Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-08 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > A power user is an admin who hasn't bothered to make themselves an admin - > yet. MBS beat me to it. In particular, Power Users defeat most of the security defenses against even accidental malware infection. Anything that gets in can

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-08 Thread Jonathan Link
39 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. > > Actually to install FireFox, you just need to be a "power user." Full > Admin rights are _not_ required. Power User rights provide full control > over the Program Files folder, but

RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
A power user is an admin who hasn't bothered to make themselves an admin - yet. From: Stephen Wimberly [riverside...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. Actually to install Fi

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-08 Thread Stephen Wimberly
Actually to install FireFox, you just need to be a "power user." Full Admin rights are _not_ required. Power User rights provide full control over the Program Files folder, but not full rights to the System32 folder. Most of our users are power users, but VERY few are admins. To get the securit

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-07 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: > No, you have to be admin to update any program except Chrome, which installs > in > %APPDATA% and is completely writeable by the user who install it. And it doesn't even offer the *option* of installing somewhere else. Or at least it

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-07 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 5 Jul 2009 at 11:57, Stephen Wimberly wrote: > The NTT sounds great, but can a non-admin run it and upgrade any > update??? No, you have to be admin to update any program except Chrome, which installs in %APPDATA% and is completely writeable by the user who install it. Now if you had insta

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-05 Thread Stephen Wimberly
The NTT sounds great, but can a non-admin run it and upgrade any update??? On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: > On 1 Jul 2009 at 11:04, Sam Cayze wrote: > > > Force Firefox extensions to work in the latest version > > > > When Firefox updates to a new version, some exte

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-05 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 1 Jul 2009 at 11:04, Sam Cayze wrote: > Force Firefox extensions to work in the latest version > > When Firefox updates to a new version, some extensions are disabled. > However, you can easily edit the extensions to make Firefox re-enable them > -- no particular expertise required. Or you c

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-01 Thread Peter van Houten
dragging it onto a Firefox window. Complete the installation by restarting Firefox. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. I checked, and Rob

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-01 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
>> 3.5?  I had the latest and after updating to 3.5 didn't have to do >> anything with Roboform. >> >> BTW, have you played with the Roboform Online stuff yet?  I'm not sure >> I trust it enough to use it yet but man, that would be convenient for >> k

RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-01 Thread Sam Cayze
ailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. I checked, and Roboform told me I was on the latest version. I'm guessing that the latest version of Roboform != the latest Firefox extension... I upgra

RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-07-01 Thread Andy Ognenoff
convenient for keeping all my installs in sync! - Andy O. >-Original Message- >From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:16 AM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. > >3.5 upgrades

Re: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-06-30 Thread Stephen Wimberly
Well, I've started _testing_ the deployment, but I expect that we'll deploy in the coming weeks. My first three test deployments went without incident. ;) It's one of few applications that can upgrade silently while the customer is using the application! Makes my job easy! On Tue, Jun 30, 20

RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-06-30 Thread Ziots, Edward
Phone:401-639-3505 From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install. Thanks! (A little fast on the deployment, aren't we? :) I'm liking

RE: Firefox 3.5 Silent Install.

2009-06-30 Thread Sam Cayze
Thanks! (A little fast on the deployment, aren't we? :) I'm liking it so far. Most all my extensions worked too. From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:riverside...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Firefox 3.5