I second Matti's comments about the validity of endorsing things we don't
implement.
Also, personally I really dislike the keys to castle spec, because I'm
generally against having yearly check in reviews and such.
--- Rohit
From: Sebastian Berg
Sent: Monday
Doesn't the project adopting wording of this kind "pass the buck" onto
the maintainers? At the end of the day, failure to enforce our stated
policy will be not only the responsibility of the authors but also the
reviewers / maintainers on whole. In effect (and just speaking
personally) wording
> Personally, I wouldn't (as a maintainer)...
Especially since I know that many potential contributors may not have
English as their first language so stunted language / odd patterns are
not **always** an AI indicator, sometimes its just inexperience.
-- Rohit
On 7/4/24 3:03 PM, Daniele Nico
Hello.
As part of the spring cleanup for NumPy 2.0 I'm soliciting opinions on the
removal of the numpy.f2py.compile() function (documented here
(https://link.getmailspring.com/link/937e4c5c-47d5-40d9-89bb-8fc04b19d...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fnumpy.org%2Fdoc%2Fstable%2Ff2py%2Fus
More of a workaround, since it seems like the wrappers and binding files are
generated could you try the `meson` build following this page in the
documentation?
https://numpy.org/devdocs/f2py/buildtools/meson.html
`distutils` support is patchy at best, but if the meson build doesn't work the
b
FWIW xtensor is supposed to be more of a drop in C++ replacement..
--- Rohit
From: Matthieu Brucher
Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2023 08:27
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy with eigen c++ binding
What would be the point? You woul
This is fantastic news!! Congratulations Mars (and Mukulika and Ross and
everyone else involved with the proposal), definitely well deserved.
--- Rohit
On Apr 28 2023, at 6:51 am, Benny Ifeanyi Iheagwara
wrote:
> That's awesome news Mars (@marsBarLee) You definitely earned it. Keep up the
> go
Please open an issue with the outputs. They should be working correctly. Newer
Fortran standard support is an ongoing process.
From: nbehrnd--- via NumPy-Discussion
Sent: Thursday, 13 April 2023 21:29
To: numpy-discussion@python.org
Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com
Subject:
I'm in favor of dropping Gitpod, IMO during sprints as well, it yielded less
utility than expected initially, and breaks far too often (as summarized
above). It would also be good to be free from docker rot given their recent
changes.
--- Rohit
On Mar 20 2023, at 9:09 pm, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
Last year we took with SciPy under the PSF with Ralf taking care of admin
duties. We had a great contributor (Namami [1]) and I think solid progress was
made for F2PY. SciPy is currently considering applying again this year [1],
with Hameer stepping up to take the administrative burden if there
Wonderful news! Very well deserved. Congratulations and welcome, Mukulika!
--- Rohit
On Jan 27 2023, at 1:20 pm, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:23 AM Matti Picus (mailto:matti.pi...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > The NumPy steering council recently granted maintainer rights to
>
NumPy as a sub-organization under the Python Software Foundation organization
will be mentoring a summer student this year funded by the Google Summer of
Code program. Ralf facilitated the application process and I will be the
primary mentor this year (with Gagandeep for support). Please look fo
rs. As always, everyone is welcome to come
discuss here: https://hackmd.io/oB_boakvRqKR-_2jRV-Qjg
On 23 May 2022, at 12:42, Ilhan Polat wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:00 PM Rohit Goswami
wrote:
The contents are nonresponsive. No tool can fix a native
responsiveness
issues. I am familiar with
it. It is less nice that we
assume that it must be niche and everyone would have the same energy
because HTML is theoretically more responsive, even though our docs are
not.
-- Rohit
On 23 May 2022, at 11:08, Ilhan Polat wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rohit Goswami
wrote:
I a
as I
know.
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 8:34 AM Ralf Gommers
wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 6:51 AM Matti Picus
wrote:
On 23/5/22 01:51, Rohit Goswami wrote:
Being very hard to read should not be reason enough to stop
generating
them. In places with little to no internet connectivity oft
/notebooks/tutorials), I think we should try to keep all users in
mind and PDF generation is hardly on its way out in any language /
library.
--- Rohit
On 22 May 2022, at 23:28, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 3:52 PM Rohit Goswami
wrote:
Being very hard to read should not be r
Being very hard to read should not be reason enough to stop generating
them. In places with little to no internet connectivity often the PDF
documentation is invaluable.
I personally use the PDF documentation both on my phone and e-reader
when I travel simply because it is more accessible and
Agreed, however, the[ NumPy learn section of the official
documentation](https://numpy.org/learn/) is probably a better place to
point to (though your article is justifiably also linked from there).
---
Rohit
On 27 Jan 2022, at 16:15, Lev Maximov wrote:
Hi,
I believe this question fits Stac
This seems fun. I should have some time for a few weeks after the 20th (Uni
vacation) if no one else takes it up by then.
—
Rohit
On 8 Dec 2021, at 15:55, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is anyone interested in digging into speeding up __array_function__? I
> distracted myself briefly looki
It works if the entire link is copied into the browser.
—
Rohit
On 11 Oct 2021, at 19:07, Rumanu Bhardwaj wrote:
> I'm not able to join without the meeting password ;-;
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct, 2021, 4:46 am Melissa Mendonça, wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Our next Documentation Team meeting will be on *Mo
on-emails-for-discussions/
>>
>> is a recent feature. I don't work for GitHub obviously and have nothing to
>> do with them but the reasons I'm willing to hear about.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:07 PM Matthew Bret
I guess then the approach overall would evolve to something like using the
mailing list to announce discourse posts which need input. Though I would
assume that the web interface essentially makes the mailing list almost like
discourse, even for new users.
The real issue IMO is still the modera
To add to that, while it is redundant to maintain both a mailing list and a
discourse, the latter requires significantly more moderation and policy (eg.
What happens if users delete posts / accounts).
It is a non trivial amount of work which I think should not be underestimated.
A lot of other
Although it is true that discourse is easier for newcomers in a lot of ways, it
is far worse for governance and consensus. The mailing list, by having
essentially sequential topics sent out to all subscribers is easier to keep
track of than a large number of forum topics.
___
24 matches
Mail list logo
