This is awesome!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:27 AM, klo uo klo...@gmail.com wrote:
I was reading mayavi documentation and one of the examples
(tvtk.ImageData) resembled Numpy logo grid.
I added barchart and tweaked a bit colormap and thought to post it for fun:
Heh, thanks :)
It's free interpretation made from quick idea then immediately shared.
Original logo can be made exact I guess with interlaced planes and
shallower bars or similar...
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
This is awesome!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
I made a branch called with_maskna and then merged Nathaniel's PR which
removes the mask_na support from master. I then applied a patch to fix the
boolean indexing problem reported by Ralf.
I then
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think about the implications of our changes on existing users. and
also that little changes
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think
On 06/26/2012 11:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 11:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at
It would be really awesome to have a script like this to generate the logo.
That's pretty amazing. Would you be able to tweak it up a bit and then we
could take a poll here? Perhaps we change the logo to a variation of what
your script produces.
Can you export a PNG?
-Travis
On Jun
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012
On 06/26/2012 04:08 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
(I have not read the whole cython discussion yet)
So here's the summary. It's rather complicated but also incredibly neat
:-) And technical details can be hidden behind a tight API.
Could you provide a bit more context for this list. I think this is an
important technology concept.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to get a
1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release out by SciPy
(or even an rc1 release). But, given the number of code changes and
differences between 1.5.x and 1.7, I think we will
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to include
the Datetime work in the release against David's own best judgement. The
result was a delay of several months until Ralf could get up to speed and
get 1.4.1 out. Let us also note that poly1d is actually not the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Calling this and that 'gratuitous' is already damaging to the community.
Them's fightin' words. If you didn't want a fight you could have simply
pointed out a path forward.
I disagree. If a change is
On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Calling this and that 'gratuitous' is already damaging to the community.
Them's fightin' words. If you didn't want a fight you could have simply
pointed
Hello,
If you increment an array using advanced indexing and have repeated
indexes, the array doesn't get repeatedly incremented,
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/50291. I wrote
a C function that does incrementing with repeated indexes correctly. The
branch is here
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best judgement.
The result was a delay of several months until Ralf could get up to speed
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best
I think Chuck alludes to the fact that I was rather reserved about
merging datetime before *anyone* knew about breaking the ABI. I don't
feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
more strongly about datetime being included), but I am also not
interested in making a
On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, John Salvatier wrote:
Hello,
If you increment an array using advanced indexing and have repeated indexes,
the array doesn't get repeatedly incremented,
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/50291. I wrote a
C function that does
Or, we could raise funds for NumFOCUS by selling tickets for a brawl between
the two at SciPy2012...
I kid, I kid!
Thanks for the humor. Unfortunately, I would be no match physically with
someone used to the cold of Logan :-)
-Travis
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:48 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best
Can you clarify why it would be super hard? I just reused the code for
advanced indexing (a modification of PyArray_SetMap). Am I missing
something crucial?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, John Salvatier wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I think he was referring that making NUMPY_ARRAY_OBJECT[...] syntax
support the operation that you said is hard. But having a separate
function do it is less complicated as you said.
Fred
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:27 PM, John Salvatier
jsalv...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Can you clarify why
Right, that makes sense. Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
I think he was referring that making NUMPY_ARRAY_OBJECT[...] syntax
support the operation that you said is hard. But having a separate
function do it is less complicated as you
Hi All,
my question might have got lost due to the intense activity around
the 1.7 release. Now that it has quietened down, would appreciate any
help regarding my confusion about how index arrays work
(especially when broadcasted).
-- srean
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, srean
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to
get a 1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release
out by SciPy (or even an rc1 release). But, given the
On Jun 26, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
Hi,
I think he was referring that making NUMPY_ARRAY_OBJECT[...] syntax
support the operation that you said is hard. But having a separate
function do it is less complicated as you said.
Yes. That's precisely what I meant. Thank you
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to get
a 1.7 release out before SciPy. I would like to get a beta release
I think we need to update this document:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ApiDeprecation
I don't think this characterizes the opinion of all involved in NumPy
development (it is certainly not the way I view our commitment to users).
Incidentally, in the migration from Trac we should
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
After some more investigation, I'm not optimistic that we will be able to
get
Exactly.
I don't
feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
more strongly about datetime being included),
I think you left out a 'not'. I don't mean to imply that you were in anyway
the blame. And you have been pretty adamant about not allowing late merges of
On 6/26/12 2:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with
code that was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have
not moved forward to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice.
I'll bite. Here's an issue that prevents
On 06/26/2012 09:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Exactly.
I don't
feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
more strongly about datetime being included),
I think you left out a 'not'. I don't mean to imply that you were in
anyway the blame. And you have
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Exactly.
I don't
feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed
more strongly about datetime being included),
I think you left out a 'not'. I don't mean to imply that you were in
anyway the
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with code that
was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have not moved forward
to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people did move already. And I haven't
seen reports of those that tried
On 6/26/12 3:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Something the Sage project does very well is meeting often in person
Another thing we have that has improved the mailing list climate is a
sage-flame list [1] that serves as a venting release valve for anyone
to post *anything* at all. There
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 6/26/12 3:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Something the Sage project does very well is meeting often in person
Another thing we have that has improved the mailing list climate is a
sage-flame list [1]
+1 !
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Unfortunately, I think there are issues we are just now seeing with code
that was released in 1.6.x, and there are many people who have not moved
forward to 1.6.x yet.
Some examples would be nice. A lot of people
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 6/26/12 3:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Something the Sage project does very well is meeting often in person
Another thing we have that has
On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
(I have not read the whole cython discussion yet)
So here's the summary. It's rather complicated but also incredibly neat
:-) And technical details can be hidden behind a tight API.
Could you provide a bit more context for this list. I
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 !
Speaking as someone trying to get started in contributing to numpy, I
find this discussion extremely off-putting. It's childish,
meaningless, and spiteful, and I think it's doing more harm than any
possible
On 6/26/12 3:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Thank you for the reminder. I was already called out for not stopping.
Thanks, Dag. A flame-list might indeed be a good idea at this point if
there is further need for clearing the air
Also, having it set up before it is needed is part of
On 06/26/2012 10:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
(I have not read the whole cython discussion yet)
So here's the summary. It's rather complicated but also incredibly neat
:-) And technical details can be hidden behind a tight API.
Could you
On 26 June 2012 22:39, John Hunter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 !
Speaking as someone trying to get started in contributing to numpy, I
find this discussion extremely off-putting. It's childish,
meaningless, and spiteful, and I think
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I think we need to update this document:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ApiDeprecation
Sounds fine to me to make the period for removal longer, or even to by
default aim to not remove deprecated API's at all in
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM,
I want to support multiple types in the index_increment function that I've
written here:
https://github.com/jsalvatier/numpy/blob/master/numpy/core/src/multiarray/mapping.c
I need to check that the first argument's type can support addition, cast
the dataptr to the appropriate type and do the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com javascript:; wrote:
On 6/26/12 3:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Something the Sage project does very well is meeting often in person
Another thing we have
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to be
addressed as well. We'll have to decide on a case-by-case basis if
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
One issues is the one that Sage identified about the array interface
regression as noted by Jason. Any other regressions from 1.5.x need to
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/ipython/
http://travis-ci.org/#!/ipython/ipython
The SP setup is more complete, including Mac
| From: Rebekah Pratt
| Date: Jun 25 23:59:59 2012 -0400
|
| Hey, greetings from orlando! How has re entry to texas been? Our
| holiday is going well, although a little fast. The whole disney
| experience is cooler than I was expecting. We are all a bit tired
| out though, and adah moody
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/ipython/
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC (courtesy of our friends at NeuroDebian)
http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC
In my enthusiasm of finding someone to help with the release of NumPy 1.7 and
my desire to get something released by the SciPy conference, I was hasty and
didn't gather enough feedback from others about the release of NumPy 1.7. I'm
sorry about that.
I would like to get NumPy 1.7 out the
Travis, apologies in advance if the tone of this message is too strong -
please take it as a sign of how frustrating I find the discussion on this
point.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
...
What should have happened in this case, in my mind, is that
71 matches
Mail list logo
