Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component of
IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you should be
good to go.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732428.aspx
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of
I believe you need both 80/443 outbound opened if you are going to allow
http/https. So its two ports.
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component
of IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you
should be good to go.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732428.aspx
http
Thanks for the clarification Chris
On 9 May 2012 15:52, Christopher Bodnar christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component of
IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you should be
good to go.
Cheers
On 9 May 2012 15:52, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
I believe you need both 80/443 outbound opened if you are going to allow
http/https. So its two ports.
** **
Z
** **
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan
*Subject:* Re: Firewall-y stuff
** **
Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component of
IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you should be
good to go.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732428.aspx
*Christopher Bodnar
, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk
ezi...@lifespan.org
** **
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:05 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Firewall-y stuff
** **
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients
NO worries..
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
That's pretty
May 2012 11:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients that
are on the other side of a firewall, using SQL and BITS traffic
On 9 May 2012 15:54, Ziots, Edward
ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi
On 5 Oct 2011 at 21:08, Kurt Buff wrote:
Well, true, but IMHO it's much more important to find the root cause
ATM, since the unit has until now performed to expectations.
+1 on that suggestion. Check out the ClearOS logs. Perhaps the OP has an
infected box applying a DDOS to someone off
+1 on the ASA here, too.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall/Router recommendations
+1 on the ASA no experience with NetScreen
Jon
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Erik Goldoff egold
I would look to Cisco ASA or Juniper/Netscreen
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:15 PM
+1 on the ASA no experience with NetScreen
Jon
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Erik Goldoff egold...@gmail.com wrote:
I would look to Cisco ASA or Juniper/Netscreen
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
Depending on your budget, Check Point has some good offerings. You can get
appliances, software you can install on your own hardware, and I think even a
VMware template.
The software mode has the added benefit that you can install it on newer, more
powerful hardware as it becomes available.
Look at Fortinet's Fortigate products. Very nice with filtering, etc. available.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 2:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall/Router recommendations
Good Afternoon, list
...@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall/Router recommendations
Look at Fortinet's Fortigate products. Very nice with filtering, etc.
available.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent
Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Stringham, Steven [mailto:sstri...@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall/Router
Don't look for a new firewall right now.
Do figure out why the response is so crappy after having been fine for so long.
I take that as a signal that something has drastically changed in your
environment.
Can you characterize your current traffic? In particular, look for
indications that you're
I'd say the OP needs to both figure out the root cause, *and* buy a
new firewall as the vendor's support program's been tried and found
wantin'.
--Steve
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't look for a new firewall right now.
Do figure out why the
Well, true, but IMHO it's much more important to find the root cause
ATM, since the unit has until now performed to expectations.
Almost anything in the right class will handle what he needs, once he
figures out what's happening.
Heck, even a simple pfsense box on decent hardware will do what he
: RE: FIREWALL
Is the machine behind a hardware firewall (a.k.a. SOHO router or
better) or connected directly to the Internet?
If you said there's a hardware firewall, then what are you looking to
protect against that the hardware firewall hasn't already covered?
Carl
-Original Message
Thanks
Looks like this is worth investigating
Regards
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2011 17:39
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FIREWALL
You might want to take a look at this:
http://corelabs.coresecurity.com
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: FIREWALL
Hi
The machine is behind a router
However it has been the victim of an attack, the router offers only
minimal support (port blocking)
Thanks
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07
Most AV products today have some firewall component (although not all of the
free ones). If you're already using one, check out its firewall component.
Do you have some specific requirements?
Otherwise: http://www.google.com/search?q=free+windows+firewall
*ASB *(Find me online via About.Me
Well, maybe an old unsupported version of Zone Alarm for an unsupported OS ?
http://www.oldversion.com/ZoneAlarm.html
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker
Hi
Yep I know :-) UPGRADE
However this link maybe the best option didn't know about this site
Thanks
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2011 11:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: FIREWALL
Well, maybe an old
Subject: RE: FIREWALL
Hi
Yep I know :-) UPGRADE
However this link maybe the best option didn't know about this site
Thanks
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2011 11:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: FIREWALL
Well, maybe
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2011 14:25
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: FIREWALL
No worries ... there are a few similar sites that archive old versions
of freeware good for getting freeware that evolved to
shareware
You might want to take a look at this:
http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=Wikiaction=viewtype=projectname=Core_Force
It's a Windows port of the BSD PF firewall.
Kurt
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 02:28, Nigel Parker
nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk wrote:
Hi
Trying to find a Free
Is the machine behind a hardware firewall (a.k.a. SOHO router or better)
or connected directly to the Internet?
If you said there's a hardware firewall, then what are you looking to
protect against that the hardware firewall hasn't already covered?
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Nigel
Yes. IP and protocol specific. As long as the IP address matches and the
protocol requirements are the same, you should be good to go.
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
The only catch here is that the FW may refuse to recognize the new
server until you clear the ARP cache, or, alternatively, manually change
the MAC address to match the old one. Messing with the MAC address is
definitely not recommended in almost all situations, though.
From: David Lum
...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
The only catch here
not a problem since changes to FWs and routers are usually done
during maintenance windows. Either way clears the arp table.
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
Good catch, Kim. I don't
...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
We run into it here usually when replacing a router
Pretty much yes, firewalls base definition is around Layer 3, TCP/IP address
and/or port #s, and NOT FQDN or NetBIOS name, if that’s what you’re asking.
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: David Lum
, not a one time event ! '
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
The only catch here is that the FW may refuse to recognize the new server
until you clear the ARP cache, or, alternatively
Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
Pretty much
True, but I think I overlooked that because we use something else beside
our firewall to anchor those tunnels.
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
Yes, that will work, but keep
]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 7:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
Speaking of which - if the new server name is different or if you have static
entries for the server in DHCP (I don't know why you would, but I digress),
make sure you update those accordingly in DNS/WINS/DHCP
:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
Most of my servers have static entries in DHCP. The more
as it could be easily overlooked if one isn't
in the DHCP console often.
Dave
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 8:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Q
So you'll obviously need to update the MAC address in DHCP. Can't believe I
, 2011 8:02 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Firewall Q
So you’ll obviously need to update the MAC address in DHCP. Can’t believe I
thought of that AND that you are actually doing it. Wow. I should go play
the lottery. J
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology
I do...for 50% of them. We have situations where we are served better by
specific systems having DHCP reservations.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall Q
Meh. Just give your servers dynamically
situations where we are served better by
specific systems having DHCP reservations.
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, January 07, 2011 8:15 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Firewall Q
Meh. Just give your servers dynamically-allocated
Can't offer any advice on the Firebox, but a decent proxy should block
by category irrespective of Google caching. Ours certainly does (we use
a cloud service for web filtering).
a
From: Paul Everett [mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org]
Sent: 04 November
was thinking more along the lines of a real time gui vs logging.
*From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:43 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Firewall
We have fortinet firewalls with a fortianalyzer that I believe is capable
For some sites, they intentionally let Google index and cache part of the
site, and then via a robots file, stop them from doing it again - without
instructing google to also *flush* the cached content. This is also
accomplished with a mix of inappropriate sitemap use and what the website
allows
We have fortinet firewalls with a fortianalyzer that I believe is capable of
all that, but I am happy to say I am too damn busy to configure all that
logging, let alone monitor anyone on that level.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Paul Everett
evere...@leementalhealth.orgwrote:
I am looking
+1 for Fortinet
+10 for appropriate protection and restriction without detailed monitoring.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Brown 2jbr...@gmail.com wrote:
We have fortinet
Sounds like you want a Content filter.
We use Lightspeed's Total Traffic Control, and have been very impressed with
it. It's more education based, but it might fit your needs.
I have a college who uses a filter called an iBoss, and he is a fan of that as
well.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School
+1 Fortinet. Devices are robust and the subscriptions costs are reasonable.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Fortinet
+10 for appropriate protection and restriction without detailed monitoring.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile)
I was thinking more along the lines of a real time gui vs logging.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall
We have fortinet firewalls with a fortianalyzer that I believe is
capable of all
: Paul Everett
[mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tue, 02 Nov 2010
10:20:25 -0700
Subject: RE: Firewall
I was thinking more along the lines of a real time gui vs logging.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr
***
*IT Consultant*
*Systems, Networks, Security *
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
*From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, May 28, 2010 7:25 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Firewall recommendations
+1
They have
+1
They have a range of products that will handle both small and mid-sized
clients with ease.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
So easy. I have a 300A for HQ here and a number of 30 and 50 units for
smaller sites. You
Fortinet also has some very large clients from what I'm told. A number of
Universities use those products, at least my sales rep tells me so (and we all
believe everything our sales reps tell us, don't we)
Of course my last firewall was BorderManager before I moved us away from the
stone
. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 7:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall recommendations
+1
They have a range of products that will handle both small and mid-sized
clients with ease.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Thu, May 27, 2010
(download is something like
2Mbps, upload is paltry 512K or something). Their web server is in-house and
not hosted elsewhere.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall
Sonicwall TZ210
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.commailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain
confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended
recipient. If you are
: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall for small biz
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the PE840)
with a 5+yr
PFsense (FreeBSD based), I like it simple to use, and stable (use a
supermicro case 1u, with more then one ethernet jack), and 512mb of ram or
more and you should be fine.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum
+1 on Fortigate. I've got hundreds of these throughout the data centers...
Shook
From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall for small biz
I was going to suggest looking at Fortigate as well.
On Thu
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the PE840)
with a 5+yr old SonicWALL SOHO firewall and I believe it’s time to upgrade
them to something more current. They used to VPN but have found SBS remote
I would still look at the low end Cisco ASA 5505 and the Juniper SSG (
replaced the Netscreen 5GT )
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the
PE840) with a 5+yr old SonicWALL SOHO firewall and I
On 20 May 2010 at 10:43, David Lum wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the
PE840) with a 5+yr old SonicWALL SOHO firewall and I believe it´s time to
upgrade them to something more current. They used to VPN but have found SBS
remote access much faster.
Look at the Fortigate 50 firewall from Fortinet.
Lots of features in the price range you're looking for, and easy
configuration.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one
Sonicwall TZ-210/190 - easy to manage, fast and reliable. I have ten of
them all across Canada and they've been excellent.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:43 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have a 17-user client (one SBS server, same one discussed with the
PE840) with a 5+yr old
I was going to suggest looking at Fortigate as well.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at the Fortigate 50 firewall from Fortinet.
Lots of features in the price range you're looking for, and easy
configuration.
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
We are using an ASA appliance here and at one of our other locations. At the
third we still have a Pix. Mainly we needed to be able to have a VPN between
all three locations and allow users to VPN into our main location and since
we had the Pixes, we just upgraded the two locations to ASAs when
I use a Netscreen 25 and it has given me good reliable service. However
it is old and I'm looking myself. I've heard really good things about
Sidewinder that is now owned by McAfee.
Bill Lambert
Concuity
Phone 847-941-9206
The information contained in this e-mail message, including
Currently using a Sonicwall TZ210, will be upgrading to a UTM this month or
next, but very satisfied with its performance and support.
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.commailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any
I been using Netscreen/Juniper since 2000. No issues and bulletproof just
about.
From: Jonathan Kadoo [mailto:jka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Firewall recommendation
Hello everyone, I am looking for a recommendation. I am
No recommendation but why switch from what you know to something you don't
know?
Jon
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jacob ja...@excaliburfilms.com wrote:
I been using Netscreen/Juniper since 2000. No issues and bulletproof just
about.
*From:* Jonathan Kadoo [mailto:jka...@gmail.com]
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:28, Matt Plahtinsky cbusitl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was reading though Jonathan's Firewall Recommendation thread and it got
me thinking. I have a non profit client that their Firewall is on its way to
Firewall heaven (actually firewall hell but we will not go
We used to use Smoothwall for our smaller clients' firewalls. We would buy a
VERY low-end PC, put another NIC in it, then install Smoothwall and it worked
very well.
Jay Dale
I.T. Manager, 3GiG
Mobile: 713.299.2541
Email: jay.d...@3-gig.commailto:kandy.luk...@3-gig.com
Confidentiality Notice:
I've used IPcop with good success. Also since you mention they are a
non-profit, have you checked to see if they are eligible for Cisco
donations through techsoup. You can get an ASA 505 for something like
$150, and a 5510 for about $350 - depends on their annual budget and not
being a political
Or a school. I hate that techsoup restriction...
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Ralph Smith m...@gatewayindustries.org wrote:
I’ve used IPcop with good success. Also since you mention they are a
non-profit, have you checked to see if they are eligible for Cisco donations
through techsoup.
My current recommendation for Free/Cheap open source firewalls is Endian
Firewall (Community Edition) 2.3.
It's quite capable out of the box, and I won't list all the features here...
but I will link to their page:
http://www.endian.com/en/community/feature-comparison/
We used to use
Cool. Looks like I have a bunch of shinny new firewall toys to test out
this week.
Thanks guys.
Matt
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:
My current recommendation for Free/Cheap open source firewalls is Endian
Firewall (Community Edition) 2.3.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall Question (Different than Johnathan's question but
similar. Might help us both out. )
My current recommendation for Free
I forgot about schools. But I think the restrictions are set by the Cisco,
Microsoft etc., not techsoup.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall Question (Different than
...@gatewayindustries.org wrote:
I forgot about schools. But I think the restrictions are set by the Cisco,
Microsoft etc., not techsoup.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 3:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall
On 22 Mar 2010 at 14:53, Ralph Smith wrote:
I´ve used IPcop with good success. Also since you mention they are a
non-profit, have you checked to see if they are eligible for Cisco donations
through techsoup. You can get an ASA 505 for something like $150, and a 5510
for about $350 -
: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall Question (Different than Johnathan's question but
similar. Might help us both out. )
I think you're right. It's just frustrating b/c I support a
non-profit, secular, K
I would recommend a small Cisco ASA device. You might need to get someone to
set it up for you, but once it's set up, it's got a nice JAVA-based GUI for
management, and it's pretty intuitive.
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09,
, March 09, 2009 19:32
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
ok ... when I think FULL BLOWN ROUTER, I think Cisco with WIC
slots, etc
Cisco ASA would work well for you, as would Fortigate, Juniper
... a few
*E-mail . al...@gardnerweb.com
*URL http://Bullwinkle.GardnerWeb.Com/
-Original Message-
From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
+1
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
+1
***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(: 814.375.3073
*: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org
***
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold
Watchguard has some very nice field office type firewalls. Their Edge
products. Take a look at them, along with whatever you look at.
Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
You can give this a try - http://www.clarkconnect.com/info/ we have
this setup in two of our offices and will be setting up the Multi-WAN
this week.
---___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021Fax:
Just my .02 from my own experience - my client has 3 sites plus mine. I use the
Checkpoint Sofaware boxes - they were about $300 each back then. Probably
around $500 now plus some software costs and annual support about $100 I think.
They do VPN tunnels and VPN client - I run these to create the
try the FortiGate 100 A or the 200 A
Ed Flipsen
Manager
OnionLake Network Services
edw...@onionlake.ca
306 344 5283Network Services
306 344 5287Fax
780 847 2200Band Office
The views and opinions of this author are not to be misconstrued, used
I was looking at the 60B somebody else recommended. How does it
compare?
Thanks everyone,
Sam
From: Edward Flipsen [mailto:edw...@onionlake.ca]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
try
There are so many to choose from! Most anything that's stable will work for
what you're asking for. Even some consumer grade routers can do the VPN, but
those are usually underpowered.
What kind of VPN are you going to try to do? Clientless SSL Tunneling? IPSec?
OpenVPN?
I usually fall back
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall Recommendations
There are so many to choose from! Most anything that's stable will work
for what you're asking for. Even some consumer grade routers can do the
VPN, but those are usually underpowered.
What kind of VPN are you going to try to do
You're quite welcome.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Sam Cayze
[mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 09 Mar 2009
15:30:44 -0700
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
Thanks
How will you connect to the internet ? Will your ISP provide you with
ethernet ( or PPPoE ) or will you need a T1 WIC for T1/Frame Relay ?
When you say full blown Router you need to specify the type of WAN circuit
you'll be using to get accurate advice
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
via Ethernet drop. No DSu/CSU's or anything needed.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall Recommendations
How will you connect to the internet ? Will your ISP
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
