On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:18:14AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> In short, gid_Module_Root_Brand can be made a real meta package,
> and linuxreplaces is the only solution to remove old basis packages.
> (I still didn't look at the desktop integration package issue)
The desktop integration
Hi Kay,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:28:38PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>* Apache OpenOffice orphans some packages that are no longer present:
> >>In the basis layer:
> >>oooimprovement
> >>kde-integration [yes, AOO has no KDE integration]
>
> Ariel --
>
> Well...my "kde integration" seems to be
On 04/11/2012 07:45 AM, � wrote:
On 4/11/12 2:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Andre, *
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:57:35AM +0800, Andre Fischer wrote:
Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
https://issues.
On 4/11/12 2:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Andre, *
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:57:35AM +0800, Andre Fischer wrote:
Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=11916
Hi Andre, *
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:57:35AM +0800, Andre Fischer wrote:
> >>Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
> >>Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
> >>https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
> >>
> >>I think we haven't noticed th
On 10.04.2012 07:12, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
I think
2012/4/9 Jürgen Schmidt
> On 4/9/12 1:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>
>>> I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
>>>>> May be I had overseen something.
>&g
On 04/10/2012 03:05 AM, RGB ES wrote:
El d�a 10 de abril de 2012 09:12, J�rgen Schmidt
escribi�:
I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta
package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop
integrations?
Some time ago, openSUSE replaced th
El día 10 de abril de 2012 09:12, Jürgen Schmidt
escribió:
>
> I am no expert in this area but would it be possible to define a meta
> package that do some clean unintall of older basis packages and desktop
> integrations?
>
Some time ago, openSUSE replaced their go-oo build with LibO (without
a
Juergen,
Is this anyplace we can record this important known issues and let end user
aware it? Like release notes or somethings else like technical note etc?
Best regards,
Lily
2012/4/10 Jürgen Schmidt
> On 4/10/12 4:33 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>
>> Hi Lily,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012
On 4/10/12 4:33 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Lily,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:20:50AM +0800, xia zhao wrote:
Ariel,
Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually?
I don't mean anything, I'm just describing the situation: that's the way
I has been working since OOo 3.0.0
Just switching the subject for easier lookup.
thanks guys for the help!
From: Greg Roberts
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org"
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: Linux builds follow up on Ubuntu 11.10 failures fixed
Thanks Mech!
ng triggers for menu ...
greg@greg-ThinkPad-T60:~/Downloads/en-US/DEBS/desktop-integration$
From: Mechtilde
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: Linux builds follow up on Ubuntu 11.10 failures
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
Hi Lily,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:20:50AM +0800, xia zhao wrote:
> Ariel,
>
> Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually?
I don't mean anything, I'm just describing the situation: that's the way
I has been working since OOo 3.0.0
> It isn't reasonable for end users.
Yes. Qui
Ariel,
Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually? It isn't
reasonable for end users.
Though keeping the old package is default behavior, I couldn't understand
the reason. If just want to keeping the previous configuration etc, is it
possible to split and erase other packages?
No
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
> Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
>
> I think we haven't noticed this problem before a
Le Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:38:06 +0200, Mechtilde a écrit :
there are twoe ways to solve it:
Either you deinstall the version of your distribution (here: Ubuntu)
completely
Or you don't install the desktop-integration and do it manually.
If you install a software beside your distribution you sho
El día 9 de abril de 2012 12:16, Jürgen Schmidt
escribió:
>
> Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new Linux
> packages and can verify the reported problem, see
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
>
> I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I wo
On 4/9/12 1:31 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
May be I had overseen something.
yes you have, Ariel had to built on revision 1310206 because of issue
El día 9 de abril de 2012 06:43, Greg Roberts
escribió:
> Guys,
>
> I'm not sure if this the correct thread to ask. But, I downloaded the Full
> Install set from the following
> URL: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots#AOO3.4UnofficialDevel
. Errors were encountered while
> processing: openoffice.org3.4-debian-menus_3.4-9589_all.deb
>
> I have tried removing the openoffice.org.xml and that had no
> effect. Please help. :D
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> From: Greg Roberts
>
___
From: Greg Roberts
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org"
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Linux builds
Guys,
I'm not sure if this the correct thread to ask. But, I downloaded the Full
Install set from the following
URL: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
2012 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Linux builds
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >> I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
> >> May be I had overseen something.
> >
> >
> > yes you have, Ariel had to built
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:54:35AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >> I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
> >> May be I had overseen something.
> >
> >
> > yes you have, Ariel had to built on revision 1310206 because of issue
> >
Thanks Juergen, Ariel.
Regards
Josef
Am 08.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi *,
2012/4/8 Jürgen Schmidt:
On 4/8/12 12:27 PM, Josef Latt wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
May be I had overseen something.
yes you have, Ariel had to built on rev
Hi *,
2012/4/8 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 4/8/12 12:27 PM, Josef Latt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
>> May be I had overseen something.
>
>
> yes you have, Ariel had to built on revision 1310206 because of issue
On 4/8/12 12:27 PM, Josef Latt wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
May be I had overseen something.
yes you have, Ariel had to built on revision 1310206 because of issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119168
Check http://people.apache.org/~ar
Hi,
I'm missing the linux builds revision 1309668.
May be I had overseen something.
What do you mean about announcing developer builds in the ooo-announce
mailinglist because of the high traffic here.
Regards Josef
--
PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055
http://keyserver.pgp.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
