could be to
make it hidden to the eventType user.
For example you could hide the lookup in the method getEvents of the class
EventType
Regards
Alessandro
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Abid Hussain [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello everybody,
I except not to be the first one to ask this question
findAll() (see below) is something like SELECT
* FROM tablename. I thought, in this case no proxies are used???
Regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
Hi everybody,
I have written a storeAll()-method in a dao to store all given objects
in one transaction (you find the code at the end
. ShoppingCart.getArticles() - see
below)...
Regards,
Abid
Armin Waibel schrieb:
Hi Abid,
Abid Hussain wrote:
Hi again,
I think this issue has to something with the materialization of
objects (when using proxies). But I thought that proxies are only
used, when retrieving a corresponding
column=Rolle jdbc-type=VARCHAR /
/class-descriptor
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Armin,
thanks for help.
I guess, you don't mean 1.0.5 by next major version, maybe 1.1? Is there
already a date for the release of the next major version available?
Best regards,
Abid
Armin Waibel schrieb:
Hi Abid,
Abid Hussain wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've a table with quite a lot
?
Regards,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for this project? Is work currently being done? Why such a big gap in
releases? Are there still plans to ship 1.1?
Regards,
-Sergey
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
)
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Hi Abid,
It was me who posted that question. I also posted an improvement
request into Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-104
There is a workaround in there. Have a look.
Regards,
Vasily
On 10/23/06, Abid Hussain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
the following problem
problem and am asking if there is a solution maybe in
ojb 1.0.5?
Regards,
Abid Hussain
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
.
Anybody got an idea?
Regards,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
()-method.
It seems that the broker has nothing to store in the method without the
logging-statement seen below.
But is there any other way to solve this problem?
Regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
Hi everybody,
I want to implement a method which stores not only one object but a
collection
the logging-statement seen below.
But is there any other way to solve this problem?
Regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
Hi everybody,
I want to implement a method which stores not only one object but a
collection of objects.
I tried this one:
public void storeAll(Collection valueObjects
. Are there any updates planned in the close future?
2.
Is there any reliable figures about how many people use OJB?
I'm just asking because when I talk to other developers about
O/R-Mapping they mostly only know Hibernate and I wonder how OJB's
standing is upon developers.
Regards,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
).
How can this happen?
Did I make a mistake or is it a bug?
Would be great if somebody could help me about this.
Best regards,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Sorry, my fault. Seems to be that it value of CRITERIA_SELECT_ALL should
be null.
Best regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
Hi everybody,
I have a problem which I really can't figure out.
Please look at following code:
...
crit = QueryByCriteria.CRITERIA_SELECT_ALL;
logger.debug(#2 Criteria
wrong, I think OJB is a great tool, and it helps me a lot.
But wouldn't it be great having a method/class which combines the
simplicity of QueryByCriteria and the flexibility of ReportQuery?
Best regards,
Abid
Jakob Braeuchi schrieb:
hi abid,
what about using distinct ?
jakob
Abid Hussain
?
Best regards,
Abid Hussain
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
above.
Maybe there is another way to fix this problem?
Best regards,
Abid Hussain
Carlos Chávez schrieb:
Abid Hussain escribió:
Hallo everybody,
for the following problem I didn't find a proper solution:
I'm using the ReportQuery to retrieve data, because the table has
about 25 columns and i
i overlooked something?
Thanks for help,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I think it was my fault.
when i replace the Line
-- crit.addNotEqualToColumn(name, excludeModules[i]);
to
-- crit.addNotEqualTo(name, excludeModules[i]);
everthing works.
Sorry for making trouble.
Best regards,
Abid
Abid Hussain schrieb:
Hi everybody,
while executing a query
Hi Armin,
For this special case you have to delete the old value/obj and then
insert the new vale/obj.
regards,
Armin
thanks a lot. I thought of this possibility, but wondered if there is
another way to perform the update.
Regards,
Abid
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web
,
Abid Hussain
--
Abid Hussain
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.abid76.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everybody,
I'm quite a newbie in OJB, so maybe I have overlooked something.
In most cases I don't need all colums of a table when I do a query. So,
how do I tell OJB not to retrieve all 25 (e.g.) columns of a table but
only the ones I need?
Best regards,
Abid Hussain
--
Abid Hussain
24 matches
Mail list logo
