The only problem I have is that you are then asking the Government to
provide on-site security at a private business. I know here in Fort Worth,
the DFW International Airport is a privately owned business. I am sure that
Dallas Love Field is the same way.
I think it would be a great idea if
Ya gotta be kidding. Most of the airports are managed by local
governments and they can't get it right. What makes you think the Feds are
able to do it. Where I live (Atlanta), the General Manager is a politcal
crony of the Mayor and is an incompetent clown at best. If anything these
Security is like birth control, nothing but not doing it will allow you
to be safe.
-Original Message-
From: Kent Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
Ya gotta
it.
- ASB
- ASB
-Original Message-
From: Kent Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
Ya gotta be kidding. Most of the airports are managed by local
]
cc:
09/13/2001 Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The
idiocy continues!)
04:14 PM
: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
If anything these airports need to be privatized and
the security force needs to be trained and made to
do their jobs. It's that simple.
And what job were they supposed to be doing
4:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Clayton wrote:
Can you imagine being a passenger on a hijacked plane after this? It
won't happen again, because the next time a hijack happens, the
passengers will think of New York
: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
I am probably going to p a few folks off with this one, but think of
this. That last plane went down 1 hour and 15 minutes after the first
plane hit the WTC. I smell a cover up
Can you ping the other network? Maybe ping at least the router over
there.
-Original Message-
From: Bartolini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
One of my favorite
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
I am probably going to p a few folks off with this one, but think of
this. That last plane went down 1 hour and 15 minutes after the first
plane hit the WTC. I
they were more passive.
Ed-
-Original Message-
From: Wendell Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
Not correct about being downed by a missile unless you're a huge
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Collins, Edward H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
What I heard was that the passengers on that plane had heard the news
of what
I had the same thought.
- ASB
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
Can you imagine being a passenger on a hijacked plane after
Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
Not correct about being downed by a missile unless you're a huge conspiracy
theorist. Eyewitnesses to the plane crash in PA said
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Clayton wrote:
Can you imagine being a passenger on a hijacked plane after this? It
won't happen again, because the next time
Not at all. My only, intended point was that the plane was not shot down.
-Original Message-
From: Luke Skare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
And I guess
I like that!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
I've been thinking that it should be possible for a pilot to press
: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
I've been thinking that it should be possible for a pilot to press a button
at the first sign of trouble that would allow a plane to then be locked
locally and remotely controlled
Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Clayton wrote:
Can you imagine being a passenger on a hijacked plane after
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
I've been thinking that it should be possible for a pilot to press a
button at the first sign of trouble that would allow a plane
. There is still a chance. And with that much junk in the
way who is going to want to have sex?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy
Do you mean on the plane?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
We are right now at or near 99% no solution will be able to pass
22 matches
Mail list logo
