On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
>>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
> >> note
> >> to repeat testing if the test fails.
> >
> > I don't like
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
>
>> OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
>> note
>> to repeat testing if the test fails.
>
> I don't like this. I think the prngs should use fixed seeds known to pa
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
>
> > OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
> > note
> > to repeat testing if the test fails.
>
> I don't like this. I think the prngs should use fixed seeds known
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
> OK. One more question: how often do the tests fail? I want to include a
> note
> to repeat testing if the test fails.
I don't like this. I think the prngs should use fixed seeds known to pass
the test. Depending on confidence intervals in the units tes
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Josef,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> {{{
>> >> import numpy as np
>> >>
>>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > Hi Josef,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> {{{
> >> import numpy as np
> >>
> >> assert np.all(np.random.hypergeometric(3,18,11,size=10) < 4)
> >> assert n
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, wrote:
>
>
>>
>> {{{
>> import numpy as np
>>
>> assert np.all(np.random.hypergeometric(3,18,11,size=10) < 4)
>> assert np.all(np.random.hypergeometric(18,3,11,size=10) > 0)
>>
>> pr = 0.8
Hi Josef,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, wrote:
> {{{
> import numpy as np
>
> assert np.all(np.random.hypergeometric(3,18,11,size=10) < 4)
> assert np.all(np.random.hypergeometric(18,3,11,size=10) > 0)
>
> pr = 0.8
> N = 10
> rvsn = np.random.logseries(pr,size=N)
> # these two frequenc
> Can you open a ticket for this?
Done. Ticket #1053
Surla
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Charles R Harris
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The fixes look small and I'd like them to go in. Can you put together
> some
> >> short tests for these fixes? Wou
Hi Sturla,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> >
> > Will memmap be fixed to use offsets correctly before 1.3?
>
> I posted this to scipy-dev (possibly wrong list) on March 9, so I'll
> repeat it here: In Python 2.6, mmap has a offset keyword. NumPy's memmap
> should use thi
>
> Will memmap be fixed to use offsets correctly before 1.3?
I posted this to scipy-dev (possibly wrong list) on March 9, so I'll
repeat it here: In Python 2.6, mmap has a offset keyword. NumPy's memmap
should use this to allow big files to be memory mapped on 32 bit systems.
Only a minor change
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The fixes look small and I'd like them to go in. Can you put together some
>> short tests for these fixes? Would it help if you had commit privileges in
>> Numpy?
>
> Yes,
Will memmap be fixed to use offsets correctly before 1.3?
> hi,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that I will close the trunk for 1.3.0 at the
> end of 15th March (I will more likely do it at the end of Monday Japan
> time which roughly corresponds to 15th March midnight Pacific time),
>
> cheers,
>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
> >
> > The fixes look small and I'd like them to go in. Can you put together
> some
> > short tests for these fixes? Would it help if you had commit privileges
> in
> > Numpy?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> The fixes look small and I'd like them to go in. Can you put together some
> short tests for these fixes? Would it help if you had commit privileges in
> Numpy?
Yes, I was about to suggest giving Josef commit access to numpy, I
unfortu
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:57 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > Just a friendly reminder that I will close the trunk for 1.3.0 at the
> > end of 15th March (I will more likely do it at the end of Monday Japan
> > time which roughly correspon
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> hi,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that I will close the trunk for 1.3.0 at the
> end of 15th March (I will more likely do it at the end of Monday Japan
> time which roughly corresponds to 15th March midnight Pacific time),
>
> cheers,
>
>
hi,
Just a friendly reminder that I will close the trunk for 1.3.0 at the
end of 15th March (I will more likely do it at the end of Monday Japan
time which roughly corresponds to 15th March midnight Pacific time),
cheers,
David
___
Numpy-discussion mai
20 matches
Mail list logo
