Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

of evidence is not evidence of > absence.." - which I *think* came from CSI > > Paul G. > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: 05 November 2009 19:18 > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

Or as I've often seen it put: "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.." - which I *think* came from CSI Paul G. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 November 2009 19:18 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NewSID retired -

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Bill Monicher [mailto:bmacd5...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth To make a long story short, we will now be forced to use sysprep, which is

Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

To make a long story short, we will now be forced to use sysprep, which is what Microsoft has wanted all along, which effectively renders any imaging tool useless. The standard stuff about imaging part way through is only a partial solution, and while it may apply to physical boxes, it will mean t

Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:03 AM, David Lum wrote: > We had problems with GPO’s working unless NewSID was used. Was the machine a domain member when you cloned it? > Here's my understanding: Here's mine... ;-) > Each machine has its own SID Correct. This is generated at install time, o

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

eration as an option." -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: >

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

05, 2009 2:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > I don't think that Mark was saying that the local machine SID doesn't > matter ... Not in those words, but I

Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > I don't think that Mark was saying that the local machine SID doesn't > matter ... Not in those words, but I can't see any other way to interpret things. He said that there was no need to worry about it being unique, and so NewSID is now

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

ssues Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth Link to the tweet? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth bah. we know you re

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

Link to the tweet? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth bah. we know you read my tweet on it. :-) From: Mike

RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

bah. we know you read my tweet on it. :-) From: Mike Gill [lis...@canbyfoursquare.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich

NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth

http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2009/11/03/3291024.aspx Saw this last night. -- Mike Gill ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~