Re: [SOURCE]: code repo move after graduation

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:24:29 -0400: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:19 PM, jan iversen wrote: > > Question: > > > > If have made a "svn co" on the incubator version, will I have to do a new > > "svn co" on the new path, or will "svn update" (as usual) work ??? > > > > There is a c

Re: Policy question: How to link to books about OpenOffice?

Shane Curcuru wrote on Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:04:47 -0400: > places to directly order the book. So including an Amazon or B&N link > is fine if you want to do that. Note: it would not be a good idea to Maybe make it a rotating link? i.e., it points to each shop an equal portion of the time

Re: Need Apache Member/Officer to submit list creation request (Was: [PROPOSAL] Reinvigorate extension authors community)

Ross Gardler wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 15:51:04 +0100: > On 2 October 2012 15:40, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Dave Fisher wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:33:16 -0700: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5334 > >> > >> Someone else beat me

Re: Need Apache Member/Officer to submit list creation request (Was: [PROPOSAL] Reinvigorate extension authors community)

Dave Fisher wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:33:16 -0700: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5334 > > Someone else beat me to it. Actually they didn't, as of right now there is no request in the queue (private@incubator will be emailed a notification once the request is made)

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

Jim Jagielski wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38:15 -0400: > After this, please drop general@ > > On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > >> > >> A signature does 2 things: > >> > >> 1. Ensures that no bits have been changed > >> 2. That the bits come from a known (and trusted) en

Re: svn commit: r829379 - in /websites/production/ooo-site: cgi-bin/ content/

sebb wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 16:04:12 +0100: > On 21 August 2012 13:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200: > >> On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:

Re: svn commit: r829379 - in /websites/production/ooo-site: cgi-bin/ content/

Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 14:38:34 +0200: > On 8/20/12 10:02 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > >> @all: > >> > >> Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg > >> time) someone has published ag

Re: svn commit: r829379 - in /websites/production/ooo-site: cgi-bin/ content/

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 17:02:19 -0300: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:49:52PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > @all: > > > > Sorry but IMHO this process failed. Just today evening (Hamburg > > time) someone has published again website changes. > > > > If we rely on a proc

Re: Registration and Update Services - What Will Be The Load?

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200: > >> Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can > >> p

Re: Crediting patches, bug reporters, etc.

Yue Helen wrote on Wed, May 30, 2012 at 15:02:25 +0800: > Good suggestion to me! Others members could comment what else fields are > needed. > Tested by: We've used it a few times; I'm not sure the script looks for it. > 2012/5/30 Rob Weir > > > Patch by: > > Suggested by: > > Found by: > > R

Re: AOO fails to compile with Subversion 1.7

Damjan Jovanovic wrote on Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:27:50 +0200: > Apparently the problem is that Subversion 1.7 gives different and > unexpected output for "svnversion ." thus breaking the Python build > (http://rpatterson.net/blog/building-python-with-subversion-1.7). It prints "unversioned direct

Re: Mirroring both OOo and AOOo Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects]

Pedro Giffuni wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:25:53 -0700: > I don't think he suggested we force mirrors to carry > old versions. > > I think Kay's (and Regina's) concern will be solved once > 3.3.0 finds it's way into > http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/ > > And of course people can

Re: Mirroring both OOo and AOOo Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects]

k...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 14:38:34 -0700: > I'm assuming by Pedro's remark that if 3.3.0 is ported to Apache > archives, security patches will have been applied -- i.e. THAT version > rebuilt with security, right? "Rebuilt" kind of defeats the purpose of archives.. (the s

Mirroring both OOo and AOOo Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects]

policy is that Apache mirrors may only carry the latest release from each minor line (1.5.x, 1.6.x, ...) which is still supported / developed by the community. Cheers, -- Apache Infrastructure - Forwarded message from Daniel Shahaf - > From: Daniel Shahaf > Subject: Opt-out fr

Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Re: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects]

message from Daniel Shahaf - > From: Daniel Shahaf > Subject: Re: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects > To: [redacted] > Cc: infrastruct...@apache.org > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:57 +0300 > Message-ID: <20120420110557.GH2867@lp-shahaf.local> > &

Re: [WIKI] Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable)

TJ Frazier wrote on Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:22:37 -0400: > \sum_{k=1}^N k^2 > I confirm that changing the subscript value, s/k=1/k=2/, causes the > error indication. Other changes seem to work properly. > > @Daniel or Raphael: can you check the error logs and installation? Nothing in the error lo

Re: AOO timeline of accomplishments

Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:35:44 -0400: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Claudio Filho wrote: > > Hi > > > > 2012/3/10 Rob Weir : > >> A draft blog post using the timeline to make a point about our > >> migration efforts: > >> > >> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntr

Re: [RELEASE]: Where we are with the redirects to the new extension/template repos

drew wrote on Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:16:45 -0500: > On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 16:08 -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > > OK, extensions.openoffice.org AND templates.openoffice.org are now > > functioning -- i.e. redirecting to sourceforge.net. > > Howdy, > > Well, not just now they didn't. > > extensions.o

Re: OpenOffice.org email forwarder shutdown: That time is now

Which reminds me --- people who used their @openoffice.org address for their apache.org account, and have not yet added some other address to https://id.apache.org, please do so. It is quite a bit of headache for us to, for example, reset someone's password when their email address of record is in

Re: [Bugzilla] search function doesn't work

lou ql wrote on Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:40:45 +0800: > undef error - Cannot determine local time zone Fixed, thanks for the report. (mergemaster deleted /etc/localtime)

Re: Reminder: Not all list posts are from list subscribers

> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> Keep this in mind when you respond to questions posted on the list. > >>> Be sure to cc the poster on your response if they are not a list > >>> subscriber. Or, change the list configuration to not add a Reply-To header. > You i

Re: Where to hold an event

Ross Gardler wrote: > No, it doesn't automatically update. Thus is opt-in, it would be > inappropriate to do that automatically for everyone. auto-updated and opt-in-only aren't mutually exclusive. The real problem is that it won't let people not list projects that they have a commit bit to xor a

Re: Where to hold an event

Ross Gardler wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 17:08:23 +: > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. > On Feb 13, 2012 5:01 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote: > > > > Ross Gardler wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 16:47:59 +: > > > Sent from my

Re: Where to hold an event

Ross Gardler wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 16:47:59 +: > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. > > On Feb 13, 2012 3:52 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote: > > > > Ross Gardler wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:47:11 +: > > > Reply

Re: Where to hold an event

Ross Gardler wrote on Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:47:11 +: > Reply to this thread, or better still, submit your details to our "people > finder" see http://community.apache.org/speakers/speakers.html That one doesn't have an option to show only people in a given PMC, though...

Re: UI text not translated

Bugzilla has a knob (in Preferences, I think) to disable the intentional typoes. Judy Jones wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:41:52 +1100: > Hi Rob and Ulrich. > > Thanks for the explanations. > I still think it is a very user-unfriendly design decision. Users > [and possibly even developers] shou

Re: Apache list archive issues must be fixed soon

(CC please on replies) Infra has already looked into upgrading to mod_mbox trunk@HEAD. The upgrade was attempted, reverted due to causing silent breakage, and is on the queue for being re-attempted. On Tue, Jan 17, 2012, at 14:37, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks. > > On Tue, Jan 1

Re: [WWW] publish.pl question

Kay Schenk wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:13:41 -0800: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Kay Schenk wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 15:15:53 -0800: > > > OK, I'm looking at the publish.pl script and wonder if it can indeed be > > > us

Re: [WWW] publish.pl question

Kay Schenk wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 15:15:53 -0800: > OK, I'm looking at the publish.pl script and wonder if it can indeed be > used to just publish a single page or area rather than the WHOLE site by > supplying some appropriate escaping... > If you'd like to look into changing the build pr

Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site

Joe Schaefer wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 16:55:02 -0800: > - Original Message - > > > From: Daniel Shahaf > > To: Joe Schaefer > > Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" ; > > infrastruct...@apache.org > > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 6:

Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site

Joe Schaefer wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:52:39 -0800: > - Original Message - > > > From: Dave Fisher > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:40 PM > > Subject: Re: suggested CMS workflows for ooo-site > > > > > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 9:2

Re: Too many lists

Shane Curcuru wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:15:02 -0500: > A side note: > > On 2011-12-14 11:33 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > ...snip... > >the ooo-dev@i.a.o > >is one of the moast active ML at the whole Apche project. > > For those interested in activity statistics: > > http://pulse.apache.

Re: Handling and Reporting CVEs (was RE: Proposal: ooo-announce list)

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:21:33 -0800: > Well, the Apache practice is clear. > > Putting a CVE number in a patch is probably not the way to execute on that > practice, but that is not an Apache patch you are looking at. > > Red Hat also has a very large list of CVEs tha

Re: Extensions and templates

Gavin McDonald wrote on Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:50:33 +1000: > Help welcomed at any step of the way.

Re: Extensions and templates

Ross Gardler wrote on Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:53:13 +: > This is a public list so I want to state loudly, and clearly, that the ASF > has been and remains very happy with the facilities provided by OSUOSL over > many years. +1

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Trademark and Brand

On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:03 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote: > > > > > > From: Rob Weir > >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; tradema...@apache.org > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:58 AM > >Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Trademark and Brand > > > [...] > >

Re: Source Code Sponsor of OOo

Thomas Horn wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 18:44:45 +0100: > Hi all, > > I've read on http://teamopenoffice.org/en/become-a-partner.html that > you could become a "Source Code Sponsor" with your named displayed in > OpenOffice.org 3.4 by paying EUR 5000. > > Do you really thinks that this is a goo

Re: oooforum.org

On Sunday, November 20, 2011 1:30 PM, "RGB ES" wrote: > > Indeed. If something, we need to ask oooforum admin to write "The *non > official* openoffice.org forum" on the site header. Feel free to follow up on trademarks@ cc ooo-private@

Re: oooforum.org

On Sunday, November 20, 2011 1:18 PM, "Pavel Janík" wrote: > > I am wondering why we care on oooforum.org here when we have nothing > > to do with it? > > > We care about the good name of OpenOffice.org? Agreed, OOo ecosystem health is on-topic here.

Re: Getting permission to use OpenOffice Trademarks (draft)

On Saturday, November 19, 2011 8:27 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote: > Quite possibly. This is the first ASF project that, as far as I am aware, > has seen a need for explicit fundraising activities. Once this PPMC feels > comfortable with a proposal for this activity then trademarks and fundraising@

Re: Use of copyrighted images with permission

On Saturday, November 19, 2011 11:50 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote: > ASF logo's are available under the Apache licence but they are also > trademarks. People can reuse them just like our code. They can modify > them, but only in conformance with the trademark policy. Not sure that's accurate; I'm go

Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS

done neddam...@comcast.net wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:21:01 +: > I have tried 3 times to get my email removed by sending a message to the > autodelete mailbox. Please rmove mine also. neddam...@comcast.net. > > - Original Message - > From: "Emanuel Winocur" <2alw...@cox.net>

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Trademark and Brand

That's the tally. What's the result? Donald Harbison wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 20:21:19 -0500: > Ballot: *http://s.apache.org/SXM* > > > Voting is now closed. > > * **PPMC BALLOT RESULT* > > 14 TOTAL (a) Apache OpenOffice.org: 40.00% > > 20 TOTAL (b) Apache Ope

Re: Problem showing on main ASF page

On Sunday, November 13, 2011 5:11 PM, "t...@apache.org" wrote: > Daniel, > > On 11/13/2011 15:32, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Would have been useful if you noted the date/time you saw the site, the > > revision of ^/infrastructure/trunk/site at the time, or t

Re: Problem showing on main ASF page

Would have been useful if you noted the date/time you saw the site, the revision of ^/infrastructure/trunk/site at the time, or took a screenshot. The site regenerates hourly. Anyway, the subject line contains a ™ character, which had gotten encoded, was not decoded by mod_mbox (aka mail-archives

Re: Do recent bugs filed against Libre 3.4 need to be refiled with apache tracker?

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:56 -0500: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hello David; > > > > If you find a bug in OpenOffice.org file it directly > > on Apache's bugzilla. Duplicate bug reports are fine, > > they really are. > > > > So far I am the only o

Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other matters)

Olivier R. wrote on Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 17:14:03 +0100: > Le 07/11/2011 16:53, Rob Weir a écrit : > > >Why would Apache care about that? > > Maybe just because you are an Apache member Rob Weir is not a Member.

Re: Moved over the old OOo archive

Raphael Bircher wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:20:16 +0100: > Hi at all > > I just moved the old OOo archive to the Apache archive server. After > talkback with the infra team, I find out that it's allowed to have > old releases in the apache archive, even the builds are LGPLed. > Subversion has

Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses

Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 19:18:13 -0400: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > wrote: > >> Rob speaketh, > >> > >>   ... let's admit that almost all of the 500,000 openoffice.org > >>   addresses are unused or w

Re: request

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 13:19:46 -0400: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: > > 2011/11/2 Łukasz Janik : > >> Please translate the page http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/, in > >> various languages, including Polish, and the official site in apache > >> o

Re: Shutdown of the "download.services.openoffice.org" host and its Mirrorbrain instance

Marcus (OOo) wrote on Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:12:33 +0200: > Why OOo is special: > > - OOo 3.3 consists of ~1.000 files with ~70 GB > - in the peak with 300,000 downloads per day That's the relevant part of your email. I agree that 70GB per release is quite an outlier (and will cause issues not

Re: [DISCUSS] replace neon with libwww (preferred) or libcurl (as 2. choice)

a replacement for the glibc-stubs > functionality. I love it when pieces just fit in ;-). > > Pedro. > > --- On Thu, 10/27/11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Haven't read the thread, but: > > > > Subversion can use the serf library (Apache Licensed) > > instead of neon. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] replace neon with libwww (preferred) or libcurl (as 2. choice)

Haven't read the thread, but: Subversion can use the serf library (Apache Licensed) instead of neon.

Re: Shutdown of the "download.services.openoffice.org" host and its Mirrorbrain instance

Donald Whytock wrote on Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:53:05 -0400: > I didn't see anything about P2P at http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi. > Does anyone know if ASF has any capability for this? Not to my knowledge.

{most}.services.o.o are going away Re: [Proposal] Shutting down legacy OOo mailing lists

Seems to me this is too important to get buried in this thread... Andrew Rist wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 15:45:30 -0700: > > > > >< -- snipped --> > > > >>> > >>>My guess here is that it is highly unlikely that lists of users or > >>>the forwarding map will be made available. The best approach

Re: [REVIEW] Staged Migration of OO.o domain properties (long)

Alexandro Colorado wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 21:19:46 -0500: > In other words, a name like ".net" would never be possible under > apache because they have a strict policy of matching a brand with the > domain name. That's both false and shows a rather severe (and insulting) misunderstanding.

Re: working on a OpenOffice roadmap

Shane Curcuru wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:35:57 -0400: > However, there is a somewhat related precedent in the Apache > Subversion project, which shipped code as a podling under it's > previous license before creating a fully ASF "blessed" release. As > a widely used and mature project before

Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal

Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 18:34:46 -0400: > Don't lecture me on voting, Gavin. Read the the "Apache Voting > Process" [1], the section on "Implications of Voting", with my > emphasis: You are being incredibly rude, and also incredibly out of line to teach ASF Members (for the second

Re: [PROPOSAL] Juergen Schmidt for ooo-security list member

Ross Gardler wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 00:36:19 +0100: > On 19 October 2011 00:27, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > 1. This shouldn't be on ooo-dev@ > > Why not? Why are committer votes not done on a dev list?

Re: [PROPOSAL] Juergen Schmidt for ooo-security list member

Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 19:57:24 -0400: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > 2. You don't need to enter a jira issue to subscribe someone to that list > > > > I thought only list moderators could subscribe/unsubscribe others?

Re: [PROPOSAL] Juergen Schmidt for ooo-security list member

1. This shouldn't be on ooo-dev@ 2. You don't need to enter a jira issue to subscribe someone to that list 3. You know both of the above facts very well, so what on earth caused you to start this thread here and claim that you need to file a jira to subscribe Jürgen to ooo-security@? Rob Weir wr

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 18:34:33 -0400: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200: > >> svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS > 1 > >> ed 1 > >> svnrdump load $

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 21:39:12 +0200: > svnrdump dump -r 49548 $SOURCE_REPOS > 1 > ed 1 > svnrdump load $TARGET_REPOS < 1 > svn pl --revprop -r0 $TARGET_REPOS > [ edit the svn:sync-* revprops ] > > I like this idiom :-) > svnrdump is available in Subversion 1.7 and newer.

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 15:33:36 -0400: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > > > > --- On Sun, 10/16/11, Rob Weir wrote: > > ... > >> > >> The sync has died.  Stuck on this error: > >> > > :( > > > >> > >> The next revision has a huge memo, over 1MB long:

Re: Hosting OpenGrok?

Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 00:04:59 +0200: > I don't wanted to be arrogant or presumptuous but i really don't care here > about other projects. Infra won't install your stuff without considering the effect on the 100 or so other ASF projects too.

Re: Hosting OpenGrok?

Michael Stahl wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 23:51:53 +0200: > On 15.10.2011 22:13, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We already use Atlassians Fisheye tool on an external copy of our repo. This > > has > > excellent tools including the code search facilities you need. > > it looks like an

Re: Hosting OpenGrok?

Jürgen Schmidt wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 22:39:56 +0200: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Someone asked this a couple of weeks ago, IIRC the answer was (a) need > > to evaluate this, (b) viewvc (which is already installed) has > > a se

Re: [DISCUSS] When Is a PPMC Invitee a PPMC Member?

Are you actually going to run into a situation where a person gains or loses their PPMC Member bit _while_ a [VOTE] is undergoing, _and_ that person's vote determines whether the [VOTE] passes or fails? Carl Marcum wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 16:02:41 -0400: > On 10/15/2011 02:40 PM, Dennis E. H

Re: Hosting OpenGrok?

Someone asked this a couple of weeks ago, IIRC the answer was (a) need to evaluate this, (b) viewvc (which is already installed) has a search feature, whether it would be sufficient. Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 18:58:27 -0400: > The legacy OpenOffice.org project had an instance [1] of a

Re: Can we close the old mercury servers?

Dave Fisher wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:56:10 -0700: > > On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ross Gardler > > wrote: > >> One of the comments on the Foundation blog is: > >> > >> "Unless I'm mistaken, nothing has happened in the last 6 month

Re: ooo-security and securityteam@ OO.o coordination

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:26:56 -0700: > CVE registrations are not the same as advisories and security-update > announcements, such as this one from a downstream dependency impacted by > vulnerability CVE-2008-2370: > .

Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement

Ross Gardler wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 23:11:23 +0100: > On 11 October 2011 23:07, Rob Weir wrote: > > In any case, the right way to handle this is just to take out the > > mention of "ASF".  If indeed the PPMC has delegated authority, then it > > is sufficient to just mention the PPMC. > > T

Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement

drew wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 18:07:35 -0400: > On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 23:58 +0200, floris v wrote: > > Op 11-10-2011 23:46, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef: > > >> *H.* Should the ASF or the Apache OpenOffice.org project decide to > > >> terminate its support of the forums, it will grant a period o

Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement

Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 15:13:31 -0400: > To enable list-based discussion of the proposal, I'm pasting in the > current wiki markup. This will allow anyone to enter inline > commentary, as a response, to the quoted original. > Thanks! > *H.* Should the ASF or the Apache OpenOffic

Re: [DISCUSS] Publishing the PPMC Roster

Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:10:27 -0400: > we're supposed to subscribe to that list using our Apache alias. > Untrue.

Re: PMC report for October 2011

Alexandro Colorado wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:46:36 -0500: > AFAIK the current status of the report cover most of the points. The only > ones that don't cover are really not needed, like privat matters. Not sure what you mean by that. It's occasionally needed to include information in the b

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for October 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)

> Marketing is not simply about pr +1

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for October 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Graham Lauder wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 07:02:17 +1300: > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 05:16:15 AM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > These announcements to a list are interesting, because it is not clear who > > will take the initiative to see that this happens. > > > > Last month, I waited too lon

Re: "LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later"

If you need to commit from a cron, talk to infra, but don't store your password on people.a.o. Dave Fisher wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:54:23 -1000: > I've studied how this is done on www.apache.org. We could aggregate > recent issues, commits and blogs. This would be crond scripted in > a peo

Re: "LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later"

Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:03:08 -0400: > An interesting new article in Lwn.net by Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier. > > https://lwn.net/Articles/458974/ > > There are a couple factual errors there in describing our project: > > 1) The article claims that we have not added any committers s

Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?

Dave Fisher wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 14:17:43 -0700: > http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.4/apr__getopt_8h-source.html > > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.developer.usingapi.html > That's an old/previous release of the book. Also: http://subversion.apache.org/HACKING > > On Sep 15,

Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?

Yes, apr_getopt calls in Subversion would come from one of those two libraries. If you need a minimal example I suggest subversion/svnversion/main.c and subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c. Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 13:41:39 -0700: > Support for w_char matte

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:29:05 -0700: > Rob, > > 1. Considering that the Bulldozing term and thread were on > ooo-private, it will be weird to have that reported here as status of > a group that was not privy to it. (The IPMC and mentors already > know, of course.)

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)

ormal? > Yes, minutes aren't published until the board approves them in a subsequent meeting. Until then, the agenda/minutes are maintained in a non-public area of svn. > - Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] >

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:16:55 -0700: > > I've responded to your questions in-line. > > > > With regard to detail, this is probably the longest report already. For > context, look at the complete set of reports so far, > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Get lazy consensus on to recommend that the trademark permission be granted to TLM Ltd

Ian Lynch wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:16:39 +0100: > The Lazy Consensus period has now passed so there is PPMC agreement with the > proposal. I now need trademarks@ to take any vote necessary to complete the > process. (Mentors, if I have any of this wrong please let me know :-) ) You called

Re: Bug reporting, handling rules

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:23:55 -0700: > I think the first problem is there is great confusion about what "FR > web forum" is doing. FR is providing an accurate Sender address, but > the list doesn't show that (or at least, not in my e-mail client), it > shows the "From:"

Re: Bug reporting, handling rules

Agreed that "How to set up my mail client properly for this list?" is on-topic for this list. On Thursday, September 08, 2011 2:24 PM, "Danese Cooper" wrote: > Thanks Shane for further clarification on anonymity. > > On the subject of free.fr, in reviewing the thread I notice that Eric B (who

Re: Bug reporting, handling rules

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 21:18:31 -0400: > I'd recommend handling this via respectful discussion with the user on > the list, expressing your concerns. Do me a favor and quit making those implications. We ARE having a discussion with the user.

Re: Bug reporting, handling rules

7; domain. > Shouldn't a moderator turn this subscription off? (or not allow it in?) > +1 > Regards, > Dave > > On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Don't set your From address to an @nike.apache.org address. Set it to > > a real emai

Re: Bug reporting, handling rules

Don't set your From address to an @nike.apache.org address. Set it to a real email address. FR web forum wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 19:53:44 +0200: > > > >On OOo QA site can be found three page > http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html > http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_ha

Re: [RT] Create a second incubator podling - the ooo forums

Shane Curcuru wrote on Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:01:04 -0400: > The fundamental issues requiring some sort of agreement or change are: > > 1 - The Oracle servers the forums live on are going away (someday). > Hence, the existing technical and organizational leaders of the > forums *must* migrate the

Re: What is needed for Support Forums to be fully integrated into the Apache OpenOffice.org project

Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:06:31 -0400: > I suspect I will be blamed for the *next* time Terry resigns as well, > so I apologize in advance for whenever that day (or hour) comes. That wasn't necessary.

Re: threading Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

thread too. Also, if I had to save a draft for continuing later, that > might lose the reply thread. I don't know. > > Generally, it is very difficult to honor an etiquette the effects of which > are invisible to me. For me, the list arrives chronologically in a separate >

Re: threading Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

Eike Rathke wrote on Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 16:35:32 +0200: > Hi, > > On Monday, 2011-09-05 15:33:13 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Dennis, some of your recent replies (including the one I'm replying to) > > break threading (at least in Mutt), could you look into th

Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

Rob Weir wrote on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 13:01:50 -0400: > I think it would be good if they made up their mind soon. I thought > we were close to the physical migration being completed. If the > current volunteers are not on board with the Apache project, then > we'll need to explore alternative ap

threading Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

Dennis, some of your recent replies (including the one I'm replying to) break threading (at least in Mutt), could you look into that please? (The mails appear in the same thread, as a new reply to the first post of the thread.) Thanks. Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 16:29:02 -

Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

drew wrote on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 14:12:49 -0400: > On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 14:05 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > Being a member-based organization the ASF requires > > > that all foundation activities be subject to member > > > scrutiny (with on

Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers

Terry Ellison wrote on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 18:09:15 +0100: > On 04/09/11 16:49, Rob Weir wrote: > >... we are not discussing project operations on ooo-private. We > >use that list for voting in new committers and for exchanging > >confidential information, like the real email addresses of new > >

Re: Apache Way community moderation rationale

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 08:24:40 -0700: > We are also not in control at this time, as far as I know. The > registry information still has Oracle Corporation as the Registrant > Organization. > > When the domain transfer at the registrar happens, we can worry about > tak

  1   2   >