Re: [Review|Discussion]For Ideas and Comments on the Vision of Writer's Track Changes Improvement

Oliver,I can not access http://www.ooocon.org/ to get your presentation for 2010 conf..And I am not authorized to access http://people.apache.org/~orw/**210-209-1-PB.pdf either..Could you please send your presentation to me?thanks. On Mon, Jul 9, 2

Re: Testing of SVN Bugzilla Robot enabled

On 09.07.2012 20:54, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jul 9, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: Testing is enabled now for the robot [1] that watches out for commits into our SVN-tree and updates then updates the corresponding bugzilla entry if an issue was referenced in the commit summary. [...] Cur

Re: [Review|Discussion]For Ideas and Comments on the Vision of Writer's Track Changes Improvement

Hi, On 10.07.2012 09:14, chengjh wrote: Oliver,I can not access http://www.ooocon.org/ to get your presentation for 2010 conf..And I am not authorized to access http://people.apache.org/~orw/**210-209-1-PB.pdf either..Could you please send your p

Re: [BUILDBOT] build breakers

On 09.07.2012 19:03, Andrew Rist wrote: an update on this... The Win buildbot is now on VS 2008, and building the same as the unofficial dev builds - the build runs through fine - the only issue left is that I can't find the install bits... do I need to run another step to generate them? The bu

CMS diff: Quality Assurance

Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openofficeorg.apache.org/openofficeorg%2Fqa.mdtext Shan Zhu Index: trunk/content/openofficeorg/qa.mdtext === --- trunk/content/openoffi

Re: comments.apache.org

Rob Weir wrote: ... https://comments.apache.org/ But it would probably work for API pages, or building guide, pages that are technical instructions. Yes, it would definitely be good to test it there. While it will only cause maintenance/moderation nightmares if we put it on a high-traffic pa

Re: CMS diff: Quality Assurance

Hi Shan, Thanks for your work. I has helped you to commit it. The page has been updated on the staging site. http://openofficeorg.staging.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html 2012/7/10 Shan Zhu : > Clone URL (Committers only): > https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://open

Re: CMS diff: Quality Assurance

Thanks, Zhe. It just a draft of main framework for the QA home page to organize the entrances about types of information for AOO QA. It will be adjusted during the process of content adding. Any comments are wellcome. Thanks in advance. Regards, Shan Zhu 2012/7/10 Zhe Liu > Hi Shan, > Thank

3.4.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 120240] Chinese (zh-CN) translation for 3.4.1

j...@apache.org has granted 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120240: Chinese (zh-CN) translation for 3.4.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120240 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org integrate updated translation for Chinese (zh-CN)

3.4.1_release_blocker granted: [Bug 120241] Czech (cs) translation for 3.4.1

j...@apache.org has granted 3.4.1_release_blocker: Bug 120241: Czech (cs) translation for 3.4.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120241 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org integrate updated translation for Czech

Re: comments.apache.org

On 7/10/12 1:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Jul 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> This looks interesting/useful: https://comments.apache.org/ >>> >>> Would this make sense for our core files under /ooo-site ? >> >> This is very cool

usage of Apple SpellServer in OOo

Hello, I'd post the following message to bugzi...@apache.org, they say that it's not a bug. (however I'm talking about a feature that is not correctly usable) regards, Christophe Delannoy How can I fix the Language for use with Apple SpellServer ? My case is particular : the original French or

Suggestion - file format

I have a suggestion for OpenOffice that I think will help it become more popular. Most users are not very computer savvy. They are afraid of incompatibility so they stick to Word which most people have. Therefore I think the default option when installing OpenOffic should be to save files in

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Hi, On 10.07.2012 03:51, Li Feng Wang wrote: Very useful to unify QA work, Suggest to add tag when file or verify defects, like [MemoryLeak]:Memory Leak defect, need verify via long time running. [Dev]: Open by developer, and may can't verify from user view. [Crash]: Crash defect [Regression]:R

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Hi Regina, On 10.07.2012 01:21, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, in times with CWS and EIS there was a description of Issues lifecyle, http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReloaded/Docs/QA-Reloaded-IssueHandlingOverview.html. Some parts are lost and others totally outdated. But I think, that such an

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Hi all, http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_lifecycle exist now. It is a Wiki, so feel free to edit it and improve it. Zhe Liu schrieb: 2012/7/10 Regina Henschel : Hi all, in times with CWS and EIS there was a description of Issues lifecyle, http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReload

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Hi Oliver, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb: Hi Regina, On 10.07.2012 01:21, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, in times with CWS and EIS there was a description of Issues lifecyle, http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReloaded/Docs/QA-Reloaded-IssueHandlingOverview.html. Some parts are lost and other

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: 116680 needs owner

Done on trunk and on the AOO34 branch. On 13.06.2012 10:35, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, I am checking our current planning wiki page for 3.4.1 and have noticed that issue 116680 needs an owner. It's related to the hunspell update. Who has time and will take care of this? I think it should be add

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 119732 as release blocker (fetch_tarballs.sh does not support multiple download sources)

Merge is done. -Andre On 09.07.2012 13:28, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi, I would like to merge bug 119732 [1] into the 3.4.1 branch. Among other things it allows to specify specific SVN revision numbers to download source tarballs from. This prevents source releases from breaking just because we

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]:propose bug 120096 (wipe up and wipe down effect works fail in Aoo 3.4,but ok in OO3.3) as release blocker‏

Fixed on trunk and the AOO34 branch. -Andre On 29.06.2012 13:27, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/26/12 11:17 AM, YangTerry wrote: Change the mail title Regression issue, and the slide transition is basic transition. +1 +1 because of regression. Do we have somebody working on it already? Can we

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Regina, thank you for your good work. One minor remark: May be we can use status "VERIFIED" for a two step verification: First step, verification on a dev. snapshot or on built version or ... --> change status to "VERIFIED". Second step, verification on a release candidate --> closing issue. It

Re: Suggestion - file format

2012/7/10 Shmuel Wolfson : > I have a suggestion for OpenOffice that I think will help it become more > popular. > > Most users are not very computer savvy. They are afraid of incompatibility > so they stick to Word which most people have. Therefore I think the default > option when installing Open

Re: comments.apache.org

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 12:56 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 7/10/12 1:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> > >> On Jul 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> This looks interesting/useful: https://comments.apache.org/ > >>> > >>> Would thi

Re: comments.apache.org

On 07/10/2012 03:32 PM, drew wrote: > One question: Is it possible to subscribe to a subset of comments, so if > a comment feature were added to both the on-line USER and API guides > could someone subscribe to notifications for incoming comments to the > user docs but not the API docs? > > Otherw

Re: Suggestion - file format

I hear your point. How about having the installer (at the end of the installation) take the user to a webpage with a video explaining how to save files in Office formats. I think that would help OpenOffice catch on more. Regards, Shmuel Wolfson 052-763-7133 On 10-Jul-12 4:23 PM, RGB ES wrote:

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Hi, On 10.07.2012 14:42, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Oliver, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb: Hi Regina, On 10.07.2012 01:21, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, in times with CWS and EIS there was a description of Issues lifecyle, http://www.openoffice.org/qa/ooQAReloaded/Docs/QA-Reloaded-IssueHan

[RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

Hi, all, Since we are stepping forward to the 3.4.1 release smoothly, I think maybe it is time for us to look ahead for our next release now. I remember we had a discussion previously on how to run AOO's future releases, time boxed vs content boxed, 3.4.1 vs 3.5 vs 4.0... I think we should res

Re: [QA] Workflow for Issues

Am 10.07.2012 14:29, schrieb Regina Henschel: Hi all, http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_lifecycle exist now. It is a Wiki, so feel free to edit it and improve it. I think that "Make sure it is a valid issue" [1] is not a QA job only. DEV is involved also and should be in future

[Call-for-Review] Issue 120224 Cell text direction changed after saved as doc file

Hi all, I have a fix to for bug 120224 , please review the patch attached to: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120224 Regards - Zuojun

[RELEASE][3.4.1][DEV-BUILD]: propose next dev snapshot for 3.4.1 based on revision 1359641

Hi, I would like to propose that we prepare the next dev snapshots for AOO 3.4.1 based on the revision 1359641. I would like to add 1 further languages for Slovak (sk) Languages: en-US ar cs de en-GB es fi fr gl hu it ja km nl ru sk sl pt-BR zh-CN zh-TW For better and complete testing I suggest

Re: comments.apache.org

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:37 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 07/10/2012 03:32 PM, drew wrote: > > One question: Is it possible to subscribe to a subset of comments, so if > > a comment feature were added to both the on-line USER and API guides > > could someone subscribe to notifications for incomin

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > Hi, all, > Since we are stepping forward to the 3.4.1 release smoothly, I think > maybe it is time for us to look ahead for our next release now. > > I remember we had a discussion previously on how to run AOO's future > releases, time bo

Re: comments.apache.org

On 07/10/2012 05:20 PM, drew jensen wrote: > > So - I wasn't sure on that - could I actually embed that into a page > right now, just by changing those variable in the js example and > 'go-live' with it, as a separate dashboard, for a set of files - just > like that, no further need to ask someone

Re: comments.apache.org

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:35 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 07/10/2012 05:20 PM, drew jensen wrote: > > > > So - I wasn't sure on that - could I actually embed that into a page > > right now, just by changing those variable in the js example and > > 'go-live' with it, as a separate dashboard, for

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

Shenfeng Liu wrote: Hi, all, Since we are stepping forward to the 3.4.1 release smoothly, I think maybe it is time for us to look ahead for our next release now. I remember we had a discussion previously on how to run AOO's future releases, time boxed vs content boxed, 3.4.1 vs 3.5 vs 4.0.

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

Just my $0.02 --- Mar 10/7/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: >> > But of course the open source ethos is "release early; > release often". > So we need some way to balance that as well. > I don't think that would play well for this project. It has certainly been bad for other projects already. We don

Re: svn commit: r1357306 - /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/solenv/bin/build.pl

Andre, this particular change is incompatible with my build system. I do [meta-shell code]: cd instsetoo_util; build --all --html The trunk now does this: build --all works as expected: dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' 1 module(s): framework need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s):

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Just my $0.02 > > --- Mar 10/7/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: > > >> > > But of course the open source ethos is "release early; > > release often". > > So we need some way to balance that as well. > > > > I don't think that would play well for t

Problem with page break in export to rtf

Hi, I have looked at the issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120173 but cannot decide whether it is something AOO should change. The problem: In OOo3.3 page breaks are exported as special character \page. In AOO 3.4 page breaks are exported as paragraph formatting property \

Re: Save as mobi or prc and epub

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Cherise Kelley wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there any chance that Open Office will add the option to save as > Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing ready mobi or prc > and Barnes and Noble ready epub > and iBookstore ready files, etc? > Hello Cherise, There are some exten

Error in Dutch version in CSV export from Calc

Hi, I have confirmed issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120216. The problem is, that the export from Calc to csv does not work. I guess, that there is something wrong in the translation, therefore I write to ooo-l...@incubator.apache.org. It is the string SCSTR_FIELDSEP.

[Proposal]Redirect qa.openoffice.org & www.openoffice.org/qa

Hi, The old qa site (http://qa.openoffice.org or http://www.openoffice.org/qa) is totally out of date. The content is confusing and keep people from getting involved. I has created one new simple page on http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/qa.html. I propose to redirect http://qa.openoffice

[QA discuss] How to make keywords(tags) better used

Hi, all, As QA, marking/tagging issues correspondingly is very useful. But I know, there is some way to use it in Bugzilla. I list some advantages and disadvantages about these ways, maybe not cover all. 1)Set keywords in keyword item: Advantage: a)From https://issues.apache.org/ooo/desc

Re: [QA discuss] How to make keywords(tags) better used

Good discussion. the third optinon ,+1 In bugzilla ,advanced search already include the keyword and summary qurey conditions On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Li Feng Wang wrote: > Hi, all, > > As QA, marking/tagging issues correspondingly is very useful. > But I know, there is some way to use

Re: Problem with page break in export to rtf

On 7/11/12 12:57 AM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > I have looked at the issue > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120173 but cannot decide > whether it is something AOO should change. > > The problem: In OOo3.3 page breaks are exported as special character > \page. In AOO 3.4 page

[QA][Request]Apply for the membership of AOO QA and edit permission in Bugzilla.

Hi, all I'm Zhu Shan, QA of LotusSymphony(FVT and Accessbility Testing) in the past 4 years, focus on Spreadsheet and Chart, also familiar with the features in common usage of Presentation. Now, I'm turning to Apache OpenOffice. I've participated the AOO3.4 GC build testing, created more than 30

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

On 7/10/12 11:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Just my $0.02 >> >> --- Mar 10/7/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: >> >>> But of course the open source ethos is "release early; >>> release often". >>> So we need some way to balance that as well. >

Re: [RELEASE] Next Release - 3.4.2? 3.5? 4.0?

This is a good topic. I prefer to having 2 major releases every year, like 3.x or 4.x. and there can be maintain releases like 3.x.x between major releases for fixes of critical issues. TLS is an valid idea. But we should not do that until we see tangible requirments from users and we have enoug

Re: [QA discuss] How to make keywords(tags) better used

it seem that Advanced field in new defect page contain the keyword option :you can select the predefined keyword and also input self-definded keyword On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:35 AM, liu ping wrote: > Good discussion. > > the third optinon ,+1 > > In bugzilla ,advanced search already include