E) ; Alla
Goldner ; Gadiyar, Rajesh ;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P ;
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Hello All:
I appreciate everyone's thoughtful discussion on the topic.
This may be anec
t; alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; Gadiyar, Rajesh ;
> Phil Robb
> *Cc:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P <
> onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
> Representative to the LFN TAC
>
>
>
> Thanks
:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> P
mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>;
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the
; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Thanks Mazin. Appreciated. IMHO it would be great if the TAC representative
would also be part of the TSC.
Would it make sense to reassess the TAC representation post the
: Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 19:03
To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) ; Alla Goldner
; Gadiyar, Rajesh ; Phil
Robb
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org P ;
onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Team,
I am happy to represent
> *From:* Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 13:27
> *To:* 'Alla Goldner' ; Phil Robb <
> pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; Gadiyar, Rajesh
> *Cc:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
> *Subject:* RE: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how t
t;>;
Gadiyar, Rajesh mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>;
onap-tsc mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Yes.
Best reg
h mailto:rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>>
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>;
onap-tsc mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Given that during the trans
;; Gadiyar, Rajesh
> *Cc:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
> *Subject:* RE: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
> Representative to the LFN TAC
>
>
>
> Given that during the transition period into the LFN structure some
> continuity would make sen
To: 'Alla Goldner' ; Phil Robb
; Gadiyar, Rajesh
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Given that during the transition period into the LFN structure some continuity
would make
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 21:41
To: Phil Robb ; Gadiyar, Rajesh
Cc: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Yes.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
; onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Hello Rajesh and Alla:
Just so I'm clear on your +1s, you are agreeing with Jason's comment, with a
preference for #1 unless the TSC Chair does not want to s
Hi Phil
I am in favor with your proposal for #2
Best
Jamil
Le 11 janv. 2018 à 16:08, Phil Robb
mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>> a écrit :
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
Now that ONAP is a part of the Linux Foundation Networking (LFN) Directed Fund,
we need to decide how we are going to populate ou
Yes.
--
Regards,
Rajesh
From: Phil Robb
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 11:23 AM
To: Rajesh Gadiyar
Cc: Jason Hunt , Dhananjay Pavgi
, onap-tsc ,
"onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org"
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN
ote:
> +1
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Jason Hunt <
> djh...@us.ibm.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 9:38 AM
> *To: *Dhananjay Pavgi
> *Cc: *"onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org" ,
> onap-tsc
>
> *Subject: *Re: [onap-tsc] We need to d
Cc: onap-tsc ; onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
+1
From: mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
on behalf of Jason Hunt mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2018 a
+1
From: on behalf of Jason Hunt
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 9:38 AM
To: Dhananjay Pavgi
Cc: "onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org" ,
onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
#1 makes the most sense to me, bu
IN" , Phil Robb ,
onap-tsc
Date: 01/11/2018 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Sent by:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Support Option 1; as TSC Chair for a particular stream has broader 360
view of the pr
sday, January 11, 2018 10:24 PM
To: Phil Robb ; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to populate the ONAP
Representative to the LFN TAC
Just FYI:
- OPNFV TSC voted on Tuesday (Jan 9) to have TSC Chair to represent
OPNFV in TAC
- fd.io voted the same today to
Just FYI:
- OPNFV TSC voted on Tuesday (Jan 9) to have TSC Chair to represent
OPNFV in TAC
- fd.io voted the same today to have TSC Chair represent fd.io in TAC,
if I am not mistaken.
Option 1 is used by both of our sister communities under the same LFN.
Just an FYI.
Thanks
Thanks Phil. I agree with your recommendation – I would prefer #2, as well.
Thanks,
Chris
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:08 AM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] We need to decide how to pop
21 matches
Mail list logo
