gt;>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:48 PM
>>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>>> Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
>>>
>
ng. We dropped Altavista like a rock. Same thing could happen to
>> Google.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:48 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: R
thing could happen to
> Google.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:48 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
>
> This too shall pass...
&
stem Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
This too shall pass...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
gned up
for gmail 5 years ago
From: c.bo...@gmail.com [mailto:c.bo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Same thing happened to me. When you view a message that goes to your
address (wit
+1
I rarely find a site that can saturate my FIOS connection.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:p...@optimumdata.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
I seriously doubt we would
I seriously doubt we would notice a difference.
A 1Gb pipe just means you have 1Gb to the ISP. That doesn't mean other
sites on the 'net will be able to feed you content at 1Gb/sec.
On 2/10/2010 10:35 PM, Richard Stovall wrote:
> But, to be completely honest, I can't even conceive of what a gigab
ses them the China or Iran
> business. They have plenty to do otherwise.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
&
+1
--
ME2
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Levicki wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I believe that gmail ignores periods in the left hand side of the address,
> so in fact those two email addresses are the same account, i.e. not
> forwarding. You could equally say the same about
> c.h.o.u.s.e.m
Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:46 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
>
> The seriousness of China and Iran's actions doesn't justify the word
> "attack".
>
> China
This too shall pass...
-ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Verizon Smartphone
-Original Message-
From: "Michael B. Smith"
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:01:06
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Google is an internet darli
LOL
-ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Verizon Smartphone
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:59:05
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Maybe you could email google.support+non.complaint.je
010 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Making it a little more fun, I learned some time ago that Google doesn't
look at the '.' in my address, but considers lee.douglas and leedouglas
to be identical. What's maddening is t
Like sell their own cable connection service...
-Original Message-
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
The seriousness of China and Iran's ac
10 5:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Plus, do a little digging and you'll see some serious Google connections to
the US gov't. They're protected. Why do you think countries like China and
Iran are banning them? Its a direct a
cons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Google is an internet darling and has been pretty much since day one.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From
Most likely you only created your account as c.house...@gmail.com, and
there really is no mailbox chouse...@gmail.com
Here's the rest of the story: Google has stated (search through their
help and blogs, I don't remember exactly where I saw it, but it *was*
in Google) that if you have a mailbox th
to be wrong"?
Carl
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
No.
Gmail's behavior is not RFC compliant.
They started out using the '+'s fo
sses can match a mailbox.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:48 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject:
quick so they expanded into full-stops.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
No.
Gmail's behavior is not RFC compliant.
They started out using the '+'s for "throw-away" a
bercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Kinda like Exchange can have multiple smtp aliases for the same account..;)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Carl Houseman wrote:
t;
> Thanks for clearing up the mystery.
>
>
>
> Carl
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:36 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
>
>
>
&g
lExchange.com
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Oh brother . I guess a mail server can do whatever it wants regarding
matching addresses to mailboxes for delivery
Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: Google Username Assistance - huh?
Hi Carl,
I believe that gmail ignores periods in the left hand side of the address,
so in fact those two email addresses are the same account, i.e. not
forwarding. You could equally say the same about
c.h.o.u.s.e.m@gmail.com
Same thing happened to me. When you view a message that goes to your
address (without the period, mind you) a little note shows up under the To:
line that says "Is this me?" or something similar, and it explains the
whole ordeal.
On Feb 10, 2010 3:31pm, Lee Douglas wrote:
> Making it a lit
Hi Carl,
I believe that gmail ignores periods in the left hand side of the address,
so in fact those two email addresses are the same account, i.e. not
forwarding. You could equally say the same about c.h.o.u.s.e.m@gmail.com
, ch.ou.s...e.m.@gmail.com, you get the i
Making it a little more fun, I learned some time ago that Google doesn't
look at the '.' in my address, but considers lee.douglas and leedouglas to
be identical. What's maddening is that I originally tried to sign up as
LeeDouglas and was told it was unavailable, hence I ended up with
lee.doug...@g
OK, this seems very weird to me. For some time, mail addressed to
chouse...@gmail.com has been delivered to my c.house...@gmail.com mailbox.
I thought, at some point, I created the chouseman mailbox and configured
forwarding. But I couldn't sign in to Google with the chouseman address and
no atte
29 matches
Mail list logo
