Hi Sturla,
Quoting Sturla Molden :
> Den 10.03.2012 22:56, skrev Sturla Molden:
>>
>> I am not sure why NumPy uses f2c'd routines instead of a dependency
>> on BLAS and LAPACK like SciPy.
>
> Actually, np.dot does depend on the CBLAS interface to BLAS (_dotblas.c).
>
> But the lapack methods in
10.03.2012 23:19, Sturla Molden kirjoitti:
[clip]
> If the intention is to avoid Fortran dependency in NumPy, I am not sure
> why this is better than a dependency on CBLAS and LAPACKE.
The CBLAS parts aren't compiled if the library is not available --- in
that case Numpy just falls back to a total
Den 10.03.2012 22:56, skrev Sturla Molden:
I am not sure why NumPy uses f2c'd routines instead of a dependency on
BLAS and LAPACK like SciPy.
Actually, np.dot does depend on the CBLAS interface to BLAS (_dotblas.c).
But the lapack methods in lapack_lite seems to use f2c'd code. I am not
sur
Den 07.03.2012 21:02, skrev "V. Armando Solé":
I had already used the information Robert Kern provided on the 2009
thread and obtained the PyCObject as:
from scipy.linalg.blas import fblas
dgemm = fblas.dgemm._cpointer
sgemm = fblas.sgemm._cpointer
but I did not find a way to obtain those po
Den 07.03.2012 21:02, skrev "V. Armando Solé":
I had already used the information Robert Kern provided on the 2009
thread and obtained the PyCObject as:
from scipy.linalg.blas import fblas
dgemm = fblas.dgemm._cpointer
sgemm = fblas.sgemm._cpointer
but I did not find a way to obtain those po
On 06/03/2012 20:57, Sturla Molden wrote:
On 05.03.2012 14:26, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
In 2009 there was a thread in this mailing list concerning the access to
BLAS from C extension modules.
If I have properly understood the thread:
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2009-Novem
On 06.03.2012 21:33, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Of course it does make his life easier. This way he does not have to
> distribute his own BLAS/LAPACK/etc...
>
> Please stop presenting as truth things which are at best highly
> opiniated. You already made such statements many times, and it is not
>
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 05.03.2012 14:26, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>
>> In 2009 there was a thread in this mailing list concerning the access to
>> BLAS from C extension modules.
>>
>> If I have properly understood the thread:
>>
>> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail
On 05.03.2012 14:26, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
> In 2009 there was a thread in this mailing list concerning the access to
> BLAS from C extension modules.
>
> If I have properly understood the thread:
>
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2009-November/046567.html
>
> the answer by t
Hello,
In 2009 there was a thread in this mailing list concerning the access to
BLAS from C extension modules.
If I have properly understood the thread:
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2009-November/046567.html
the answer by then was that those functions were not exposed (only
10 matches
Mail list logo
