I tried out Enkive and MailArchiva years ago... I wan't impressed, but times
have changed since. I also see MailPiler. Those look to be your Open Source
solutions.
What's inexpensive? How many mailboxes? MailStore Server is fairly cheap if you
have only a few mailboxes.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tigran K tigr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for an open source or freeware or really inexpensive email
archiving solutions.
Any suggestions?
Running Exchange 2010 and Outlook on all clients.
Thanks
Better to ask on the sister list to this one, for
Thanks you all. I'll look into the solutions suggested.
--T
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tigran K tigr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for an open source or freeware or really inexpensive email
archiving solutions.
on it and it is doing fine.
From: Tigran K [tigr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange mail archiving solution
Thanks you all. I'll look into the solutions suggested.
--T
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Kurt Buff
will continue with my 2010 migration.
From: James Hill [mailto:falc...@gmail.com]
Posted At: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:08 PM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: Exchange 2003 to Office 365
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to Office 365
That's a very broad question with many answers
You found a cloud provider that offers Public Folders? Which one?
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to Office 365
I have Exchange 2003 standard in a 2008 Active Directory Domain.
We
Interesting. Pretty limited, but I wasn't aware that any one was doing it.
Thanks for the info.
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to Office 365
Intermedia does.
From: Michael B
Been a Pain in the arse migrating so far, as for new users that are totally in
the cloud it depends on a lot of things.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and
] On Behalf Of Michael
B. Smith
Sent: 07 February 2013 19:46
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
I think that article has made the Exchange team very mad at me.
Apparently, not such a big deal when the MVPs blog
comes to fruition,
with our business cycle, that probably means a June/July migration for us.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready
:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, February 7, 2013 7:38 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center
- Computerworld
** **
Funny thing is, I remember him posting that article, and I bookmarked
It's not hard to guess, when the article is mostly based on what MBS said...
Kurt
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, MBS
What's your take on this article?I haven't touched Exchange 2013 as
yet...
I think that article has made the Exchange team very mad at me.
Apparently, not such a big deal when the MVPs blog it and it gets put into
Redmond magazine or WindowsIT Pro magazine - but hitting ComputerWorld has
caused a lot of angst.
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent:
But it's good for you, right? I mean, how many CW readers have now
heard your name (as an Authority!), where they hadn't before...
Should be interesting to monitor the comments on that blog post now,
I'm guessing...
Kurt
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Troublemaker! Is that why you went out of the country before the article hit?
Thanks
Webster
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center
They'll get over it. If you're not afraid to say it when the emperor has no
clothes then you become a mouthpiece for the machine. Much of the
credibility and value of the MVP role comes from NOT being the mouthpiece.
IMNSHO.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm definitely not a mouthpiece. :)
I think it'll be fine. But I won't be surprised if I don't get re-awarded this
june!
From: Patrick Salmon [mailto:psal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready
Reading that just reaffirms our decision to go from 2k7 to 2k10 and not 2k13.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email: dgu...@che.orgmailto:dgu...@che.org
Office:
Salmon [mailto:psal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
They'll get over it. If you're not afraid to say it when the emperor has no
clothes then you become
What? You didn't read my initial post on January 6?
I'm insulted! :)
From: Guyer, Don [mailto:dgu...@che.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
Reading that just reaffirms
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
H
If you don't, perhaps we should start a campaign...
Kurt
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Michael B. Smith mich
| Fax: 610.271.9440
For immediate assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the
helpdesk @ 610-492-3839.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CE054D.7BF6DE00]
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange
There are some mitigations coming Real Soon Now. :)
-Original Message-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 4:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
Oh, he probably will get awarded when he answers all of my Exchange 2013
questions come Spring XO
Tsk tsk tsk
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 7:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Server 2013: Not quite ready for the data center -
Computerworld
Funny thing is, I remember him posting that article, and I bookmarked it, but I
You can't get DFL/FFL past 2003 if a 2003 DC is present, but otherwise
Exchange 2003 is happy as a clam
We have a mixed set of DCs (2003 in the overseas offices, 2008R2 in
the US), and Exchange 2003 in each of the offices. Works like a champ.
Kurt
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Michael B.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Posted At: Friday, December 7, 2012 10:24 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: Exchange 2003 and Active Directory
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 and Active Directory
You can't get DFL/FFL past 2003
, December 7, 2012 1:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 and Active Directory
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Posted At: Friday, December 7,
2012 10:24 AM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: Exchange 2003 and Active
12:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
Thanks, fixed, and we have a winner!
Because you're here and I am not on the Exchange list anymore. :)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:39 AM
To: NT System
This is most common:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/10/22/admincount-adminsdholder-sdprop-and-you.aspx
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
My first suspect would be the nefarious AdminCount attribute.
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=318180
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
Thanks from me also. I had
: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
This is most common:
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/10/22/admincount-adminsdholder-sdprop-and-you.aspx
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent
Kind of makes me wonder about the security model if you have email enabled
accounts using mobile devices that are victims of adminsdholder.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage
had to be dealt with...
And (shame face) fixing adminCount is trivial, but fixing up the ACLs (in a
script) was beyond me. :( I don't speak really good SDDL.
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010
, 2012 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
The real problem, IMO, is that even after accounts are moved out of protected
groups, inheritance is not automatically restored and adminCount set to zero.
You can't set up an EAS device with a protected
Are the versions of the iOS current? I have had that issue before a few
times. Sometimes being at the most current version for that device solved
it. The others were solved when we used a real certificate instead of the
self-signed one.
Art
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sign in using OWA Lite. Go and clean Device Associations. Re-associate.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
I have two Exchange 2010 users that can't get their accounts to
: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
Sign in using OWA Lite. Go and clean Device Associations. Re-associate.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday
Check out permission inheritance on the user object.
And why are you asking this question here, instead of the Exchange list? :P
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
Whoa
Thanks, fixed, and we have a winner!
Because you're here and I am not on the Exchange list anymore. :)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - manage mobile phone
Check out
So, the auditors are suggesting you put Exchange 2003 in the DMZ, and then
punch a bunch of holes in your FW to allow Exchange to communicate with your
DCs?
What threat are they suggesting you are going to mitigate with this
strategy? What additional risks have they highlighted would arise
Are you just going to be serving OWA (and possibly ActiveSync) to the Internet
or will you also need POP/IMAP?
The Ironport taking smtp from the Internet and passing it to your Exchange
server is the best bet for that part.
For OWA, what I would do is spin up a new Exchange 2003 server, make
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:38 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
What service do I need to disable to allow the mailboxes to
migrate from server to server but not receive Internet e-mail?
Exchange and Windows use SMTP for their own internal purposes, so
just shutting down the SMTP service
If your appliance has an external and internal interface, you could also
just unplug its internal interface.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 - 2010, disable inbound
location) before
flipping mail on.
I also don't have access to the Barracuda either :-(
Eh, worst case is I unplug the damn thing.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003
I'd go with unplugging the Internet connection.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 - 2010, disable inbound
This weekend I will be doing my last SBS2003 - SBS2011 swing. My question is
there will be
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
If I unplug that cable they have no Internet. I don't control the
firewall anymore ...
Then talk to the guy who does.
I also don't have access to the Barracuda either :-(
Ibid.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 - 2010, disable inbound
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
If I unplug that cable they have no Internet. I don't control the
firewall anymore ...
Then talk to the guy who does.
I also don't have access to the Barracuda either
My initial guess would be that it has something to do with your configuration
of Send connectors and Receive connectors OR that you don't have AD Sites fully
configured in AD Sites Services.
From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 8:36 PM
To: NT System Admin
It was our UTM filter for Credit cards that seemed to be blocking this...
WT?
-
Oh, by the way, which one's Pink?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:11, S Powell powe...@gmail.com wrote:
We have one domain that we are trying to send to and it is giving us
fits. all other email is
Dell also has a solution based on the MessageOne technology that they purchased
a few years ago. It's pretty robust. But the data sits in THEIR data center,
not yours.
ObligDisclaimer: I have done contract work for Dell and for MessageOne on that
technology.
I have also, in a prior career,
EMC has a product I lab tested called RecoverPoint:
http://www.emc.com/collateral/software/white-papers/h6395-rep-manager-recoverpoint-wp.pdf
We went with DoubleTake for cost reasons, but IMHO RecoverPoint was the
better option.
Mack S. Bolan
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jon D
Here's a quick overview for the tl;dr:
http://www.emc.com/collateral/demos/microsites/software/products/recoverpoint/recpt_2.swf
Mack S. Bolan
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Mack Bolan mack.bola...@gmail.com wrote:
EMC has a product I lab tested called RecoverPoint:
NetApp has SnapMirror
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 8:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Disaster Recovery Solutions
Outside
Bumping this mail!
I have a requirement for a number of users who will able to overwrite the
existing meetings in a particular meeting room.
Does anyone know if this is possible?
All the meeting room resources will be set to -AutomateProcessing AutoAccept
From: Fergal O'Connell
:* lunedì 8 agosto 2011 5.33
*A:* ** NT System Admin Issues**
*Oggetto:* Re: Exchange 2010 SP1 RU4 - Anyone installed it?
** **
Here's the updated info:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/07/27/announcing-the-re-release-of-exchange-2010-sp1-rollup-4.aspx
*ASB
I saw an article on it on July 29th but we have not installed yet. It will
probably wait for 2 weeks when we are taking down our exchange server to move
it to a new Virtual Host, but who knows I might decide to do it earlier, but
not today.
-Original Message-
From: HELP_PC
Here's the updated info:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/07/27/announcing-the-re-release-of-exchange-2010-sp1-rollup-4.aspx
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Terry
Ok, thx for the info. I think I got my extra ones deleted, but I'll wait til
the next upgrade to kill the whole PF tree.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
What was the process? MBS is saying it can't be done. Sounds like a challenge
to me :)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:08 PM
To: NT System
,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
No, I said it wasn't
: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
IIRC, if you have Blackberry server it may need the public folders for wireless
calendar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Crawford, Scott
crawfo...@evangel.edumailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Thanks. How 'bout after I'm done with all PFs
-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 2:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
There is currently no supported way to remove the last public folder database
from an Exchange organization except via version
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Gotcha. So, by the time E2K13 comes out, I need to have my PFs on SharePoint.
2 replicas - interesting. So, in order to make the 2nd replica, I need
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
If you are current (5.03), PFs aren't necessary. I don't remember the exact
point at which they weren't necessary, but it's been
: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Thanks. How 'bout after I'm done with all PFs?
If I were to build a new Exchange 2010 box (unlikely) and not install a PF
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
** **
If you are current (5.03), PFs aren’t necessary. I don’t remember the exact
point at which they weren’t necessary, but it’s been “a while” now.
** **
Regards,
** **
Michael B. Smith
What was the process? MBS is saying it can't be done. Sounds like a challenge
to me :)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Once you're
I don't expect that it's possible to have normal folders without the system
ones. I would leave it alone.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:54 PM
To: NT
of the public
folders, which leads me to believe they're not needed at all.
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
I don't expect that it's possible to have normal folders
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Well, I'm pretty sure I've got some extras from old servers and I was setting
out to clean up the old ones. For instance I have 5 OWAScratchPad and 5
StoreEvents. But, when I tried to determine which ones were active, I found
that neither of my
[mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
Well, I'm pretty sure I've got some extras from old servers and I was setting
out to clean up the old ones. For instance I have 5 OWAScratchPad and 5
...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 5:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
hmmm, if it ain't broke, don't fix it?
Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com 7/25/2011 3:00 PM
No they're probably not, but, they're probably also not causing you any
and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 6:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
True, but cleaning unneeded stuff now prevents having to figure
...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 7:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 System Public Folders
You can't eliminate the last replica of system folders in your organization, if
you've create a PF DB on the highest version Exchange in the organization.
To say
IIRC, if you have Blackberry server it may need the public folders for
wireless calendar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.eduwrote:
Now that we’re 100% Outlook 2007/2010 and Exhchange 2010, is there any
reason I shouldn’t delete the System Public Folders? I
B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 00:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 DAG Cluster with HT/CAS on NLB
And what does the OP mean, specifically, by “having some problems”?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http
recall the name offhand, though.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Straub, Patrick [mailto:patrick.str...@lanexpert.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 DAG Cluster with HT/CAS
...@lanexpert.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 DAG Cluster with HT/CAS on NLB
Hi Michael
I got the details from my collegue:
Specs:
* Exchange Server 2010
* All Servers installed on VMware ESX 4.1
* 2x
Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 DAG Cluster with HT/CAS on NLB
You have to burn the NLB MAC/ARP entry into the switches with Cisco. Here is
the doc -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_example09186a0080a07203.shtml.
There’s also a checkbox
Well NLB isn't very smart. I would expect it to take a bit of time for things
to converge. Does it ever converge (e.g. if you turn off one server, does it
eventually start working)?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Straub,
And what does the OP mean, specifically, by having some problems?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 5:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010
Please define The owner does not want me making any changes to this server
for reasons I don't fully understand.
Because standing up another Exchange server, and moving off some
users, and shrinking the existing databases are all some level of
change to the Exchange server...
What you want can
+1 Adding additional disks to the server is probably less intrusive and
cheaper than another Exchange license, too.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Please define The owner does not want me making any changes to this
server for reasons I don't fully
I think there is some pending legal actions involving some past
employees and he wants to keep their Mailboxes intact.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Please define The owner does not want me making any changes to this server
for reasons I don't fully
The server is maxed out drive wise.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Adding additional disks to the server is probably less intrusive and
cheaper than another Exchange license, too.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andrew S. Baker
Moving the mailboxes on the backend will not undermine any legal action.
Backing up the mailboxes beforehand will lower the risk any more...
*ASB *(Professional Bio http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at
21, 2011 10:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 question
The server is maxed out drive wise.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 Adding additional disks to the server is probably less intrusive
+and
cheaper than another
SAN + (Fibre or iSCSI)
*ASB *(Professional Bio http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.comwrote:
The server is maxed out drive wise.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49
Group
Fiserv
don.gu...@fiserv.com
Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673
Fax: 610-233-0404
www.fiserv.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 question
The server is maxed out
I just had another thought. Ideally, I'd like to install a new
Exchange 2010 Enterprise edition box. If I did this, could I:
1) Recreate the mail accounts I need going forward on the new server.
2) Have new mail routed to the new server.
3) Export relevant mail from 2003 and import into the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is some pending legal actions involving some past
employees and he wants to keep their Mailboxes intact.
Contact a lawyer who specializes in computer forensic situations,
find out what to do.
Or get
I'm hoping if I can install a new 2010 Exchange box, and start users
off fresh, I can avoid making changes to the existing 2003 box. After
getting the new server setup, and getting mail flowing in and out of
it, I would only export data from old to new. An export would not
alter anything, would
You lose deleted item recovery.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm hoping if I can install a new 2010 Exchange box, and start users
off fresh, I can avoid making changes to the existing 2003 box.
As you've been told, doing *anything* counts as making changes.
Including even
And just to point out. This isn't a technical problem, it's a legal problem
with technical implications. Once you've resolved or mitigated the legal
issues the technical ones become really easy to resolve.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm
Yes, this is really tough Google-Fu:
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=export+gal+csv+2010
Carl
From: Jim Slattery [mailto:slattery_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 9:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010: Export the GAL to a CSV
Does anyone know a
Had a friend bump me a powershell script that got me most of the way there.
Thanks,
Jim
From: slattery_...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Exchange 2010: Export the GAL to a CSV
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:50:59 -0400
Does anyone know a relatively easy
, 2011 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010: Export the GAL to a CSV
Had a friend bump me a powershell script that got me most of the way there.
Thanks,
Jim
From: slattery_...@hotmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
