Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
beefing up the testing regime. ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, 8 November 2012 5:22 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** FYI We approved two MS patches yesterday (KB2574819 KB2592687

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Ken Schaefer
cases for all your important apps as well. Cheers Ken From: Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2012 9:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Ken, That was my first question, but it is still unanswered. I am still new

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, 8 November 2012 9:48 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken, That was my first question, but it is still unanswered. I am still new at this %dayjob

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Kennedy, Jim
] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most. They were approved during the day for install overnight, a couple of users saw the pop-up and installed. SEP

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most. They were approved during the day for install overnight, a couple of users saw

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Rankin, James R
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* “SEP quarantined the files and then went to all machines on the network and quarantined them on all machines…” Holy smokes

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Erik Goldoff
the machines that had NOT been updated yet? ** ** So glad I don’t run AV. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Ziots, Edward
: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* That's way beyond an AV remit. If that happened on my watch I'd have a legal person on to Symantec. No way should AV decide to arbitrarily remove files on other systems. ---Blackberried

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Kelsey, John
Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Yep SEP sucks, and AV Sucks in general doesn’t matter if you are a Symantc, Mcafee, or Sophos shop. (Sure enough Travis Ormandy put out on Bugtraq information about multiple exploits to full compromise parts of the Sophos Application suite (AV

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Ziots, Edward
+ Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Ouch Sophos. We’ve had 1 conficker outbreak since moving to Sophos

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
don’t run AV. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Steven Peck
*Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most. They were approved during the day for install overnight, a couple of users saw the pop-up and installed. SEP quarantined the files and then went

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread James Rankin
. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Jonathan Link
08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most. They were approved during the day for install overnight, a couple of users saw the pop-up

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
? And quarantined the machines that had NOT been updated yet? ** ** So glad I don’t run AV. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Ziots, Edward
+1 on that... Z Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Rankin, James R
@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Do you have a suitable repalcement for PGP Whole Disk Encryption that includes centralized management and SSO capabilities? On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: No, the first rule of Symantec is you

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Jonathan Link
...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken These two updates were only installed on a couple of Win7 machines at most. They were approved during the day for install overnight

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Jonathan Link
*To: *NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *ReplyTo: * NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *Subject: *Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Do you have a suitable repalcement for PGP Whole Disk Encryption that includes centralized management and SSO

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Kurt Buff
that on it’s own? And quarantined the machines that had NOT been updated yet? ** ** So glad I don’t run AV. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Michael Leone
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote: Even if you don’t have a separate network, you can create a separate group in WSUS, and put a test machine(s) with your SOE image in that group. That's what we do. I have a group of machines that we use for development.

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread James Rankin
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com *Subject: *Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Do you have a suitable repalcement for PGP Whole Disk Encryption that includes centralized management and SSO capabilities? On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:32 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.comwrote: No, the first

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
? And quarantined the machines that had NOT been updated yet? ** ** So glad I don’t run AV. ** ** ** ** *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:45 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Ken

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Ken Schaefer
System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Yep, all on its own. Granted this was based on setting that were made during installation, based on recommendations from the onstie Symantec vendor/engineer. On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-08 Thread Robert Cato
:* Friday, 9 November 2012 12:57 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* ** ** Yep, all on its own. Granted this was based on setting that were made during installation, based on recommendations from the onstie Symantec vendor/engineer

Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-07 Thread Rankin, James R
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* FYI We approved two MS patches yesterday (KB2574819 KB2592687) in WSUS. One user installed the two updates in the afternoon and Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 with several advanced features enabled (threat protection

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-07 Thread Ziots, Edward
, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi...@lifespan.org From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 1:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Said it before and I will say it again...reactive AV

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
November 2012 5:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* FYI We approved two MS patches yesterday (KB2574819 KB2592687) in WSUS. One user installed the two updates in the afternoon and Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 with several advanced features enabled (threat

RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P*

2012-11-07 Thread rodtrent
At least with FEP you can minimize issues using it with a full endpoint management system. Sent from Windows Mail From: Ziots, Edward Sent: ‎November‎ ‎7‎, ‎2012 ‎9‎:‎24‎ ‎PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Symantec %@(*OI:TNGF(P* Yep SEP sucks, and AV Sucks in general doesn’t