Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río > wrote: [...] >> >> Are you trying to prove the point that consensus doesn't work by making it >> impossible to reach a consensus on this? ;-) >> > > Forgive me if I use thi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:47 AM, wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:04 AM, wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Matthew Brett >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Eric Firing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:04 AM, wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Eric Firing > wrote: > >> > On 2015/09/04 10:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 12:04 AM, wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> > On 2015/09/04 10:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > On 2015/09/04 10:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker > w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

Hi, On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 2015/09/04 10:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote: 1) I very much agree that governance can make or break a pr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On 2015/09/04 10:53 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >>> 1) I very much agree that governance can make or break a project. However, >>> the actual governance approach often ends up maki

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comments on governance proposal (was: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> 1) I very much agree that governance can make or break a project. However, >> the actual governance approach often ends up making less difference than the >> people involved. >> >

[Numpy-discussion] meshgrid dtype casting

I'm trying to build a meshgrid with small nonnegative integers default is int32 >>> np.meshgrid([0,1,2], [0,1])[0].dtype dtype('int32') If I use uint, then the arrays are upcast to int64 - Why? >>> np.meshgrid(np.array([0,1,2], np.uint), np.array([0,1], np.uint))[0].dtype dtype('int64') broad