ng untouched
> Classic Rexx programs on current ooRexx.
>
> At least that is my vote... when porting Classic Rexx to ooRexx, expect
> some code changes to best optimize for ooRexx.
>
> I am thankful,
>
> --
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.luec
to have been as yet addressed (I had checked
a few months ago).
I can't say if this issue is a 'showstopper'.
Harmander Singh
On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 at 08:08, J Leslie Turriff wrote:
> On 2022-06-17 15:53:37 Sanford Geiger wrote:
> > I agree that 5.0 is way overdue for GA
vsorry for text duplication in my last email
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 12:15, Harmander Singh wrote:
>
>> Tests indicate that, in ooRexx5 in Windows, code like
>> linein(f), lines(f), charin(f), chars(f)
>> causes a huge slowdown vis-a-vis their ooRexx counterparts
>&g
>
>
> Tests indicate that, in ooRexx5 in Windows, code like
> linein(f), lines(f), charin(f), chars(f)
> causes a huge slowdown vis-a-vis their ooRexx counterparts
> s~linein, s~lines, s~charin, s~chars
>
> A likely cause is indicated in Rick McGuire's comment in email thread
> shown under
or Rick, please point at such
> items or let us know how to find them ourselves! :)
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> On 26.01.2021 08:59, Harmander Singh wrote:
>
> Many thanks for your offer:
> if someone can point at an item you could tackle I volunteer to help you
> t
incorporate all
your changes
into the trunk at Sourceforge.
I can be emailed separately to start off.
Regards
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 06:17, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> On 25.01.2021 02:34, Harmander Singh wrote:
>
> Could getting more hands on deck help? Maybe specific tasks anyone thinks
Could getting more hands on deck help? Maybe specific tasks anyone thinks
can be offloaded may be announced, and volunteers can then interact with
the person to accomplish them.
I had earlier volunteered but was not offered any task (perhaps none was
suited to my skill-set which is: a lot of Rexx
maybe on platforms other than Windows it is still an issue?
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 12:45, Harmander Singh wrote:
> re the 7-bit ASCII issue, the situation seems to hve vastly improved, as
> some time back Notepad has started using UTF-8 files by default. I now find
> I can process such
re the 7-bit ASCII issue, the situation seems to hve vastly improved, as
some time back Notepad has started using UTF-8 files by default. I now find
I can process such files in a natural way using ooRexx. Earlier it used to
be a great pain.
Harmander Singh
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 at 13:06, J Leslie
My view is that ooRexx should be honourably able to get away with this:
with numeric digits 1, you have to first code something like the
understandable
numeric digits 2
before using
numeric digits 18
the code
numeric digits 1
numeric digits 2
numeric digits 18
say 2/3
yields
0.66
Excellent! It might be better to retain the name rexxpg for the primer, in
line with traditional language doco.
Harmander Singh
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 08:26, Jon Wolfers wrote:
> +1
>
> This makes sense to me.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:54, Rony G. Flatscher
>
sorry, I wished to mail to the RexxLA member list.
On 8 February 2016 at 12:08, Harmander Singh wrote:
> I had thought it would be straightforward, but the solution eludes me.
>
> The following Rexx code, run in Windows cmd mode, tries to delete the last
> char output to terminal:
I had thought it would be straightforward, but the solution eludes me.
The following Rexx code, run in Windows cmd mode, tries to delete the last
char output to terminal:
do i=1 to 4
call charout, i**2"."
end
call charout, "08 7F"x
--08 is backspace, 7F is delete
It fails: the l
13 matches
Mail list logo
