RE: NOD32 V4 CFG File Share

: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NOD32 V4 CFG File Share Hey guys; Anyone out there using nod32 version 4 that has a good config file for server / clients they want to share? I thought it would be

RE: NOD32 V4 CFG File Share

Lol yeah I was looking for a baseline, clearly no one would include their license info. -Original Message- From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 2:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NOD32 V4 CFG File Share Wouldn't that r

NOD32 V4 CFG File Share

Hey guys; Anyone out there using nod32 version 4 that has a good config file for server / clients they want to share? I thought it would be a good resource to have handy. Thx! Carlos Garcia-Moran Server / Storage Engineer Sprague Energy www.spragueenergy.com

RE: File share

"Glen Johnson" wrote on 12/23/2008 01:24:28 PM: > We have a cisco asa but and my understanding could be wrong here, but if > I install the VPN client on a home computer, the user starts the vpn > client and connects, isn't their home computer now connected to my > internal LAN? > If their home com

RE: File share

System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File share I'd go WebDAV. Client part is built into XP and Vista. Server part exists in most web servers (including IIS). You can secure it using TLS/SSL (and require client certs if you want in addition to server certs) Cheers Ken > -Original

Re: File share

rmal 2-channel nature makes > such tunneling difficult. > > Cheers > Ken > >> -Original Message- >> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 4:24 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: Re:

RE: File share

lto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 23 December 2008 6:08 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: File share > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: > > What would be the groups recommendation for giving users access to file > > shares via the in

RE: File share

Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 4:24 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: File share > > Nit-pick: SFTP isn't 'FTP over SSH'. FTP over SSH, is just that - FTP >

Re: File share

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: > Guess I should have been clearer, non state owned computers cannot > connect to our LAN so no VPN. > Not just security but policy I don't make, just enforce. > Thanks. > Glen. Uh, the way you're stating your solution space is backward from w

RE: File share

essage- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 2:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: File share One can't control the possibility of malware on ANY computer, state owned or not. As a state contractor that has to adhere to their strict standar

Re: File share

ue Dec 23 13:21:52 2008 Subject: RE: File share Don't beg And NO, you can't dictate the USE of such, only deny connections for those that don't match the requirement. Not a viable alternative in every environment... In many places, if you dictate the use of specific software

Re: File share

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Bill Monicher wrote: > From what I've seen VPNs provide MORE secure than any other option, Say it with me now: "Security is a process, not a product." (Bruce Scheiner) VPN's don't provide security. Neither does SSH, or SSL, or any other acronym. They can b

Re: File share

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Nit-pick: SFTP isn't 'FTP over SSH'. FTP over SSH, is just that - FTP > tunneled-over SSH. SFTP is its own protocol. Er, okay, yah, bad wording on my part. Correct, SFTP isn't RFC-959 FTP tunneled over SSH. But SFTP is a protocol

RE: File share

o: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File share "so I CANNOT transmit malware directly from my home network to their network. Well, can't while connected to VPN anyway :)" If it is NOT a state owned (or company owned in another scenario) computer, then there is no way to enforce a p

RE: File share

rom this great group throughout the year. Merry Christmas and a happy and prosperous new year to all. Glen. -Original Message- From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 1:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File share "so I CANNOT trans

RE: File share

-Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 1:15 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: File share Beg to differ, look up Microsoft IAG. Not cheap but you CAN dictate AV, patch level, etc on the connecting endpoint. John W. Co

Re: File share

Admin Issues Sent: Tue Dec 23 13:13:06 2008 Subject: RE: File share "so I CANNOT transmit malware directly from my home network to their network. Well, can't while connected to VPN anyway :)" If it is NOT a state owned (or company owned in another scenario) computer, then there is no

RE: File share

pinion, your mileage may vary Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security -Original Message- From: Bill Monicher [mailto:bmacd5...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: File share I don't know what VPN system

Re: File share

Nit-pick: SFTP isn't 'FTP over SSH'. FTP over SSH, is just that - FTP tunneled-over SSH. SFTP is its own protocol. -- ME2 On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Glen Johnson wrote: >> Guess I should have been clearer, non state owned computers c

Re: File share

I don't know what VPN system you are using, or have looked at, but we are using a Cisco VPN. Only domain members can connect using it. If you try to install the client on your home PC, then is tries to authenticate the computer agains the domain, which fails. The national network people set up a

Re: File share

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Glen Johnson wrote: > Guess I should have been clearer, non state owned computers cannot > connect to our LAN so no VPN. SFTP isn't a VPN, it's the FTP protocol over SSH. You're still allowing access to resources on your network, of course, but that's what Web

RE: File share

Yep, it's read-only access to file shares through OWA 2007 (when configured via segmentation options). -Bonnie From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: File share Michael. Humm, I didn't know OW

Re: File share

Johnson wrote: > Michael. > > Humm, I didn't know OWA 2007 had that feature so I started reading cause > we're getting ready to deploy ex2007. > > Then I read that file share access is read-only. Bummer. > > Anyone know if that is accurate or if there is any workarou

RE: File share

ystem Admin Issues Subject: Re: File share On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: > What would be the groups recommendation for giving users access to file > shares via the internet. > VPN isn't an option due to security concerns. Well, if you're *really* con

RE: File share

Michael. Humm, I didn't know OWA 2007 had that feature so I started reading cause we're getting ready to deploy ex2007. Then I read that file share access is read-only. Bummer. Anyone know if that is accurate or if there is any workaround for that limitation. No sharepoint so it

Re: File share

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Glen Johnson wrote: > What would be the groups recommendation for giving users access to file > shares via the internet. > VPN isn't an option due to security concerns. Well, if you're *really* concerned about security, I would suggest SFTP with public key auth

RE: File share

en Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: File share What would be the groups recommendation for giving users access to file shares via the internet. VPN isn't an option due to security concerns. Sharepoint or

File share

What would be the groups recommendation for giving users access to file shares via the internet. VPN isn't an option due to security concerns. Sharepoint or some other app/technology. Anything better in server 2008 for this. I'm willing to read and learn the how-to if pointed in the best direct

RE: File share/NTFS access help

Thanks, Bonnie! Will try that now. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:04:08 -0700Subject: RE: File share/NTFS access help Check out the permissions setup for a “drop folder” http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc780823.aspx. -Bonnie From: Jim

RE: File share/NTFS access help

Check out the permissions setup for a "drop folder" http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc780823.aspx. -Bonnie From: Jim Slattery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: File share/NTFS access help I'm setting

File share/NTFS access help

I'm setting up a system for a non-profit school that has students coming in next Tuesday. Currently setting up the computer lab. One request was for us to set up a folder structure like this:Labdata (root of share) -ToTeacher (subfolder) -ToStudents (subfolder) Rights should allow - ToTeache

OT: Community File Share service...

Thought this might be something a lot of folks would be interested in. http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rtrent/archive/2008/08/02/the-new-myitforum-c om-community-file-share-service-unveiled.aspx ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ <http://www.sunb