On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
> Reportedly, the language tool extension does not work with Java 7.
> Under Linux all Java databases including the embedded ones do not run
> properly with Java 7.
>
Could you please point me to bug reports at bugs.sun.com or OpenJDK ?
I hav
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
> scroll down to the latest "Java SE 6 Update", click the download button
> in the second column (below "JRE"), confirm the license blah and then
> you download the full package
>
Java 6 is also on the way out. Oracle extended the life of Java
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Tom Panfil wrote:
> The Catch-22 part of this is that they cannot send from those re-mailer
> addresses, like my Reply-To address on this message.
Why not? It seems like a problem with those remailers, then, not this list.
I have used remailers before (a long, lo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> I think that documents need a format for the published status, something
> not editable. What's wrong with PDF?
PDF only stores the visual representation of a "page" (a printed page), in
other words, can render text, and graphics, and tables
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
> You should be able to set this yourself, through the Tools > Customize >
> Keyboard dialog. Select the down-arrow key, then assign the Navigate > to
> End of Line function.
>
> HTH,
>
I must be missing something, but on every word processor I´
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Johnny Rosenberg
wrote:
> So what office software (compatible with ODF) do you run on an iPad?
There is a company offering a remote openoffice session on the cloud,
as a service. Haven´t used them, can´t vouch for them.
https://www.rollapp.com/OpenOffice
FC
--
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> Follow this link, it has the answer to your problem
> http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=39277
Basically (to sabe you reading time) my suggestion is for you to try this
Windows Installer Cleanup
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:11 AM, roy wrote:
> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> Basically I cannot down-load the Open office programme at all.
> I was using the calc section before the pc crashed
> I have reinstalled Windows XP Proffessional.plus service pack3
> Previously I had a large file of
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Dale Erwin wrote:
> I know Java is not a slow as other interpreted languages, but still...
Several misconceptions.
1. Java is not "an interpreted language". Java bytecode is compiled to
native code on the fly by the JIT. Heard of the JIT?
"JIT builds upon two
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Niall Martin
wrote:
> See e.g.
> http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/08/30/how-turn-off-java-browser/ and
> other pages on
> that site. Bill Pitlovany of Win Patrol was also offering similar advice.
> Best wishes
For a bug that has been already fixed yesterday
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:48 AM, suhail ansari wrote:
> and hopefully AOO 5
> or 6 will run entirely on JVM.
Bring 50 _experienced_ java programmers with you and I´m sure the
project admins will welcome the effort. Having just a ´proposal´ or
´good idea´ won´t fly, IMHO.
Until then, AOO is open
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > and worthless tripe to ever show its disgusting face on the 'net.
>
> I completely disagree with this statement. Java is wonderful on the
> server-side it is possible to write webapps that truly work on all types of
> servers.
Agree. And
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> There´s a good Office suite written in Java, it´s ThinkFree Office.
> But it´s not open source. www.thinkfree.com
Sorry I included the wrong URL. FWIW the Java-based desktop version of
Thinkfree can be downloaded from
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Heh wrote:
> You're speaking for me also. Besides...java and flash are the most useless
> and worthless tripe to ever show its disgusting face on the 'net.
No, I disagree with the last part. I like Java very much, now even
more thanks to GPL Java aka OpenJDK.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:14 PM, suhail ansari wrote:
> Myself Suhail. I hope that Apache will consider rewriting OpenOffice in
> JavaFX and Jython.
Once again, you with this idea?. You got plenty of replies last time.
AOO is a complex enough C++ code base that abandoning it to "rewrite
it" in a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> I incline to the view that we should have some sort of intelligence test
> before subscr
Back in the old days, you had to learn to configure a COM (RS232) port
for your dial-up modem, set up the dial-up modem "log-in script", and
then inst
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> It is the same as I have written before! It intercept printer commands
> because "printing of empty pages" can be un/set in the printer command.
No it is not.
It´s quite handy, actually, and it had a better print preview than
windows´ o
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jeffrey Deutsch
wrote:
> I just heard of PrintEco - http://printecosoftware.com/ - a nifty*
> utility that effectively compresses printouts so you can save paper.
Really old old old concept. 12 years ago I used to use Fine Print
(still available, and now supports
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jeffrey Deutsch
wrote:
>
> It's made for the Microsoft Office Suite** - Does it also work with
> OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
If it´s a tool that intercepts print jobs and modifies them BEFORE the
print jobs are sent to the Windows print spooler, then YES; it shuold
wo
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Gerry Wittenberg wrote:
> Hi
You not only need to download Java but to INSTALL it. Did you
double-click on the downloaded file and run the Java installer?
FC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-u
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Jon B wrote:
> Is it possible to use oo on iPad.
> If so where do I go to download?
> I use oo on my pc and now I've upgraded to an iPad (yes,upgraded) I would
> like to stay with oo.
> Thanks Jon
There is no version of OpenOffice for iPad.
However there are clo
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> , why there are no templates in OpenOffice.org (or
> even LibreOffice).
I remember creating Avery labels in StarOffice 6.0...
Commercial templates and add-ons were one of the selling points of StarOffice.
Let´s thank the LibreOffice f
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Dale Erwin wrote:
> It took me quite a while to figure out how to make the assignment, but I
> finally did it, and it's working great.
It is called "learning". The first time I used MS WinWord 2.5 it also
"took me quite a while" to undersand how to align paragraph
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Scooter C wrote:
> I agree this IS getting ridiculous!
Just ignore the thread and it'll die off on its own. Instead,
complaining about it only helps the snowball to keep rolling.
FC
-
To unsubscr
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:51 PM, James Knott wrote:
> If you don't want my comments, then keep the religious crap out. Religion is
> a delusion that's an insult to human intelligence and reason.
Let's try to be civil and respect each other, even if the beliefs of
the other party seem ludicrous :)
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:51 AM, James Knott wrote:
> BTW, "God" will not help you. Religion is a delusion.
+1 ROFL-
Yet, if we get from programming language religion arguments to
so-called theological arguments on this list, I guess this will be the
futureo of the AOO mailing list. ;)
http://im
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:52 PM, hw huyler wrote:
> OOo,
>
> I cannot open a MS Excel .xls file.
> I ha an updated JRE.
> I can open it on my iMac with OOo.
> See attached
In screen #2, you select OpenOffice org 1.0 spreadsheet as the filter to use.
How do you exect it not to fail?. You should s
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I' d like to see that too, but given the different licenses, I' d say the
> LO license fits the rest of the GNU system more than the AOO one.
>
> Having said that, nothing prevents Linux distros from packaging non-
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Eduardo Alexandre
wrote:
> Is there any possibility of OpenOffice become the standard office suite for
> Linux distributions like Ubuntu, for example?
>
> What would it take for this?
>
> Greats,
> Eduardo Alexandre
>
I' d like to see that too, but given the diff
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:57 AM, bob hake wrote:
> I couldn't download it either: tried twice; Thanks Phyllis Hake. Hope it
> works soon.
wget -c "http://url-here"; is your friend.
wget comes pre-installed in most Linux distributions, and you can find
Windows versions here: http://users.ugent.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Dan wrote:
> The quick-loader loads in RAM and runs parts of AOO in the background.
> This is the way it is designed. The standard Windows install or standard
> uninstall programs may not be designed to do this. It would be nice for the
> uninstall program to d
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Dan wrote:
> Because of its design, you can not remove AOO from your computer until you
> close it. O
This sounds like a bug. Can't the uninstall routine first kill the
quick-loader process?
FC
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> In fact, I'm from .uy ;-) But there's no yahoo.com.uy. :-D
>
> Regards from Montevideo
>
> Sylvia
>
Greetings from across the pond, then. :)
FC
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:20 PM, "Marra Åsheim" wrote:
> This is just sad: http://office-software-suite.pikimal.com/top/10/pikirank
>
> OOo isn't even on the front page.
>
Defeatism. I never heard of that pikimal.com page before ;).
FC
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Sylvia Sánchez
wrote:
> Respectfully,
> Sylvia
> /Con cariño desde Fedora 17/
>
Good to see someone else from .AR here too. :)
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verd
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> . The main goal has always been to create the best Office suite
> possible - so let's unite around that.
The LO guys should have thought about that before forking OpenOffice
following Novell's siren's call. (remember the first major fork of
Ope
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
> Try explaining to users the logic of having to install a 32bit JRE when
> they have a 64bit system
You don't explain it at all. 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the JRE can
co-exist on 64-bit windows. It won't interfere with your ability to
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Niall Martin wrote:
> I have experimented with Open Office Base, but found it difficult to
> find my way
> into its facilities and vocabulary, to work out what it can do for me.
>
Here is a tutorial, FWIW.
http://inpics.net/base.html
By the way, I remember Lot
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Scooter C wrote:
> A Search brought up LibreOffice, so I thought I found it and installed it.
> Later I tripped over an article that mentioned Apache's take over of MY OOo
> and installed it. I also found this User group. I felt at home and bristle
> at negative c
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Mike Noddin wrote:
> Hi, please remove from the techy mailing list
You can do it yourself. Check out the footer of every e-mail from the list:
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Hope this helps.
FC
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Gil Blais wrote:
> How to stop Open Office from loading as a SERVICE ?
>
> Windows 7, 64 bit
>
Maybe this is part of the "quick loading" feature?. Just guessing
FC
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Kevin Grignon
wrote:
> Can you share your thoughts on what success looks like in terms of the user
> experience? What are the steps you would expect to perform in the editor to
> share your content on a wiki?
>
> Thoughts?
>
Something as basic as "File->Export->
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:03 PM, John Boyle wrote:
> : And you did NOT bother to read what was said,
Yes, I read what you said, and the whole thread. My point was that at some
point you highlighted that AOO was "not worth the trouble" and that your
option was moving to LibreOffice. That, on a AOO
Once upon a time, Sun Microsystems created a wiki editor extension for
OpenOffice.org.
I remember reading it worked, and also I remember reading comments
about it stopping working with recent versions of wiki software.
I wonder what is the current status of that extension
http://extensions.openoff
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, John Boyle wrote:
> !:-( :-( =-O =-O
You are angry and use lots of caps and want to vent your frustration
using lots of exclamation marks. Fine. But that doesn´t mean you have
right to spread lies ("AOO is a total rewrite").
If you want to use LibreOffice, fine,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hugo Costa wrote:
>
> What's UX?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_experience
FC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-h
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Kevin Grignon
wrote:
>
> Product development requires a balance of exploitation and incremental
> enhancement of the existing code base, while exploring new and innovative
> implementations. Together we can define such balance.
Sounds reasonable, Kevin. My comment
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> however I wonder if
> the FOSS resources are being spread too thin.
The LO jihad should have thought about that before hearing the call of
sirens from Novell to fork. Sun refused Novell' s Go-OO OOXML patches
for a reason: you can't advance OD
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:21 AM, l x wrote:
> I'm Xin Li, I have been an UX designer for Symphony and I'm very glad to
> join ooo-users mailing list. I'd love to focus on AOO user experience work
> in the future.
As long as you don't want to turn AOO into Symphony, it's fine with
me. In other word
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Almost every list I'm subscribed to includes a short [Listname] i
Oh-oh. I replied to the OP without checking. I've just realized
OO-users is included in the subject line.
So I don't get what the OP was
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Jeffrey Deutsch
wrote:
>
> I respectfully suggest the list owners/managers consider doing this -
> maybe after taking a membership poll?
+1
Almost every list I'm subscribed to includes a short [Listname] in the
subject line. Makes messages easier to spot on the i
51 matches
Mail list logo
