at it! Thanks, jlc From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 6:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AV Opinions Give Sophos a long look. I firmly believe they are the best of breed that nobody seems to talk about. They

RE: AV Opinions

just a very satisfied customer so far. Jim From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wed 10/6/2010 7:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AV Opinions At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the

RE: AV Opinions

Wow, never heard of trustport, they seem to be kicking but? From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: AV Opinions I'd look for the top performers http://www.virusbtn.com<http://www.viru

Re: AV Opinions

I'd look for the top performers http://www.virusbtn.com - Sean On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the AV > to something new and current. > > Vipre and Forefront excluded (I know enough about those alr

AV Opinions

At one of the shops that I look after, I have been asked to change the AV to something new and current. Vipre and Forefront excluded (I know enough about those already), what else are you guys using that's good? It's been a while since I looked at all the other vendors, I have such little time

Re[2]: AV Opinions

Kaspersky is nothing but trouble. It's bloated. These fast updates sometimes equal trouble also. I know a few times last year when they updated and it screwed up clients. In fact, once they updated their AV to look for updates on a beta test server and for days no one could update. When approached

RE: AV Opinions

es Subject: RE: AV Opinions I was at a conference recently, and shared a couple of cool liquid refreshments with an in-the-know MSFT person, speaking off the record, of course. This person made the comment that Kaspersky was generally #1 for getting updated high-quality definitions out ASAP. Per

RE: AV Opinions

I'm checking out Bit Defender.they seem to have quality AV software. Robert From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AV Opinions Anyone using Kaspersky and F-Secure? Looking at their two pro

RE: AV Opinions

used them yet, but next time I renew a license, I'll be taking a close look at their engine and updates and cost. From: Joseph L. Casale [jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: AV Opinions An

AV Opinions

Anyone using Kaspersky and F-Secure? Looking at their two products now, it seems Kaspersky has a Squid module for our proxy which is kinda cool. Any opinions on the management aspects? Any current users with opinions on the quality of support? Thanks, jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security