Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I see that sympy, for example, has only one mailing list, and that
works extremely well. I'd be interested to hear from the Cython
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:06 PM, srean srean.l...@gmail.com wrote:
And I continue to think it sends the wrong message.
Maybe if you articulate your fears I will be able to appreciate your
point of view more.
Ah - I'm afraid I don't know how to say what I mean more clearly :(
I can
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fernando - you told me a week or so ago that you'd come across a blog
post or similar advocating a single list - do you remember
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, srean srean.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I like this solution and I think ask.scipy.org can be revived to take
over that role, but this will need some policing to send standard
questions there and also some hangout time at ask.scipy.org.
Sounds like a good idea
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you use anything else besides Travis CI?
Yes, we use both Shining Panda and Travis CI:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/ipython/
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
For the main repos we use buildbot and test on:
Ubuntu Maverick 32-bit
Debian sid 64-bit
OSX 10.4 PPC
OSX 10.5 Intel
Debian wheezy PPC
Debian squeeze ARM (a Raspberry PI no less)
WIndows XP 32 bit
SPARC
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that numpy.linalg.matrix_rank
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Brett
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that numpy.linalg.matrix_rank sometimes gives full rank for
matrices that are numerically rank deficient
Hi,
I noticed that numpy.linalg.matrix_rank sometimes gives full rank for
matrices that are numerically rank deficient:
If I repeatedly make random matrices, then set the first column to be
equal to the sum of the second and third columns:
def make_deficient():
X = np.random.normal(size=(40,
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building such a
thing. We would like it to be open source. We are currently preparing a
proposal to DARPA as part of their XDATA proposal in order
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
The third proposal is certainly the best one from Cython's perspective;
and I imagine for those writing C extensions against
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/09/2012 06:46 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
Nathaniel and Mark have worked very hard on a joint document to try and
explain the current status of the missing-data debate. I think they've
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI
service,
please speak up and let
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Chris Ball ceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Pauli Virtanen pav at iki.fi writes:
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux is Linus' private tree. Everything that goes in is his decision,
everything that stays out is his decision. Of course, he
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Given the amount of new stuff coming in 1.7 and the slip in it's schedule, I
wonder if it would be worth putting out a 1.6.2 release with fixes for
einsum, ticket 1578, perhaps some others. My
Hi,
I just wanted to point out a situation where the scalar casting rules
can be a little confusing:
In [113]: a - np.int16(128)
Out[113]: array([-256, -1], dtype=int16)
In [114]: a + np.int16(-128)
Out[114]: array([ 0, -1], dtype=int8)
This is predictable from the nice docs here:
Oops, sorry, Keith Goodman kindly pointed out that I had missed out:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to point out a situation where the scalar casting rules
can be a little confusing:
In [110]: a = np.array([-128, 127], dtype
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Mark and I will have conversations about NumPy while he
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad to hear that discussion is happening, but please do have it
on list. If it's off list it easy for people to feel
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Right - but that would be an absurd overstatement of what I said.
There's no point in addressing something I didn't say and no sensible
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I have heard from a few people that they are not excited by the growth of
the NumPy data-structure by the 3 pointers needed to hold the masked-array
storage. This is especially true when there is talk to
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I have heard from a few people that they are not excited by the growth of
the NumPy data-structure by the 3 pointers needed
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 16, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I have heard from a few people that they are not excited by the growth
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I think the answer to this is yes, but it could be as a feature-filled
sub-class (like the current numpy.ma, except in C).
I'd love to hear that argument fleshed out in more detail - do you have time?
My
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Tony Yu tsy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Friday, April 6, 2012, Val Kalatsky wrote:
The only slicing short-cut I can think of is the Ellipsis object, but
it's not going to help you much
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM, cgraves christoph.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that the speed of append_fields() in numpy.lib.recfunctions is much
slower than rec_append_fields() in matplotlib.mlab. See the following code:
As I remember it (Pierre M can probably correct me) the
Hi,
2012/4/2 Hongbin Zhang hongbin_zhan...@hotmail.com:
Dear Python-users,
I am currently very confused about the Scipy routine to obtain the
eigenvectors of a complex matrix.
In attached you find two files to diagonalize a 2X2 complex Hermitian
matrix, however, on my computer,
If I run
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
Both results are correct.
There are 2 factors that make the results look different:
1) The order: the 2nd eigenvector of the numpy solution corresponds to the
1st eigenvector of your solution,
note that the vectors
Hi,
As of commit 72c6fbd, I am getting the appended build error on OSX
10.6.8. I couldn't immediately see what might have caused the
problem.
Cheers,
Matthew
...
creating build/temp.macosx-10.3-fat-2.6/numpy/core/blasdot
compile options: '-DNO_ATLAS_INFO=3 -Inumpy/core/blasdot
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
As of commit 72c6fbd, I am getting the appended build error on OSX
10.6.8. I couldn't immediately see what might have
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:36 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
I just did a quick test across all supported EPD platforms:
win-64: float96 No, float128 No
win-32: float96 No, float128 No
osx-64: float96 No,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a casting change running the test suite on our image reader,
nibabel:
https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/blob
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits? If so, is it useful? Has anyone got a windows64
box to check float128 ?
Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits?
Yes
If so, is it useful?
Yes
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I just happened to have an xp64 VM running:
My version of numpy (1.6.1) does not have float128 (see more below what I
get in ipython session).
If you need to test something else please let me know.
Thanks a lot -
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Val Kalatsky kalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I does look like a joke.
Here is print np.finfo(np.longdouble)
In [2]: np.__version__
Out[2]: '1.6.1'
In [3]: np.flo
np.float np.float32 np.float_ np.floor
np.float16 np.float64
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
I'm seeing the same thing on both (64 and 32-bit) Windows
EPD test machines. I guess Windows does not support 128
bit floats.
Do you mean there is no float96 on windows 32 bit as I described at
the beginning of
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Ilan Schnell ischn...@enthought.com wrote:
To be more precise. On both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows
machines I don't see.float96 as well as np.float128
Do you have any idea why I am seeing float96 and you are not? I'm on
XP with the current sourceforge
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a casting change running the test suite on our image reader,
nibabel:
https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/tests/test_casting.py
For this script:
pre
import numpy as np
Adata
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found this test caused a bus error on current trunk:
pre
import numpy as np
from StringIO import StringIO as BytesIO
from numpy.testing import assert_array_equal
def test_2d_buf():
dtt
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Pierre Haessig
Hi,
I noticed a casting change running the test suite on our image reader,
nibabel:
https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/tests/test_casting.py
For this script:
pre
import numpy as np
Adata = np.zeros((2,), dtype=np.uint8)
Bdata = np.zeros((2,), dtype=np.int16)
Bzero =
Hi,
I found this test caused a bus error on current trunk:
pre
import numpy as np
from StringIO import StringIO as BytesIO
from numpy.testing import assert_array_equal
def test_2d_buf():
dtt = np.complex64
arr = np.arange(10, dtype=dtt)
# 2D array
arr2 = np.reshape(arr, (2,
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
$ export NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION=1
Thanks, that did it:
9194b3af704df71aa9b1ff2f53f169848d0f9dc7 is the first bad commit
Let me
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
$ export NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION=1
Thanks
And simplifying:
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: control = np.array([(1, 2, 3), (0, 5, 6)], dtype=[('f0',
bool), ('f1', bool), ('f2', int)])
In [3]: control == control
Out[3]: array([ True, True], dtype=bool)
In [4]: from numpy import ma
In [5]: control = ma.array([(1, 2, 3), (0, 5, 6)],
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've pushed a bugfix to github, can you confirm that the crash goes away on
your test box? Thanks for tracking that down, the stack trace was very
helpful. Since x86 machines don't have as strict alignment requirements,
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Sorry that this report
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Charles R
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br
Hi,
Sorry that this report is not complete, I don't have full access to
this box but, on a Debian squeeze machine running linux
2.6.32-5-sparc64-smp:
nosetests
~/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/numpy/lib/tests/test_io.py:TestFromTxt.test_user_missing_values
test_user_missing_values
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Sorry that this report is not complete, I don't have full access to
this box but, on a Debian squeeze machine running
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jonathan Rocher jroc...@enthought.com wrote:
Thanks to your question, I discovered that there is a float128 dtype in
numpy
In[5]: np.__version__
Out[5]: '1.6.1'
In[6]: np.float128?
Type: type
Base Class: type 'type'
String Form:type
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
We already use the NEP process for such decisions. This discussion came
from simply from the *idea* of writing such a NEP.
Nothing has been decided. Only opinions have been shared that might
influence the
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/27/2012 2:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
ISO specifies comma to be used in international standards
(ISO/IEC Directives, part 2 / 6.6.8.1):
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
27.02.2012 20:43, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
On 2/27/2012 2:28 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
ISO specifies comma to be used in international standards
(ISO/IEC Directives, part 2 / 6.6.8.1):
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.io
wrote:
Exactly. I'd update this to
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Le 23/02/2012 17:28, Charles R Harris a écrit :
That's correct. They are both extended precision (80 bits), but
aligned on 32bit/64bit boundaries respectively. Sun provides a true
quad precision, also called
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Le 23/02/2012 17:28, Charles R Harris a écrit
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Le 23/02/2012 20:08, Mark Wiebe a écrit :
+1, I think it's good for its name to correspond to the name in C/C++,
so that when people search for information on it they will find the
relevant information more
Hi,
I was gaily using np.longlong for casting to the highest available
float type when I noticed this:
In [4]: np.array([2.1], dtype=np.longlong)
Out[4]: array([2], dtype=int64)
whereas:
In [5]: np.array([2.1], dtype=np.float128)
Out[5]: array([ 2.1], dtype=float128)
This on OSX snow leopard
2012/2/22 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
In [4]: np.array([2.1], dtype=np.longlong)
Out[4]: array([2], dtype=int64)
Maybe just a typo:
In [3]: np.array([2.1], dtype=np.longfloat)
Out[3]: array([ 2.1
Hi,
Thanks for this - it's very helpful.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The suggestion of transitioning the NumPy core code from C to C++ has
sparked a vigorous debate, and I thought I'd start a new thread to give my
perspective on some of the issues
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for this - it's very helpful.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The suggestion
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
19.02.2012 05:38, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that.
First, there wasn't a Cython-refactor of NumPy. There was a
Cython-refactor of SciPy. I'm not sure of
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 02/18/2012 08:52 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Sturla Molden wrote:
Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 17:12 skrev Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com
javascript:;:
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:30 PM
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:31 PM
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12
Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Christopher Jordan
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The C/C++ discussion is just getting started. Everyone should keep in mind
that this is not something that is going to happening quickly. This will
be a point of discussion throughout the year. I'm not a huge
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 21:51, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, David Cournapeau
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 22:06, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 21:51, Matthew Brett matthew.br
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 22:29, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 22:06, Matthew Brett matthew.br
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The C/C++ discussion is just getting started. Everyone should keep in mind
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
We will need to see examples of what Mark is talking about and clarify
some
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Sure. This list actually deserves a long writeup about that. First,
there wasn't a Cython-refactor of NumPy. There was a
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2012, John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2/16/2012 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
This has not been an encouraging
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over c for high
performance libraries. I am not convinced by the number of
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44
501 - 600 of 1028 matches
Mail list logo
