We do it with one most of the time, with a second (who is actually
management) trained to step in if an emergency comes up.
"David Lum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/12/2008 11:58 AM
Please respond to
"NT System Admin Issues"
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
cc
Subject
175 servers
Here?s an o
Just one for the work and another for redundancy but that could be
someone in a related department. Did I seriously just apply N+1 to
personnel?
--Blaine
David Lum wrote:
Here’s an open-ended question, but with 175 Windows servers, how many
admins would you think it would take to maintain
Do you run 24/7? Do you have customers outside north america? Do you
require off hours pager support?
I agree you need to plan for coverage, vacation, personal days,
scheduled down time, etc.
Planning 2 per shift (or some form of overlap) allows all the nitty
gritty details to be checked (lo
:) x2
If you have a nice 1-1 ratio there is plenty of time for Dilbert and such
-troy
From: Carl Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 175 servers
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a
hange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Carl Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 175 servers
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a scripting god
like MBS, then 1 maybe 2 (just so he can have som
If you are as good as Shook, then 175 admins. If you are a scripting god like
MBS, then 1 maybe 2 (just so he can have someone to talk to).
Webster
- Original Message
From: David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 175 servers
Here’s an open-ended question, but with 175 Windows server
1 Per every 100 machines is a good rule of thumb for generic OS and
infrastructure administration.
Roy MacDonald
On Feb 12, 2008 12:53 PM, Rankin, James R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2 I would say
>
>
>
> EDS used to tell us one man could maintain 500 servers, but that's
> probably why their
2 I would say
EDS used to tell us one man could maintain 500 servers, but that's probably
why their support was so garbage
_
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 February 2008 16:59
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 175 servers
Here's an open-ended question, bu
I agree with 2-3 admins.
-Brian
From: Louis, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 175 servers
I'd say 2-3. You have to figure in disasters, backups,
vacations/sick-days an
I'd say 2-3. You have to figure in disasters, backups, vacations/sick-days
and the likes.
_
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 175 servers
About one and a half full-timers.
Re
About one and a half full-timers.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 175 servers
Here's an open-ended question, but wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
