Michal,
I just verified them. Thanks very much!
- Shenfeng
2012/8/26 Michal Hriň michalh...@aol.com
Shenfeng,
I published yours latest patches (which you send here 6 days ago).
Thanks.
Michal Hriň
Dňa Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:18:50 +0200 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org napísal:
On Sun,
Kay and Eric,
I suggest to put the release notes translation to:
http://www.openoffice.org/zh-cn/releases/3.4.1.html . (need to create the
folder releases)
- Simon
2012/8/25 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:04 PM, eric wu jinjin...@cs2c.com.cn wrote:
hi :
I
hi:
I have finished the translation of the release notes,please check the
attachments.thank you!
eric wu
From: Shenfeng Liu
Date: 2012-08-27 14:09
To: ooo-dev
Subject: Re: Re: The translation of AOO3.4.1 release notes and announcement
Kay and Eric,
I suggest to put the release notes
Hi all,
I put QA weekly report in [1]. also defect status report in [2]. Please
review.
[1]http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/WeeklyReport/20120827
[2]http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus/20120827
--
Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am 26.08.2012 23:42, schrieb Greg Madden:
I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's.
The issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice' in their
package management systems. Trying to find/install openoffice
Andrea,
Thanks for your explanation!
I think we can just follow the original process if the development is on
a feature branch, and close the defect only when the fix is available on
main trunk or a release. While if the fix is delivered directly to trunk or
a release branch, we can take the
On 26.08.2012 21:20, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi,
We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache Infrastructure
policy in managing external dependencies.
I may not be precisely correct and am looking for confirmation, but In general
i think we need to
(1) Completely avoid using
Hi, Simon:
The template is contained in SVT cases. If needed, we could add this case
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
Yi Xuan,
Do we have the scenario of applying template in SVT?
- Simon
2012/8/22 Yi Xuan Liu liuyixuan@gmail.com
hi, all
Yi Xuan,
So my understanding is that when new a slide (step 2), it is based on a
pre-defined template, right? If so, I think it is ok now, no need for
additional case.
Thanks!
- Simon
2012/8/27 Yi Xuan Liu liuyixuan@gmail.com
Hi, Simon:
The template is contained in SVT cases. If
hi,all
I developed two SVT cases on sample files ScenarioDesign.odt and
complex.odt.
- On sample file ScenarioDesign.odt, which size is 67KB, 4 pages and
ontains lots of tables.
This operation on this file mainly contains:
1. Merge cells
2. Split cells
Yes, simon[?]
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
Yi Xuan,
So my understanding is that when new a slide (step 2), it is based on a
pre-defined template, right? If so, I think it is ok now, no need for
additional case.
Thanks!
- Simon
2012/8/27 Yi
I'm using UNO API to set graphic bullet for a piece of text in SD, the
graphic is from gallery Bullets.
There are 62 gif graphics in gallery Bullets, and I set them as the
bullet graphic one by one. Most work fine, but the last 3 gif graphics
fails: the value of GraphicURL is
On 25.08.2012 17:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:52:17AM +0200, Pavel Janík wrote:
Hi Andre,
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 10.07.2012 21:47, Pavel Janík wrote:
Andre,
this particular change is incompatible with my build system. I do
Hi,
See the bug:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120399
Linux
ooobasis*-testtool*.deb ooobasis*-testtool*.rpm will be not generated
Mac
All files related to testtool will be not included in the dmg.
Windows
In Custom Setup page of installation Wizard, testtool will be not
included
Carsten ,
you need a refresch off the field ?
hope it helps
Fernand
Hello, i have a problem with formatting of a text field. I create a
text field in Java and insert this in a document.
The content is 0.0 and the format is the default currency. But the
content is not formatted. The document
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Roberto Galoppini rgalopp...@geek.net
wrote:
actually in different geographies are displayed different ads, and I need
the actual URL to eventually report internally issues with
On 8/27/2012 02:52, Ji Yan wrote:
Hi all,
I put QA weekly report in [1]. also defect status report in [2]. Please
review.
[1]http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/WeeklyReport/20120827
[2]http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus/20120827
Hi,
http://wiki.openoffice.org
Hi OpenOffice.org Webmaster,
I'm sorry to bother you.
I am Faith from Filepuma.com. I write to you just to consult whether we can
have a potential chance to cooperate with you. And recently we have updated
your product at our site that
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:47:23 -0400, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in
Ubuntu.
As the packages are the same provided by Apache Foundation, if you can
install Apache OO running dpkg -i *.deb you also can install
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:18:59 +0200, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote:
[...]
That is a problem. There is no META-Package to manage the high numbers
of packages you have to install.
I agree with you. I intend to create META-packages for each language
but for while I preferred to release
/WeeklyReport/**20120827http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/WeeklyReport/20120827
[2]http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus/**20120827http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus/20120827
Hi,
http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus
The ASF releases source code. We produce it, we develop it, we license it
and we release it.
We have also, as a courtesy to the community, released binaries (read: pre-
compiled and built s/w) as well. The binaries MUST be based on
the actual released code. But the s/w itself is what is produced
On Aug 26, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
No. There is NO WAY IN HELL the org can indemnify
a volunteer who produces a binary build themselves.
Please don't bother asking legal-discuss to tackle this.
Here's an analogy: for a long, long time Bill Rowe has
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, that's what end users care about. But it's not sufficient for AOO
since we are seeking alternative distribution channels.
What does that mean? Can I grok alternative distribution channels
as more mirrors or something else?
I will be out of the office starting 27/08/2012 and will not return until
17/09/2012.
Para qualquer assunto, encaminhe sua mensagem para Carlos Henrique dos Santos
Oliveira - chsolive...@globmail.com.br
Para qualquer assunto relacionado com o Suporte Unidades, contate Carlos
Henrique dos
Hi Oliver,
On 26.08.2012 14:13, oliver.brinz...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I confirm old issues with new versions of AOO?
Background: Some of my issues are more than 10 years old - originally submitted
with oo 1.0 ;-)
Some of them still exist, others may be fixed without closing the corresponding
hi,all:
I developed a sc SVT case on an ods sample file. This sample file is 9M,
which contains 35 sheets and lots of pictures and objects.
The operation is
1. Insert sheet
2. Insert chart
3. Insert picture
4. Insert fontwork
5. loop 1~4
The patch is at
There are, as many have pointed out, two issues. The first is, can AOO do
what it is doing - the answer to this one is yes and has been clearly
expressed a number of times in this thread. The second is whether AOO can
go a step further than what it is already doing. The answer to this is No,
as
Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, that's what end users care about.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM,
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 08/27/2012 08:43:35 AM:
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org,
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: 08/27/2012 08:44 AM
After this, please drop general@
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A signature does 2 things:
1. Ensures that no bits have been changed
2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted) entity.
Almost. It doesn't guarantee trust.
Sure it does. If
Hi Fernand,
the refresh don´t have a effect.
// Attach the fieldmaster to the field...
userField.attachTextFieldMaster(masterPropSet);
((XRefreshable) UnoRuntime.queryInterface(XRefreshable.class,
xTextFieldsSupplier.getTextFields())).refresh();
Am 27.08.2012 11:48, schrieb Fernand Vanrie:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After this, please drop general@
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A signature does 2 things:
1. Ensures that no bits have been changed
2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted)
Jim Jagielski wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38:15 -0400:
After this, please drop general@
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A signature does 2 things:
1. Ensures that no bits have been changed
2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted)
Maybe I'm missing something, but how is trying to police 3rd party
(Google) ads on a 3rd party (SF) distribution link a real concern of
this PPMC?
Adverts (and the downloads to go along with this) have been popular on
massive download portals for years, and will be for years to come.
They're
Bullshit. The policy is as old as the org itself and applies equally
to every project in the org including this one. Rob, if you had the vaguest
clue about the history of what the httpd project produces you would have
some idea of what the written policy is meant to cover. People who don't
Duplicate of 21 June letter.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, fa...@filepuma.com fa...@filepuma.com wrote:
Hi OpenOffice.org Webmaster,
I'm sorry to bother you.
I am Faith from Filepuma.com. I write to you just to consult whether we can
have a potential chance to cooperate with you. And
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bullshit. The policy is as old as the org itself and applies equally
The problem is that when someone questions what the policy is, as
several IPMC members have already, the response goes no further than
yelling that
The release documentation has far more precision in it than
a casual glance would indicate. There is no good reason to
write about every associated topic in a policy document.
I'm not going to read /dev/release.html to you personally Rob
but I will point out that several people including the IPMC
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The release documentation has far more precision in it than
a casual glance would indicate. There is no good reason to
write about every associated topic in a policy document.
I'm not going to read /dev/release.html
On Aug 27, 2012 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
...
But recall in all this that even when the PMC releases code, it is
signed by the individual RM, and not by the PMC itself.
Apache Subversion releases tend to have a half-dozen signatures. Thus, I'd
say they are signed by the
I oppose anything that generates more off-topic mailing list traffic.
Collaborative discussions surrounding documented policy belong on site-dev@.
Everything else is a waste of time for all concerned.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To:
Which better agrees with written policy anyway- the sigs
are part of the release package to be voted on and voted on
by the PMC, so even tho it constitutes individual sigs
those sigs (well at least the RM's sig) are PMC-approved.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41#comments
I responded to one, but since there are a few of them I could use some
help
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 19:17 +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, I wonder if it would be worth submitting a patch for Apache. It
looks like they have the other content types used by OpenOffice,
+1.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Which better agrees with written policy anyway- the sigs
are part of the release package to be voted on and voted on
by the PMC, so even tho it constitutes individual sigs
those sigs (well at least the RM's sig) are
On Aug 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Identity != Trust.
Identity + Reputation == Trust.
The signature only guarantees identity.
Signature does not guarantee reputation though. The point
is that reputation is dependent upon identity. And
identity is ensured
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41#comments
I responded to one, but
There is a missing distinction here.
The discussion about signed binaries is not about external signatures of the
kind used by release managers and others, nor about the external digests and
signatures that might be obtained in conjunction with a download.
The signing of code that I am talking
Why do persist in hijacking this thread Dennis?
Read the Subject again and ask yourself why you
are pursuing this line of inquiry here again-
it's just confusing people because you're asking
for new policy to be written and adopted at the
same time other people are arguing with each other
about
And so I get back to my question... How is this new requirement substantially
different from the kind of signing we do today?
And please notice the word substantially.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
There is a missing distinction here.
The
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:38 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Identity != Trust.
Identity + Reputation == Trust.
The signature only guarantees identity.
Signature does not guarantee reputation though. The point
is
Changing the subject to something more accurate due to thread drift.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Identity != Trust.
Identity + Reputation == Trust.
The signature only guarantees
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:43 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:16 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:43 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:22 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 19:17 +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, I wonder if it would be worth submitting a patch for
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Issac Goldstand is...@volo-net.comwrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but how is trying to police 3rd party
(Google) ads on a 3rd party (SF) distribution link a real concern of
this PPMC?
Adverts (and the downloads to go along with this) have been popular on
On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
People trust the Apache brand.
They download Apache stuff from somewhere.
That stuff is signed by an entity that is associated
with the Apache brand.
As you know, that last step does not occur today. If it did, then
we'd
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 20:18 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/24/2012 11:52 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/23/2012 04:24 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi Marcus,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:49:19AM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/18/2012 01:29 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
People trust the Apache brand.
They download Apache stuff from somewhere.
That stuff is signed by an entity that is associated
with the Apache brand.
As
Great question, Jim,
1. The first substantial difference is that the operating system that runs the
binary installer *always* and automatically checks the embedded signature and
warns users when there is no such signature or when the signature is not from a
trusted source (in the PKI
I'm not asking for anything. I am simply attempting to clarify what the
considerations are. Also, I did not inject the issue about binaries into the
discussion on general@ i.a.o.
Why do you find it necessary to put my contributions down rather than let them
go by if you see no value in them?
On 27 August 2012 19:03, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
So - if I may be so bold. Reading email this morning my gut feeling is
that there is a lot of violent agreement going on..
I agree. If everyone will just step away from their keyboards for a
couple of days, then come back with a precise
Hi everyone:
As Team Leader of TestLink, I'm very happy to read that you found it useful.
Important things:
1. new release 1.9.4 (with improvements in performance) is going to be released
on 20120902
2. You can get important info on several places
2.1 www.teamst.org - here there is a user
Hello again, Shenfeng and Eric--
Please see:
http://www.openoffice.org/zh-cn/news/aoo341.html
which was created by imacat on 23/08/2012.
I would think you would want to make changes to the existing page
instead of creating a new one. Yes?
If these notes are not where you'd like them, then,
Hi Kay,
I understand well, I try to explain if I can :)
Hello again, Shenfeng and Eric--
Please see:
http://www.openoffice.org/zh-cn/news/aoo341.html
which was created by imacat on 23/08/2012.
This is release anouncement.
I would think you would want to make changes to the existing
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The ASF releases code. PMCs vote on a SVN tag and on a release tarball
(distribution) made from that tag. There is a direct and easily
followed path between the bits the end-user gets and the bits that
the PMC has determined as the release.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
CVE-2012-2665 Manifest-processing errors in Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0
Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2665.html
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0,
Am 08/27/2012 12:38 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/27/2012 12:12 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 26, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/26/2012 11:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/26/2012 09:38 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Hi
On 08/27/2012 01:42 PM, Michal Hriň wrote:
Hi Kay,
I understand well, I try to explain if I can :)
OK...
Hello again, Shenfeng and Eric--
Please see:
http://www.openoffice.org/zh-cn/news/aoo341.html
which was created by imacat on 23/08/2012.
This is release anouncement.
I would
On 08/27/2012 02:07 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/27/2012 12:38 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/27/2012 12:12 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 26, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/26/2012 11:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/26/2012 09:38 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 26,
Am 08/27/2012 08:52 PM, schrieb drew:
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 20:18 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/24/2012 11:52 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/23/2012 04:24 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi Marcus,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:49:19AM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/18/2012 01:29 AM,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:26:45PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Can you confirm this especially for Chrome?
Howdy
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
64bit Ubuntu 11.04 - latest Chromium - still thinks I am 32Bit Debs :(
Please can you give me the first part of the data
snip
Howdy
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
64bit Ubuntu 11.04 - latest Chromium - still thinks I am 32Bit Debs :(
Please can you give me the first part of the data in the table
(Variables from the browser | Values)?
Thanks
Marcus
Copy/paste from the html
Am 08/27/2012 11:51 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:26:45PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Can you confirm this especially for Chrome?
Howdy
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
64bit Ubuntu 11.04 - latest Chromium - still thinks I am 32Bit Debs :(
Am 08/27/2012 11:51 PM, schrieb drew:
snip
Howdy
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
64bit Ubuntu 11.04 - latest Chromium - still thinks I am 32Bit Debs :(
Please can you give me the first part of the data in the table
(Variables from the browser | Values)?
Thanks
Marcus
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 18:51 -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:26:45PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Can you confirm this especially for Chrome?
Howdy
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
64bit Ubuntu 11.04 - latest Chromium - still thinks I
KG01 - see comments inline
On Aug 18, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Graham Lauder y...@apache.org wrote:
On 16/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
I've been looking at various survey tools and would like to recommend
that we deploy the open source survey
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Hello All;
I have a proposed draft of a template for use in creating Release
Notes at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Notes+Template.
All comments and changes are welcome. I believe that there is a way to
generate actual templates for the
Kay,
Yes, what imacat posted was the *3.4.1 announcement*. And what Eric
translated and I submitted is the *3.4.1 release notes* in Chinese version.
Originally, I hope to put the translated release notes to
zh-cn/releases/3.4.1.html . But I found I can not create a new directory,
so I just
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/zh-cn%2F3.4.1_rn.html
Shenfeng Liu eric wu
Index: trunk/content/zh-cn/3.4.1_rn.html
===
---
Kay,
Per Rob W's comments, I reversed 3.4.1.html, and created a new one:
zh-cn/3.4.1_rn.html. Please help to process.
Thanks!
- Shenfeng
2012/8/28 Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com
Kay,
Yes, what imacat posted was the *3.4.1 announcement*. And what Eric
translated and I submitted is the
Hi,
This patch fixed following problems:
1. When I run GUI test cases, vclauto can not get the valid screenshot.
2. Some scripts are not stable because the sleep time is not enough in
different platform.
3. Added load/new documents interface in VclApp.java.
I opened a defect[1] to track it.
Hi BZ admin,
We are requesting for a keyword, something like automation_bug, which
could be used to identify the issue found by automation test.
--
Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
85 matches
Mail list logo
