2012/3/13 Jürgen Schmidt
> On 3/12/12 11:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Rist**
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/3/12 Jürgen
>>> Schmidthttp://googlemail.com>
>
>
Hi,
>
> I w
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots based
> on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not the
> latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an increased
> build
On 3/12/12 11:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Ristwrote:
On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2012/3/12 Jürgen
Schmidt
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed
Hi Kay, Andrew, *
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:28:11PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >> Could someone at some point enlighten us as to WHY the latest revisions
> >> aren't automatically scooped up by the buildbot?
> >>
> > The build bots pull the latest code every night.
> >
> > Or amybe a wiki page o
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:48:59AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev
> snapshots based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed
> revision). It is not the latest working buildbot revision but I
> would like to include
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>
> On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> 2012/3/12 Jürgen
>> Schmidt
>> >
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
>>> based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It
Hi,
On 12.03.2012 09:48, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots based on
the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not the latest
working buildbot revision but I would like to include an increased buildid.
It is still
On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2012/3/12 Jürgen Schmidt
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not
the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased b
2012/3/12 Jürgen Schmidt
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
> based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not
> the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
> increased buildid.
>
Hi Juergen--
Could so
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots based
> on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not the
> latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an increased
> build
On 3/12/12 10:05 AM, rjaas...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt [jogischm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but
Jürgen Schmidt [jogischm...@googlemail.com] kirjoitti:
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
I
Hi,
I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots
based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is
not the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an
increased buildid.
It is still no a official RC because of the existing show
13 matches
Mail list logo
