Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

I downloaded a Mac image from " http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/macos/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg"; and ran it on Mac OS X 10.6.8. I tried to open my docuemnts(odt / odp / ods), edit them and saved them. AOO3.4 works well. So I vote "+1". Thanks! 2012

Re: Google CSE question

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:30 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, drew jensen > wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 21:46 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:44 PM, drew jensen > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > The documentation page on the main site contai

Re: May I use "OpenOffice.org" and "Apache Incubator" logos on OpenOffice.org CD

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:19 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > Hi drew, > > >> Let me update. > >> https://sites.google.com/site/khirano/Home/openoffice-org-3-3-0-cd > > Is it not possible for that person to create what they, and you, feel is > > appropriate and let the group see it, before sending i

Re: May I use "OpenOffice.org" and "Apache Incubator" logos on OpenOffice.org CD

Hi drew, >> Let me update. >> https://sites.google.com/site/khirano/Home/openoffice-org-3-3-0-cd > Is it not possible for that person to create what they, and you, feel is > appropriate and let the group see it, before sending it to the presses? I think it is possible because we could do that bef

How about the status of VBA?

Hi all, I am interested in VBA development, but I just found a wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/VBA, and it is long time ago. I can't find more documentations about this area, so I have some questions: 1, Is there any update about VBA? How can I get them? 2, Do we hav

Re: May I use "OpenOffice.org" and "Apache Incubator" logos on OpenOffice.org CD

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:33 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > Hi all, > > Let me update. > https://sites.google.com/site/khirano/Home/openoffice-org-3-3-0-cd > We made Rainbow version and Flower version of OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 for > Windows CD with 18 language packs, source code, SDK and set them in

Re: May I use "OpenOffice.org" and "Apache Incubator" logos on OpenOffice.org CD

Hi all, Let me update. https://sites.google.com/site/khirano/Home/openoffice-org-3-3-0-cd We made Rainbow version and Flower version of OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 for Windows CD with 18 language packs, source code, SDK and set them in slim cases. Some schools help distribute these CDs to their students

Re: Google CSE question

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, drew jensen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 21:46 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:44 PM, drew jensen >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > The documentation page on the main site contains a set of CSE boxes. >> > >> >> I assume you are talking about th

Re: Help with MacOSX Build

It took about one and half an hour for the whole building on my iMac (cpu : 3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, memory : 4GB 1067MHz DDR3). I ran command : build --all -P4 under "instsetoo_native". 2012/4/24 Dave Fisher > Hi, > > Thanks for the help. I have successfully built AOO 3.4 on MacOSX. It took >

Re: Google CSE question

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 21:46 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:44 PM, drew jensen > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The documentation page on the main site contains a set of CSE boxes. > > > > I assume you are talking about this page: > > http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/ > > > T

Re: OOo / zlib license oddness ...

Hi Michael, On 23.04.2012 21:40, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Andre, On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:35 +0800, Andre Fischer wrote: Thanks Michael for your analysis. No problem :-) hope it helps. I dont't think that copying the files is a problem. After all we are already unzipping the zlib t

Re: Google CSE question

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:44 PM, drew jensen wrote: > Hi, > > The documentation page on the main site contains a set of CSE boxes. > I assume you are talking about this page: http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/ > The actual Google CSE's behind those, such as: > http://www.google.com/cse/ho

Re: [Proposal] Official Google+ Page for Apache OpenOffice

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:24 AM, xia zhao wrote: > please add me lilyzh...@gmail.com > Done. -Rob > Lily > > 2012/4/19 Rob Weir > >> Like Twitter and Facebook, Google+ is a good way to engage with users >> and the larger OpenOffice ecosystem.  Unlike Twitter, Google+ has some >> enhanced capab

Running the RAT Report

Hi, I found and review the rat-excludes file. This is very well annotated. I would like to run the RAT report. Is there a build.xml available somewhere or am I expected to role my own? Regards, Dave

Re: Help with MacOSX Build

Hi, Thanks for the help. I have successfully built AOO 3.4 on MacOSX. It took a long time Regards, Dave On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Chao Huang wrote: > For my input mistake, please add "*--disable-mozilla*". Thanks! > > > 2012/4/23 Dave Fisher > >> >> On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Ch

Re: New Committer: Xia Zhao

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> I've also added the 4 new committers to the our Podling status file here: >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html > > > Thanks. I see them listed in the "News" but not in the "Project Info" > section

Re: mirrors, release publishing...again

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:39 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Mark Ramm wrote: > >> A few ways, some worse than others: > >> > >> 1) Offer several download links: "Download from Apache, from > >> SourceForge, from MirrorBrain". Of course that doesn't balance the > >> load,

Re: Extension website getting spammed

I would personally block all comments for now. On 4/23/12, Daniel Naber wrote: > Hi, > > my extension at [1] is getting spammed with spam comments. Even I as the > owner of the extension don't seem to have a way to remove those comments. > Is the site maintained at all? I emailed to the address

Re: RC Readmes point to Wiki ML Page that needs Update

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I did some double-checking of RC1 and updated > . > > The most interesting aspect is that there are a total of six readme copies in > the install; the only NOTICE and LICENSE files

RE: New Committer: Xia Zhao

For vote tallies, there is a privately-maintained roster on the PPMC SVN. It reflects the accurate status of PPMC members (since not all committers are established as PPMC members). -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 12:13

RE: RC Readmes point to Wiki ML Page that needs Update

I did some double-checking of RC1 and updated . The most interesting aspect is that there are a total of six readme copies in the install; the only NOTICE and LICENSE files are in an obscure place. Here is the layout: $PROGRAMFILES$\ Op

Re: Broken link on download page

Hi Stuart, great to see you back here. en-GB is still in the code. And translations are continued to be done in Pootle. Unfortunately, I've no clue how it works but others like Raphael Bircher or Juergen Schmidt can help you. Marcus Am 04/23/2012 04:12 PM, schrieb Stuart Swales: Now that

Re: [Proposal]"Transition" logo to use on release announcement

Am 04/23/2012 01:01 AM, schrieb RGB ES: El día 22 de abril de 2012 14:36, Dennis E. Hamilton escribió: That is nice. I notice that when presented at 50% the blemishes (some non-transparent residual white pixels around the letters) become unnoticeable. 50% remains a nice size, too. Anoth

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

Am 04/23/2012 12:24 AM, schrieb Juergen Schmidt: On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 05:49, drew wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 17:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: The vast majority of our downloads come from one of three pages: 1) www.openoffice.org/ 2) download.openoffice.org/ 3) www.openoffice.org/download

Re: mirrors, release publishing...again

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Mark Ramm wrote: >> A few ways, some worse than others: >> >> 1) Offer several download links:  "Download from Apache, from >> SourceForge, from MirrorBrain". Of course that doesn't balance the >> load, but maybe it would if we randomized the order that they are >>

Re: Extension website getting spammed

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: > Hi, > > my extension at [1] is getting spammed with spam comments. Even I as the > owner of the extension don't seem to have a way to remove those comments. > Is the site maintained at all? I emailed to the address given on the > contact page

Re: Response to spam on the user forum

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:35:18 +0200 Hagar Delest wrote: > Just some figures: > There was more than 1800 spam posts Sunday evening (few online mods this day > - like me - I guess). > The top posters had about 135 posts then 70 (single accounts). IP seems to be > in Bangladesh. > Almost 200 accoun

Re: Response to spam on the user forum

Just some figures: There was more than 1800 spam posts Sunday evening (few online mods this day - like me - I guess). The top posters had about 135 posts then 70 (single accounts). IP seems to be in Bangladesh. Almost 200 accounts have been banned in 3 days (from Apr. 19to Apr. 22). I've set a

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> It is the NL pages that I >>> am concerned about, since they have hard-coded logic that differs from >>> the above pages. >> >> >> The Italian one is probably the

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> It is the NL pages that I >> am concerned about, since they have hard-coded logic that differs from >> the above pages. > > > The Italian one is probably the worst at the moment, since it has hard-coded > links (to the

Re: New Committer: Xia Zhao

Rob Weir wrote: I've also added the 4 new committers to the our Podling status file here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html Thanks. I see them listed in the "News" but not in the "Project Info" section. Same for Hagar, I noticed it while computing the tally for a vote bu

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

Rob Weir wrote: It is the NL pages that I am concerned about, since they have hard-coded logic that differs from the above pages. The Italian one is probably the worst at the moment, since it has hard-coded links (to the Italian mirror; this is a relatively recent change to avoid depending on

Re: New Committer: Xia Zhao

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of committer > and PPMC member Xia Zhao, lilyzhao@ apache.org > > The list of all current podling committers is at: > . > I've also add

Extension website getting spammed

Hi, my extension at [1] is getting spammed with spam comments. Even I as the owner of the extension don't seem to have a way to remove those comments. Is the site maintained at all? I emailed to the address given on the contact page but got no reply. Any idea what to do against the spam? Maybe

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

On 04/23/2012 10:09 AM, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 04/22/2012 02:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote: The vast majority of our downloads come from one of three pages: I offer a bit of historical perspective on these for what it's worth: 1) www.openoffic

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 04/22/2012 02:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> The vast majority of our downloads come from one of three pages: > > > I offer a bit of historical perspective on these for what it's worth: > >> >> 1) www.openoffice.org/ > > -- the latest frie

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

+1 -- Bye, Yuri Dario /* * OS/2 open source software * http://web.os2power.com/yuri * http://www.netlabs.org */

Re: Response to spam on the user forum

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0600 "F C. Costero" wrote: > Thanks for the input Rob. I will pass it on to the forum. Some of the > volunteers commented over the weekend that it was more like a denial > of service attack. At one point the forum did become unavailable but > Hagar contacted Infra an

Re: Response to spam on the user forum

Thanks for the input Rob. I will pass it on to the forum. Some of the volunteers commented over the weekend that it was more like a denial of service attack. At one point the forum did become unavailable but Hagar contacted Infra and it was back on line promptly. A few spam messages are still comin

Re: Unifying download logic, especially from NL pages?

On 04/22/2012 02:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote: The vast majority of our downloads come from one of three pages: I offer a bit of historical perspective on these for what it's worth: 1) www.openoffice.org/ -- the latest friendly action oriented page that grew out from the revised...(I can get eve

Re: The 3.3.0 Version is now at the Apache Archive

Am 23.04.12 18:02, schrieb Regina Henschel: > Hi Raphael, > > Raphael Bircher schrieb: >> Hi all >> >> I just added the 3.3.0 Version to the Archive at Apache. So the mirrors >> can kill them after the release of the 3.4 Version. > > My concern is not only about the OOo3.3.0 itself, but about all t

RE: DicOOo Wizard ?? (+en_GB dictionary) (was Re: [RELEASE]: status update and plan)

I believe the GB dictionary is currently included in the RC1 Windows en-US full distribution so it is available, just not by that name (just as Postage Stamps don't say Great Britain, the extension is simply named dict-en.oxt [;<). The extension appears in the Extension Manager as "English spell

Re: The 3.3.0 Version is now at the Apache Archive

Hi Raphael, Raphael Bircher schrieb: Hi all I just added the 3.3.0 Version to the Archive at Apache. So the mirrors can kill them after the release of the 3.4 Version. My concern is not only about the OOo3.3.0 itself, but about all the other files like the language packs and localized versio

Re: DicOOo Wizard ?? (+en_GB dictionary) (was Re: [RELEASE]: status update and plan)

Hi Stuart; --- Lun 23/4/12, Stuart Swales ha scritto: ... > en_GB dict? it's been in the source > tree for ages!  See > http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/OOO330_m20/dictionaries/en/ > Hmm.. we removed all the dictionaries from the tree after the Apache move. Can you add the lat

Re: [TRANSLATION]: Request for translation and effort estimations

2012/4/23 Stuart Swales : > On 21/03/2012 14:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the Pootle server is updated to the latest resource strings and a first >> set of languages is provided. At least for the UI, help is in progress. >> The available languages are the languages where we have alread

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

+1 (PPMC, binding) and ditto Pedro's and Rob's comments on "we should be proud". I installed and ran some tests with the 32-bit Linux RPM binary. I had been using a developer build since Apr 4 (can't note the svn release number at the moment), and things were looking pretty good then to me. Toda

Re: Dwontime sheduled for the MediaWiki

On 4/23/2012 10:46, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi at all I will do same admin work at the wiki.service this night, The wiki will maybe not be aviable every time. I try to keep the off time as short as possible. Greetings Raphael Hi, Raphael, The two major problems I know of are: (1) Stale pages

Re: DicOOo Wizard ?? (+en_GB dictionary) (was Re: [RELEASE]: status update and plan)

en_GB dict? it's been in the source tree for ages! See http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/OOO330_m20/dictionaries/en/ Stuart On 04/04/2012 20:48, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 04/04/12 14:37, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 04/04/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/4/12 7:56 PM, Rob Weir wrot

Dwontime sheduled for the MediaWiki

Hi at all I will do same admin work at the wiki.service this night, The wiki will maybe not be aviable every time. I try to keep the off time as short as possible. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Joost Andrae wrote: > Hi, > > the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a different > directory. I had to deactivate Norton Sonar for the setup.exe file because > it quarantained setup.exe due to excecution of a second thread within the > bina

The 3.3.0 Version is now at the Apache Archive

Hi all I just added the 3.3.0 Version to the Archive at Apache. So the mirrors can kill them after the release of the 3.4 Version. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/

Re: [TRANSLATION]: Request for translation and effort estimations

On 21/03/2012 14:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, the Pootle server is updated to the latest resource strings and a first set of languages is provided. At least for the UI, help is in progress. The available languages are the languages where we have already provided developer snapshots, means langu

Re: Broken link on download page

Now that we are up and running again, I think it's worth resurrecting the en-GB localisation. I was lead prior to the Apache move and would be happy to resume. Stuart On 19/03/2012 22:22, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 03/19/2012 10:42 PM, schrieb Kurt Underhay: Hi Kurt, Thanks for the reply and

[DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 21:54, Joost Andrae wrote: > Hi, > > the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a > different directory. I had to deactivate Norton Sonar for the setup.exe > file because it quarantained setup.exe due to excecution of a second > thread withi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

On 23/04/2012 Joost Andrae wrote: the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a different directory. We had the same report in Italian tests, but we considered it normal (a stable version will remove the older version, and anyway removing 3.4 to go back to 3.3 will leave y

Re: mirrors, release publishing...again

On 20/04/2012 Mark Ramm wrote: * Route "autoupdater" traffic through one system (MirrorBrain) * Route web based traffic through another (SF as primary, and Apache mirrors as secondary) Note that "autoupdater" traffic is probably still web-based traffic: I cannot check now, since updateXY.servi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

Hi, the installation wipes-out OOo 3.3 although I installed it into a different directory. I had to deactivate Norton Sonar for the setup.exe file because it quarantained setup.exe due to excecution of a second thread within the binary (probably the vcredist file). This will most probably hap

Re: OOo / zlib license oddness ...

Hi Andre, On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:35 +0800, Andre Fischer wrote: > Thanks Michael for your analysis. No problem :-) hope it helps. > I dont't think that copying the files is a problem. After all we are > already unzipping the zlib tar ball to a location of our choosing. Why > should

Re: Apache OpenOffice

On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 16:18, Stephen Anstey wrote: > Dear Sir / Madam, > > Can you please tell me roughly when Apache OpenOffice is going to be released? > > Stephen Anstey I can't say it for sure but you can expect it quite soon. We are currently reviewing our first release candidate wh

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

Hi. 2012/4/22 Claudio Filho > Hi > > 2012/4/22 Rob Weir : > > Blog post: > > > http://www.escritoriolivre.org/artigo/extens%C3%B5es-no-apache-openoffice > > This is Luiz, our old OOo/BrOo user group leader in Brazil. > And how > we haven't a brazilian portuguese list here, i started the wo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

Hi, seems to be fine after the download has been initiated using wget. Sorry for the confusion... the MD5SUM of the German Windows installation set does not fit to the MD5SUM stored at http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/windows/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe.

Re: Response to spam on the user forum

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:22 PM, F C. Costero wrote: > The forum volunteers would like to inform the PPMC of recent events > and actions on the user forum. I offered to write this initial message > since the moderators have had a long and frustrating day. I hope I > avoid missing any important de

Little suggestion for improving the AOO 3.4 Release Notes slightly ...

In the process of checking the AOO 3.4 release notes, I did not find a link to Rob Weir's timeline which communicates how much work has gone into this project. Hence, I would suggest the inclusion of that link, su

Apache OpenOffice

Dear Sir / Madam, Can you please tell me roughly when Apache OpenOffice is going to be released? Stephen Anstey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

Hi, the MD5SUM of the German Windows installation set does not fit to the MD5SUM stored at http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/windows/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe.md5 C:\downloads>more Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe.md5 50736c27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

+1 PPMC non-binding. On Friday, April 20, 2012, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for > Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success

Re: [ooo-site]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2012-04-22 8:19 PM  Larry Gusaas wrote: >> >> I tried Firefox 11.0 and it redirected to >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebarand >> and downloaded the Intel version  OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012.04.21. 2:58 keltezéssel, Jürgen Schmidt írta: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

At 08:58 2012-04-21 +0800, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org. +1`

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

El día 21 de abril de 2012 02:58, Jürgen Schmidt escribió: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for > Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of > OpenOffic