I don't have any experience with Dell servers, but we've been running all
Compaq servers for almost 5 years now. I've never had to make a support call
(knock on wood) on any of them. We've got 3 Compaq Proliant 1600R's, 1
Proliant 6000R, and one Proliant ML530.
Just out of curiosity, what is
When Dell runs a buy one, get one for 50% off (the current promo), the
difference is significant.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
I don't have any
I don't know about Dell, but I know that Compaq has some awesome remote
administration tools as well as some sweet objects for creating your own web
stats. We have a website that goes and queries 2000+ servers and displays
status information in 2 to 3 seconds. One of our NT Admins made this
Subject: RE: Dell servers vs.
Compaq
Please respond to NT
System Admin Issues
: Dell servers vs. Compaq
rk.com
Pontiac Coil, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
I don't have any experience with Dell servers, but we've been running all
Compaq
: RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
PM
Please respond
to NT System
We were a Compaq shop when we switched to NT 4 years ago. Since that
initial server purchase, we started buying Dell. The servers are iron clad.
If you have a problem, the support at Dell is pretty good. The one thing
that Dell does not have that I loved with Compaq was the Insight Manger
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
I didnt do the cost comparison personally, but one of our people said it's
about half.We currently have a total of about 120
, go
with Compaq, or IBM as a second choice. Good luck to you and happy
shopping.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
I don't know if you
Title: RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
We are almost totally a Compaq shop now - (48 Servers and approx 400 W/S) and I must confess to being hugely impressed, the only time we have to call support if hardware - and in the last 5 years that has been 3 Hard Drives (all part of RAID 5 with hot spare
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 30,
2001 3:48 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Dell
servers vs. Compaq
That's funny. I was just thinking that the only issues I have had with
Compaq have
about Dell.
-Original Message-
From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dell servers vs. Compaq
We are almost totally a Compaq shop now - (48 Servers and approx 400
W/S) and I must confess
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about doing things like firmware upgrades?
weak point in my experience. in general Compaq was far more
reliable for me : 800 workstations, 200 Dells, 200 CPQs, the rest
is a tutty-frutty of white boxes, IBMs, VA Linux, Suns.
=
14 matches
Mail list logo
