of evidence is not evidence of
> absence.." - which I *think* came from CSI
>
> Paul G.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 November 2009 19:18
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine
Or as I've often seen it put: "absence of evidence is not evidence of
absence.." - which I *think* came from CSI
Paul G.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 November 2009 19:18
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NewSID retired -
-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Bill Monicher [mailto:bmacd5...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
To make a long story short, we will now be forced to use sysprep, which is
To make a long story short, we will now be forced to use sysprep, which is
what Microsoft has wanted all along, which effectively renders any imaging
tool useless. The standard stuff about imaging part way through is only a
partial solution, and while it may apply to physical boxes, it will mean
t
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:03 AM, David Lum wrote:
> We had problems with GPO’s working unless NewSID was used.
Was the machine a domain member when you cloned it?
> Here's my understanding:
Here's mine... ;-)
> Each machine has its own SID
Correct. This is generated at install time, o
eration as
an option."
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker
wrote:
>
05, 2009 2:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
> I don't think that Mark was saying that the local machine SID doesn't
> matter ...
Not in those words, but I
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
> I don't think that Mark was saying that the local machine SID doesn't
> matter ...
Not in those words, but I can't see any other way to interpret
things. He said that there was no need to worry about it being
unique, and so NewSID is now
ssues
Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
Link to the tweet?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
bah. we know you re
Link to the tweet?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
bah. we know you read my tweet on it. :-)
From: Mike
bah. we know you read my tweet on it. :-)
From: Mike Gill [lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NewSID retired - The Machine SID Duplication Myth
http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
